Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: "Robert E. Lewis" <rlewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:14:16 -0600
"R H Draney" <dadoctah@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dpmjsd031e2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sara Lorimer filted:
> >
> >Skitt <skitt99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Adrian Bailey wrote:
> >> > "bridie" wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Which one is correct?
> >> >>
> >> >> The ducks are swimming in the water
> >> >> The ducks are swimming on the water
> >> >
> >> > Both.
> >>
> >> Google results show a ratio of 74:1 for "in".
> >>
> >> Personally, I'd never say it with "on", but some, it seems, would.
> >>
> >> (I Googled on "swimming +in +the water" and "swimming +on +the water".)
> >
> >I would swim in the water, but can imagine ducks doing either.
>
> I can't...by and large, they're anatomically incapable of sinking...the
> Intelligent Designer's little joke is that they can't get down....r
<pause for small groan>
There are a number of species of diving ducks, who swim under water,
foraging in the mud at the bottom for the critters they eat. But that's how
I'd probably describe it -- swimming _under_ water.
But when I see them gliding across the surface, I think of ducks being on
the water.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: Skitt
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- References:
- swimming in, swimming on
- From: bridie
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: Adrian Bailey
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: Skitt
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: Sara Lorimer
- Re: swimming in, swimming on
- From: R H Draney
- swimming in, swimming on
- Prev by Date: Re: a wash
- Next by Date: Re: a big pink book
- Previous by thread: Re: swimming in, swimming on
- Next by thread: Re: swimming in, swimming on
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|