Re: Survival langauge
- From: "Purl Gurl" <purlgurl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:05:39 GMT
Chess One wrote:
> Purl Gurl wrote:
> > Chess One wrote:
> >> Mike Lyle wrote:
> >> > Chess One wrote:
> > Very much so. Mathematical proofs are well accepted by all because
> > there is so little room for debate; numbers cannot be argued.
> [ an aside: Do you have some math background too? I have a little
> electro-optics, which is a physics discipline, but messes with very small
> number like 10^-1 ]
Very much so. Inherently my education in science includes mathematics.
Of no interest, when I began pursuit of a college education, my first step
is to take a complete course of study in Algebra through Calculus at
our community college. I felt so lacking in math through high school
studies, logically I knew I must refresh my studies to do well in college.
Community college for me, is high school all over again before stepping
into the rigors of university studies; I want a good foundation before building.
During the time period, a universal theory is our Universe, when expressed
though mathematics, beyond Planck's Time, is our Universe is chaos.
While studying math, Scientific American published a number of articles
about discoveries of "order in chaos." Researchers discovered this chaos
is truly very complex orderly mathematics. Our belief our Universe is
chaotic, turns out to be only chaos of our minds. Those discoveries led
me to understanding, "Numbers cannot be argued."
Long before those discoveries, Einstein quips,
"I am convinced that He does not play dice."
Einstein intuitively knows numbers cannot be argued, but can be unknown.
Numbers cannot be argued. Numbers can be misunderstood or not understood;
you cannot argue one is a chaotic two.
> Whenever it arrives, you will enjoy Dr E's Travels in hyper-reality. He has
> much fun with this subject, and the real and certifyably genuine fake,
> contrasted with the fake real...
I am digesting his thinking, slowly. Makes for good bedtime reading
when other interests are finished.
Genuine fake and genuine fake real. Yep. This will always booger our minds.
This returns to, "Are we the dream or the dreamers."
I have learned over the years to never accept anything as real
until it ups and severely bites my ass.
Purl Gurl
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- References:
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Father Ignatius
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Robert Bannister
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Tony Cooper
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Evan Kirshenbaum
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Tony Cooper
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Chess One
- Re: Survival langauge
- Prev by Date: permitting
- Next by Date: Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Previous by thread: Re: Survival langauge
- Next by thread: Re: Survival langauge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|