Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Stuart Chapman <moc.dnop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:42:11 GMT
Purl Gurl wrote:
Skitt wrote:
By the way, you say you are a teacher. Well, I don't want to be too critical, but your above contribution has a few quite glaring flaws,
Those flaws are what?
You have provided no basis for your contention which inherently dismisses your contention as baseless.
Purl Gurl
At the risk of invoking your wrath, I consider the following selections to be flawed. My takes on the selections are in parentheses:
"You have provided no basis for your contention which inherently dismisses your contention as baseless."
(Your contention is baseless.)
"I can speak to some of this, Skitt."
(I can speak about some of this, Skitt.)
"Should a student meet that criteria, then teachers, counselors and administrators
will meet, discuss the student, then vote to advance or hold back."
(Should a student meet that criterium, then teachers, counselors and administrators
will meet, discuss the student, then vote to advance or hold back.)
"Their thinking, the group, is a student will be placed in special classes,
remedial classes, upon high school entry. Those classes will "catch up"
the student to current standards."
(The thought of the group, is that a student will be placed in special classes,
remedial classes, upon high school entry. Those classes will "catch up"
the student to current standards.) ("catch up accepted", as it is within quotation marks.)
"My thinking is a student who fails miserably, usually backed by previous
grade level failures and advancement, a student at grade eight who fails
is so far behind, no remedial class will help."
(My thinking is, that for a student who fails miserably, and when backed by previous
grade-level failures, no remedial class will help.)
"Number one problem leading a student to failure, is lack of reading skills.
I contribute this directly to a lack of parental involvement. When a student
fails, short of learning disabilities, this fault rests directly upon the shoulders
of his parents. It is the parents who have failed, not the student nor his
classroom teachers."
(The number one problem leading a student to failure is a lack of reading skills.
I attribute this directly to a lack of parental involvement. When a student
fails, apart from a learning disability, the fault rests directly upon the shoulders
of the parents. It is the parents who have failed, not the student, nor the teachers.)
"At a university level, even post-graduate level, I have found many of my students
are reading and writing back there at that grade eight level. This "advancement"
mule manure is pervasive through all grade levels, including university level."
(At university, even with postgraduates, I have found many of my students
are reading and writing at an eighth-grade level. This "advancement"
mule manure is pervasive through all grade-levels, including university levels.)
"Administrative support and counselor support for teachers, is zero. Those
two offices are arch enemies of teachers, especially administration."
(There is no administrative and counselor support for teachers. Those
two offices are arch enemies of teachers, especially administration.)
That's enough for now. Feel free to correct my mistakes.
Stupot .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Evan Kirshenbaum
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Chess One
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Will
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- References:
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Prev by Date: Re: First and Second Person Agreement
- Next by Date: Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Previous by thread: Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Next by thread: Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading