The missing article
- From: Claude Weil <cweil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:09:49 +0100
Emulating newspaper headlines in omitting articles has become
fashionable. In the phrases "the writing of abstracts", "the
assassination of Lincoln", or "the theft of three paintings", no good
writer would dream of dispensing with the definite article before the
first noun. Why, then, does one so often read sentences such as "Drug
X was used in treatment of acromegaly" or "Follow-up of patients
revealed that ..."? Using nouns as adjectives enables articles to be
omitted, e.g. in "liver disease symptoms" or "child abuse prevention",
but confusion lurks: Does "abstract writing" refer to the writing of
abstracts or to writing that is abstract (cf. abstract painting)? Does
"patient follow-up" involve patients or patience? Does "child
psychiatrist" designate a psychiatrist for children or a medical
wunderkind? Besides, the piling up of modifiers leads to odd or
unsightly constructions, e.g. "sexual function disorder treatment" or
"mixed connective tissue disease diagnosis"; in the former instance, a
hyphen ("sexual-function disorder treatment") may at least prevent the
reader from wondering what the sexual treatment of a function disorder
consists of; in the latter, a sensible remedy is to write "the
diagnosis of mixed connective-tissue disease", with the article and a
hyphen. (Apropos of hyphens, "fried-fish merchant" avoids the
ambiguity of "fried fish merchant", where the merchant might appear to
be fried instead of the fish.)
CW
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The missing article
- From: Robert Lieblich
- Re: The missing article
- Prev by Date: Re: Lucy shared as she meant her to her disappointment
- Next by Date: Re: Lucy shared as she meant her to her disappointment
- Previous by thread: Lucy shared as she meant her to her disappointment
- Next by thread: Re: The missing article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|