alt.usage.english
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: AUE: A Status Report
- Re: Me and myself
- Re: Knackered
- Re: Me and myself
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: genital
- Me and myself
- Re: American sayings
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Re: Hello everybody, new member
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: American sayings
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: genital
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: etymology, root lexemes and morphological derivatives
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- AUE: A Status Report
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- "(non)denumerably infinite" [was: Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]]
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- too stupid to be psychotic?
- Re: etymology, root lexemes and morphological derivatives
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: genital
- Re: What's he do?
- Intro D: Mini-FAQ on Grammar, Usage & Punctuation
- Re: American sayings
- Re: Knackered
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Proofread this, please
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Missive
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: Survival langauge
- American sayings
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Proofread this, please
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Hello everybody, new member
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Re: any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: any and no
- Re: any and no
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Re: To look at, he might have been a clerk
- Re: To look at, he might have been a clerk
- Re: Word of the Year
- Re: Knackered
- Re: To look at, he might have been a clerk
- Re: Cheese
- Re: lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Hello everybody, new member
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- To look at, he might have been a clerk
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: genital
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Oh for the ...
- Word of the Year
- lodging off the Euston Road
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Knackered
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Oh for the ...
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Can "However" replace "But" at the beginning of a sentence?
- Re: Knackered
- Re: any and no
- Re: any and no
- Re: Knackered
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Knackered
- Re: Knackered
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Missive
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Missive
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Missive
- Re: Cheese
- Knackered
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: genital
- etymology, root lexemes and morphological derivatives
- Re: What's he do?
- inkhorn terms [WAS: any and no]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: CD/DVD-ROM Dictionary
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Proofread this, please
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: any and no
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: any and no
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: any and no
- Re: Cablemodem uses a cable modem? [was: Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]]
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: any and no
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: any and no
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: genital
- Re: genital
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Fake English
- Re: genital
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: genital
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: genital
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: drinking
- Re: Fake English
- Re: genital
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: genital
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Cheese
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: Survival langauge
- A sentence can't start with 'But'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Missive
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: genital
- Re: any and no
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: Fake English
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Fake English
- Re: genital
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Missive
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: any and no
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Elegant variation lives!
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Elegant variation lives!
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Fake English
- Re: any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: genital
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: Cablemodem uses a cable modem? [was: Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]]
- Re: Cheese
- Finding yourself in a persistent controversial state
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Is it correct?
- Cablemodem uses a cable modem? [was: Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]]
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: CD/DVD-ROM Dictionary
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: CD/DVD-ROM Dictionary
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: drinking
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Cheese
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: any and no
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: any and no
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: any and no
- Re: Fake English
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: the with streets
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: any and no
- Re: any and no
- Re: Usage of personal names
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: genital
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Cheese
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: the with streets
- Re: OT: Cheese
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- OT: Cheese
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: articles again...
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: genital
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Fake English
- Re: drinking
- Re: drinking
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: genital
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: the with streets
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: the with streets
- Re: the with streets
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: drinking
- Re: drinking
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: drinking
- Re: drinking
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: drinking
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: tree fluid
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: tree fluid
- drinking
- Re: genital
- Re: any and no
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Leaping fish
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- tree fluid
- Re: She's a keeper.
- Re: She's a keeper.
- genital
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: A record ticket number was sold...
- any and no
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- She's a keeper.
- CD/DVD-ROM Dictionary
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re-occurrence of an error (was Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence]
- Re: Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Re: Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: Pangrams
- Uniqueness of a single occurrence [was: Re: ISP vs "newsgroup server provider":]
- Danger: online! [was: Re: Question for Agent (and other news reader) users]
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "find a job" yes: "secure a job: no [was: Re: Is it correct?]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Usage of personal names
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Usage of personal names
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: A record ticket number was sold...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: "find a job" yes: "secure a job: no [was: Re: Is it correct?]
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Usage of personal names
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Usage of personal names
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Usage of personal names
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: A record ticket number was sold...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: Making sense of it all...
- Re: A record ticket number was sold...
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: articles again...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: language proper
- Re: What's he do?
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: language proper
- Re: Fake English
- Here (was: the with streets)
- Re: Fake English
- Re: about women!
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Fake English
- Re: about women!
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: about women!
- Re: language proper
- Re: Fake English
- Re: the with streets
- Re: language proper
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Something funny about English. The rapist / therapist
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: partly/partially to blame
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the with streets
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the with streets
- Re: the with streets
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: language proper
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Fake English
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: about women!
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: about women!
- Jean-Luc Godard
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: articles again...
- Re: the with streets
- Re: "find a job" yes: "secure a job: no [was: Re: Is it correct?]
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: the with streets
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: articles again...
- Re: Fake English
- Re: articles again...
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: the with streets
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Blinders?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: articles again...
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: High 'n' Low (was Re: 'Roman catholics')
- Blinders?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Fake English
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: articles again...
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: partly/partially to blame
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Fake English
- Re: articles again...
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: the with streets
- Re: Fake English
- Re: articles again...
- Re: went off the phone
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: the with streets
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- went off the phone
- Re: Fake English
- Re: articles again...
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Fake English
- Intro C: Mini-FAQ on Words & Phrases
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: Name for lines on a map
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: the with streets
- Re: partly/partially to blame
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Fake English
- Re: air-balls?
- Re: the with streets
- Re: articles again...
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Fake English
- partly/partially to blame
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Name for lines on a map
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: the with streets
- From: Pawe³ Piotr Stawski
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the with streets
- Re: Estuary English
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Fake English
- articles again...
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Bom Bom
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Fake English
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- air-balls?
- Re: the with streets
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: the with streets
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: about women!
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: the with streets
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: the with streets
- From: Pawe³ Piotr Stawski
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: true story - easy puzzle
- Re: the with streets
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- Re: "Gone through the looking glass"
- "Gone through the looking glass"
- From: Christian Christmann
- Re: about women!
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- the with streets
- From: Pawe³ Piotr Stawski
- Re: Fake English
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: about women!
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Fake English
- Re: client vs customer - securities
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Which is correct?
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Fake English
- client vs customer - securities
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: What's he do?
- Which is correct?
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Fake English
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Fake English
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Fake English
- Re: High 'n' Low (was Re: 'Roman catholics')
- Re: Fake English
- Re: Fake English
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Fake English
- Re: about women!
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- Re: bored of
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: about women!
- Re: about women!
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: about women!
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: What's he do?
- Re: about women!
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: about women!
- What's he do?
- about women!
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: bored of
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Bring it along
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Survival langauge
- Bring it along
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- "<be> in the tank for <someone>"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: High 'n' Low (was Re: 'Roman catholics')
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Books as a self study guide
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: High 'n' Low (was Re: 'Roman catholics')
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: "Has" or "Have"?
- Re: bored of
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Books as a self study guide
- Re: Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- High 'n' Low (was Re: 'Roman catholics')
- Really bad word play...Phil, this is for you.
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: bored of
- Re: bored of
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Estuary English
- bored of
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Simple past vs past continuous
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Survival langauge
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Survival langauge
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Estuary English
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Estuary English
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: misunderstand as..., misunderstand that... (English Language)
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- From: L'altro fratello che non si firma mai
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: "important to" vs. "important for"
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: "important to" vs. "important for"
- misunderstand as..., misunderstand that... (English Language)
- Balderdash and Piffle
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: For UK English speakers...
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: For UK English speakers...
- Re: Adjectives used as nouns
- From: Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: "important to" vs. "important for"
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: gift cards?
- "important to" vs. "important for"
- Re: can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- can you rate 3 titles? [was vowel troubles]
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Re: 'Roman catholics'
- Books as a self study guide
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- 'Roman catholics'
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- You know you've been reading AUE too long...
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: Sales taxes in New York
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Sales taxes in New York
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Sales taxes in New York
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: Semi-truck
- Re: Sales taxes in New York
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: I need proofreader
- Sales taxes in New York
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: I need proofreader
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: I need proofreader
- Re: gift cards?
- Obedient dogs in the UK?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: I need proofreader
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- Re: gift cards?
- gift cards?
- Re: I need proofreader
- I need proofreader
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: gift cards?
- Intro B: Useful Web Sites for AUE Participants
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: Complaint to Ryanair
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Looking for a word
- Complaint to Ryanair
- From: L'altro fratello che non si firma mai
- Re: smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "Has" or "Have"?
- Re: Your message will appear in alt.usage.english momentarily.
- Re: "Has" or "Have"?
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: "Has" or "Have"?
- Re: Your message will appear in alt.usage.english momentarily.
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: "find a job" yes: "secure a job: no [was: Re: Is it correct?]
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: Your message will appear in alt.usage.english momentarily.
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Your message will appear in alt.usage.english momentarily.
- 'Janet and John' readers? [Was: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?]
- Your message will appear in alt.usage.english momentarily.
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Made in America
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: Basque, Hungarian, Finnish
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Adjectives used as nouns
- Re: Adjectives used as nouns
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Basque, Hungarian, Finnish
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Looking for a word
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- 'The Shortest Horror Story Ever Written' [Was: Is it common knowledge...]
- "find a job" yes: "secure a job: no [was: Re: Is it correct?]
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Adjectives used as nouns
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Adjectives used as nouns
- Re: Basque, Hungarian, Finnish
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Looking for a word
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Adjectives used as nouns
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Semi-truck
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Looking for a word
- the usage of "fair haired boy"
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Basque, Hungarian, Finnish
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: For UK English speakers...
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Basque, Hungarian, Finnish
- Re: For UK English speakers...
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: English Grammar Books
- smaller, less firm and less tangy than oranges
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Inpatriate Intransient Snobs (was: What to call American Indians)
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: as he was/as he had been thirty years ago
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: Is it common knowledge...
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Why does French sound gayer than English ???
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: American and British Actors mixed in Movies
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Made in America
- Re: Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: vowel troubles
- Single quotes for slight paraphrasing?
- Re: not that
- Re: Semi-truck
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Made in America
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: as he was/as he had been thirty years ago
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Idle curiosity question for Australians
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Is it correct?
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Is it correct?
- Re: Semi-truck
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Made in America
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- as he was/as he had been thirty years ago
- Re: Looking for a peer** word
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Looking for a peer** word
- Re: Semi-truck
- Re: Made in America
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: English Grammar Books
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Made in America
- Semi-truck
- Re: Why does French sound gayer than English ???
- Re: Enough Already!
- English Grammar Books
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: not that
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "crumplet"?
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Why does French sound gayer than English ???
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- "crumplet"?
- Inpatriate Intransient Snobs (was: What to call American Indians)
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Made in America
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Made in America
- Re: BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Made in America
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- BrE pronunciation of "Christian"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: not that
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: not that
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Made in America
- Re: not that
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: not that
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: not that
- not that
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Made in America
- Re: Made in America
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Made in America
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Intro A: Welcome to AUE and Guidelines for Posting
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "crumpet"?
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: Enough Already!
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: Hooters?
- Enough Already!
- From: Reinhold (Rey) Aman
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Made in America
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Easy Money
- Re: "crumpet"?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Hooters?
- "crumpet"?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Why does French sound gayer than English ???
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: let in/let out
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: let in/let out
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- f... knuckles
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- "put down the book" or "put the book down"?
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: Hooters?
- "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Made in America
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Questions about Betty Schrampfer Azar's book
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Re: Questions about Betty Schrampfer Azar's book
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Difference between alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Dictionary interest and collecting
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: feliz navidad...pc style?
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Questions about Betty Schrampfer Azar's book
- Re: vowel troubles
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Happy Midwinter things
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Can the following be written better?
- Can the following be written better?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Happy Midwinter things
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: let in/let out
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Attention: anybody
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: let in/let out
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: Attention: anybody
- let in/let out
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- When "false" is true [was: Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Attention: anybody
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- WIT Survey: Reactionaries, sign back there
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: vowel troubles
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- vowel troubles
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Hooters?
- FEED experience - What is the meaning?
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: feliz navidad...pc style?
- Colon (was: Reflexive pronoun usage)
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: Epithet (was Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener])
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: Epithet (was Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener])
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: feliz navidad...pc style?
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- I must say, I am impressed. <-- is that correct?
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Epithet (was Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener])
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Hooters?
- Epithet (was Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener])
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: feliz navidad...pc style?
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Hooters?
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Again, some sentences
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Hooters?
- Hooters?
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- feliz navidad...pc style?
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Dictionary interest and collecting
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener]
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener]
- Re: bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Again, some sentences
- makes good [WAS: boolean and Zener]
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: T-shirt
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- T-shirt
- From: Pawe³ Piotr Stawski
- bird tables [was Re: Again, some sentences]
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Intro G: Where is the FAQ?
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: 'Fugaise' [Was: chicken divan]
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Can "matchmaking" be used as a verb?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Opting (was: Sallary vs wages)
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: ACDA and gillette
- Re: Again, some sentences
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- ACDA and gillette
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- ACDA and gillette
- ACDA and gillette
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Again, some sentences
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: Dictionary interest and collecting
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Again, some sentences
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Real Estate For Beginners
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: Real Estate For Beginners
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: boolean and Zener
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: Active tenses
- Re: consisted in
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Active tenses
- Reflexive pronoun usage
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: 'Fugaise' [Was: chicken divan]
- Dictionary interest and collecting
- Re: Pangrams
- 'Fugaise' [Was: chicken divan]
- Active tenses
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: Pangrams
- why is the passive voice in a sentence such an issue?
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- boolean and Zener
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: focused or focussed?
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: He was so foolish as to lie????
- Which is the best plural? [was Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"]
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: Pangrams
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Pangrams
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: focused or focussed?
- "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Admission, admittance
- focused or focussed?
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Metaphysical Injuns
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: Sallary vs wages
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Sallary vs wages
- From: Per Henneberg Kristensen
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: chicken divan
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: chicken divan
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Metaphysical Injuns
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: gjetost
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Metaphysical Injuns
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Metaphysical Injuns
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: He said that he is considering the ....
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Admission, admittance
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: So do you
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: So do you
- Re: So do you
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: So do you
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: He said that he is considering the ....
- He said that he is considering the ....
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: So do you
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: So do you
- Re: AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: consisted in
- Re: So do you
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: So do you
- Re: So do you
- So do you
- Re: gjetost
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: consisted in
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Agatha Christie: A Great Dame
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: chicken divan
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: High dungeon
- Re: Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: a game piece (poem vs poem)
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: chicken divan
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Lower 49
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Admission, admittance
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Please help judge these sentences
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Lower 49
- AUE in the dictionaries
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: What to call American Indians
- chicken divan
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What a load!
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Genocide, ethnic cleansing and related terms
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Savage
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: a game piece (poem vs poem)
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Bad signs in corporate buildings
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Sloppy Arnow
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Praat
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: gjetost
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: What a load!
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What a load!
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: gjetost
- Re: gjetost
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Let's get commatose [was: What to call American Indians]
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: gjetost
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: gjetost
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: gjetost
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: gjetost
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Lower 49
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Let's get commatose [was: What to call American Indians]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- High dungeon
- Flashman and the Redskins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: Attention: anybody
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- The Golden Age of AUE
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Th
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: Th
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Lower 49
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Praat
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Whence "went" [was: Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]]
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Is that right?
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Whence "went" [was: Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Th
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: OT: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Intro F: Contents of AUE FAQ and FAQ Supplement
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Th
- From: Young Sociolinguist
- Re: Th
- From: Young Sociolinguist
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Praat [was: Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: Civilized (MS-E= civilised)
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: OT: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- "House of Rest" and "Mental science"
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Attention: anybody [was Re: Too PC]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: gjetost
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Civilized (MS-E= civilised)
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: OT: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- gjetost
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: He was so foolish as to lie????
- Re: He was so foolish as to lie????
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: Misleading commas
- He was so foolish as to lie????
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "people" is not the plural of "person"
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- OT: Outlook Express and Newsgroups
- Re: What to call American Indians
- "people" is not the plural of "person" [was: Re: Is that right?]
- Re: What a load!
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Sloppy Arnow
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- What a load!
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Rushes
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sloppy Arnow
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Rushes
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Rushes
- Re: Th
- Rushes
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: I can't imagine this situation. that is "bore a hole right though a very large piston head"
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Th
- Re: Th
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- The Seven Deadly Sins
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Too PC
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: Too PC
- Re: Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Too PC
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Too PC
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: Going downhill, are they?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "Deadly" Crash
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Going downhill, are they?
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Apostrophe
- "Deadly" Crash
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Too PC
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Slips (period fashion?)
- Re: AUE is Dying
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: DIY coffin.
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Too PC
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Spam style
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: With "the" or without
- From: John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Is that right?
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: What to call American Indians
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Spam style
- Re: With "the" or without
- Re: "He should be certified."
- What to call American Indians
- Re: Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- With "the" or without
- From: b83503104@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: Anyone vs Any one
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Why "a inflorescence"?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: Anyone vs Any one
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: What is the reason you 'dont want to' consider The Creator ?
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- God Is On Our Side (was Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Th
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Killfile Heaven (was AynRand-God - nuts)
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Bin Laden and his cell phone
- Re: Anyone vs Any one (was: House of Dr. Edwardes)
- Re: Spam style
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What is the reason you 'dont want to' consider The Creator ?
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Common Writing Styles
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Spam style
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Is that right?
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Is that right?
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: The now and happening present continuous
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- The now and happening present continuous
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: "He should be certified."
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Lazy Authors
- "He should be certified."
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: [OT] "The Meatrix"
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: [OT] "The Meatrix"
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Hunger pains
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: To Nate
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Common Writing Styles
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Anyone how the word "lemon" started being associated with bad cars?
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Common Writing Styles
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Misleading commas
- Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Common Writing Styles
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- [OT] "The Meatrix"
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Common Writing Styles
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- trolley "hurry cart" bogey
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Do so-and-so much?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Anyone how the word "lemon" started being associated with bad cars?
- Common Writing Styles
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: when u sing a song with nonsensical lyrics...
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE as chatroom
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE as chatroom
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: "It's me"
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: Girlie men
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Th
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: AUE is Dying
- Re: Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Th
- From: Young Sociolinguist
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- AUE is Dying
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Is that right?
- Re: Who is Soft Mick?
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: is it okay to just say "Okay."
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Misleading commas
- Is that right?
- From: Big Al, \(Iso Allo\)
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Sloppy Arnow [was: Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]]
- Re: Misleading commas
- Re: Th
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Th
- Misleading commas
- Parents-AynRand-God problem seen in the wild [was Re: 'being nuts']
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: is it okay to just say "Okay."
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Th
- Re: [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: Who is Soft Mick?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Appropriate names
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Th
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Th
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: is it okay to just say "Okay."
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Re: Th
- is it okay to just say "Okay."
- Re: Th
- Re: Th
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Th
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Th
- Re: Th
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: The range of the effect of an adjective
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: Lazy Authors
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Lazy Authors
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- What does two sentences means?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Th
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: big noses
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: The range of the effect of an adjective
- When Purl Gurl is right [was: Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]]
- Re: Anyone how the word "lemon" started being associated with bad cars?
- Re: Who is Soft Mick?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- [OT] "The House of Dr. Edwards"
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Poem about why people often won't try foods from other cultures they don't understand
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Poem about why people often won't try foods from other cultures they don't understand
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Girlie men
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: "Swoon" as a transitive verb
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Sis's phone call (was something else)
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Sis's phone call (was something else)
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Who is Soft Mick?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: 'being nuts'
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Who is Soft Mick?
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Medical/chemical terms
- Medical/chemical terms
- 'being nuts'
- What's cybersquatting or typosquatting?
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: And I hunted her, scrambling like a beggar on marble wharves
- Re: Freudian slip?
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- AUE as chatroom [was Re: Racists In This Group]
- Application rejected [Was:Sanskrit is much better than English !!!]
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Apostrophe
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: question about 'ONLY'
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Libertarian Linguistics & The Language of Liberty
- question about 'ONLY'
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: stuff
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: stuff
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Pimping a Hamburger
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Pimping a Hamburger
- And I hunted her, scrambling like a beggar on marble wharves
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: diddy-wah-diddy
- Re: Ordering steak?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Comma Before "Owing To"?
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Penfriend
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Which way is upwards?
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Online casino games are statistically "flawed"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: diddy-wah-diddy
- OT: unexplained odd attachment [Was:Re: "It's me"]
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: "It's me"
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Which way is upwards?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: stuff
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: big noses
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Do so-and-so much?
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: stuff
- Re: Icists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Icists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: big noses
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: stuff
- Re: big noses
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: "It's me"
- From: Bill Bonde ('Soli Deo Gloria')
- Re: big noses
- Re: big noses
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: US "rendering" political prisoners?
- Apostrophe
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Hello. Help please with plural form.
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Booger Rhyme was (Literacy in the USA)
- Re: Icists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Do so-and-so much?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: big noses
- Re: Icists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: stuff
- Re: stuff
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: big noses
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Fortran won yesterday [was: Re: Why "Sparky"]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Hello. Help please with plural form.
- Re: Sparks, Chips, and proctology [was; Re: I have a chip both shoulders]
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: "Assume for a/the moment"
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Icists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: big noses
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Re: stuff
- Re: when u sing a song with nonsensical lyrics...
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Looking for an Australian friend
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: "Assume for a/the moment"
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: stuff
- Re: Siblicide
- Re: Which way is upwards?
- Re: Oysters for Christmas
- Re: Christmas wishes - help
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- VARK
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: stuff
- Re: "Assume for a/the moment"
- Re: "Assume for a/the moment"
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: Christmas wishes - help
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: stuff
- Siblicide
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- stuff
- Re: Radio 4 recommendation
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: Christmas wishes - help
- Re: when u sing a song with nonsensical lyrics...
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: OT: Comedy? You could have fooled me.
- Re: I can't imagine this situation. that is "bore a hole right though a very large piston head"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: My sufficiency is...
- Re: I mean for you to see = ?
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: "Assume for a/the moment"
- Re: Do so-and-so much?
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: I can't imagine this situation. that is "bore a hole right though a very large piston head"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- My sufficiency is...
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Christmas wishes - help
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Do so-and-so much?
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: I can't imagine this situation. that is "bore a hole right though a very large piston head"
- What is the best way to improve my vocabulary?
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: big noses
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Why "Sparky"
- Re: Congratulation to this newsgroup!
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Racists In This Group
- Re: "It's me"
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good
- Re: Literacy in the USA -- not so very good