Re: "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- From: Evan Kirshenbaum <kirshenbaum@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:09:34 -0800
Bob Cunningham <exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:15:17 -0800, Evan Kirshenbaum
> <kirshenbaum@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>> "CIC" dialects, which don't distinguish between /O/ and /A/
>
> Taken at face value, that makes me definitely not a "CIC"
> speaker, because I most certainly distringuish between
> "born" ([bO:rn]) and "barn" ([bA:rn]).
>
> I believe I use the same vowel in "cot" and "caught", but
> clearly not in "cart" and "court". (I use the same vowel in
> "cot", "caught" and "cart".)
It may be that you only have a phonemic distinction before /r/.
--
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------
HP Laboratories |We never met anyone who believed in
1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |fortune cookies. That's astounding.
Palo Alto, CA 94304 |Belief in the precognitive powers
|of an Asian pastry is really no
kirshenbaum@xxxxxxxxxx |wackier than belief in ESP,
(650)857-7572 |subluxation, or astrology, but you
|just don't hear anyone preaching
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/ |Scientific Cookie-ism.
| Penn and Teller
.
- References:
- "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- From: Jim Lawton
- Re: "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- From: Evan Kirshenbaum
- Re: "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- From: Bob Cunningham
- "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Teatime
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Teatime
- Previous by thread: Re: "walk" or "wuck" or "wahk" - was American-o
- Next by thread: U.S. Media preference for weak past verbs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|