Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: "Al in Dallas" <alfargnoli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 10:59:08 -0800
Purl Gurl wrote:
[big snip]
> You folks delight in and make a
> very frequent habit of insulting me, most ignorantly.
[snip]
> I have personal strength, have self-confidence. You, plural, do not.
> I stand strong, alone, where you boys call for reinforcement.
>
> So you tell me who displays a firm but fair attitude and who does not.
Perhaps you should spend some time thinking about why so many
choose to "insult" you. Perhaps it involves your own adolescent
behavior. Perhaps many are tired of seeing you assume that your
opinion is gospel.
You prattle on whether you know what you're talking about or not.
You do NOT display a firm but fair attitude (since you asked).
You are embarassingly immodest. (obAUE: Or do I mean "conceited"?)
You conflate consensus with calling "for reinforcement."
Thanks for playing. Please return after doing some growing up.
--
Al in St. Lou
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- References:
- non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: Jim Lawton
- Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: Mark Browne
- Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- From: Purl Gurl
- non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- Prev by Date: Usage of "from...to..."
- Next by Date: Engish names Question
- Previous by thread: Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- Next by thread: Re: non-gender-specific gender-specific terms of abuse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading