alt.usage.english

• Date Index

---

• Re: Is booze the answer?, Nate Branscom
• Re: Question on parenthetical element and verb plural/singular, Nate Branscom
• How to ask somebody to say "I wish you well" to a friend in hospital for me, cyberdude
  • Re: How to ask somebody to say "I wish you well" to a friend in hospital for me, Nate Branscom
• Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Jell
  • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, ray o'hara
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, ray o'hara
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, the Omrud
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Wordsmith
  • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, R H Draney
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Lars Eighner
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, R H Draney
      • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Lars Eighner
  • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, John Dean
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Is "repertoire" the longest word you can type on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard??, Ross Howard
• stepwisely, Christian Christmann
  • Re: stepwisely, Wood Avens
    • Re: stepwisely, Mike Lyle
  • Re: stepwisely, Mike Lyle
  • Re: stepwisely, Jell
• Young Sociolinguist, Young Sociolinguist
  • Re: Young Sociolinguist, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Black British South Asians, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Black British South Asians, Don Aitken
• in depth, Marius Hancu
  • Re: in depth, William
  • Re: in depth, Don Phillipson
    • Re: in depth, ranolki
• Potato power, Marius Hancu
  • Re: Potato power, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Potato power, R H Draney
      • Re: Potato power, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Potato power, Prai Jei
      • Re: Potato power, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Potato power, John Dean
      • Re: Potato power, Mark Brader
    • Re: Potato power, William
  • Re: Potato power, Pat Durkin
• Beethoven's string quartets, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Ross Howard
    • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Prai Jei
    • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, irwell
      • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, TsuiDF
  • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Beethoven's string quartets, Charles Riggs
• hearken back OR hark back, retrosorter
  • Re: hearken back OR hark back, Mike Lyle
  • Re: hearken back OR hark back, Don Phillipson
    • Re: hearken back OR hark back, R H Draney
  • Re: hearken back OR hark back, Donna Richoux
• Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, ranolki
      • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Chris Waigl
    • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Robert Lieblich
      • Eddos (was: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?), Mark Brader
      • Re: Eddos (was: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?), Richard Maurer
      • Re: Eddos (was: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?), Ross Howard
      • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, Nate Branscom
  • Re: Is "both ... but also" used in English today?, sage
• quote, santhana
  • Re: quote, Tony Cooper
  • Re: quote, M. J. Powell
  • Re: quote, Rickie Beth
    • Re: quote, Mark Brader
    • Re: quote, R H Draney
    • Re: quote, Default User
      • Re: quote, Mike Lyle
      • Re: quote, Default User
      • Re: quote, R H Draney
  • Re: quote, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: quote, John Dean
• British stew, Charles Riggs
  • Re: British stew, Weatherlawyer
• One week in eight??, muza
  • Re: One week in eight??, Tony Cooper
    • Re: One week in eight??, Mark Brader
      • Re: One week in eight??, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: One week in eight??, Tony Cooper
      • Re: One week in eight??, Mike Lyle
      • Re: One week in eight??, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: One week in eight??, Lanarcam
    • Re: One week in eight??, Charles Riggs
  • Re: One week in eight??, John Dean
• the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Alan
  • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Charles Riggs
  • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Don Aitken
    • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, R H Draney
  • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
  • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Mark Brader
    • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, Mike Lyle
  • Re: the case of the disappearing ['s] syndrome, brians@xxxxxxx
• BBC usage: "Canada government", thirty-seven
  • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Ross Howard
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Mike Lyle
  • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Prai Jei
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Peter Duncanson
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Peter Duncanson
  • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Don Phillipson
  • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", thirty-seven
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Ross Howard
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Mike Lyle
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Ross Howard
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Mark Brader
      • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Laura F. Spira
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Mark Brader
  • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Steve MacGregor
    • Re: BBC usage: "Canada government", Mark Brader
• Slang and word creation, Tommy M
  • Re: Slang and word creation, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Slang and word creation, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Slang and word creation, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Slang and word creation, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Slang and word creation, Tommy M
      • Re: Slang and word creation, Lars Eighner
  • Re: Slang and word creation, Donna Richoux
• Awe, shucks!, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Awe, shucks!, Armond Perretta
    • Re: Awe, shucks!, brians@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Awe, shucks!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Awe, shucks!, Ben Zimmer
• The aggressive k, irwell
  • Re: The aggressive k, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: The aggressive k, Charles Riggs
      • Re: The aggressive k, Robert Bannister
      • Re: The aggressive k, Charles Riggs
    • Re: The aggressive k, Don Phillipson
      • Re: The aggressive k, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: The aggressive k, Bob G
      • Re: The aggressive k, Charles Riggs
      • Re: The aggressive k, Richard R. Hershberger
      • Re: The aggressive k, R H Draney
      • Re: The aggressive k, Mark Brader
  • Re: The aggressive k, the Omrud
  • Re: The aggressive k, R H Draney
    • Re: The aggressive k, Robert Bannister
      • Re: The aggressive k, R H Draney
      • Re: The aggressive k, rbaniste1
      • Re: The aggressive k, rbaniste1
• about English reflexives, Ray
  • Re: about English reflexives, J. W. Love
  • Re: about English reflexives, Don Phillipson
  • Re: about English reflexives, PR
  • Re: about English reflexives, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: about English reflexives, Mike Lyle
  • Re: about English reflexives, John Lawler
• Chickens? [was Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4], Laura F. Spira
  • Re: Chickens? [was Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4], Mike Lyle
    • Re: Chickens? [was Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4], Wood Avens
      • Re: Chickens? [was Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4], Sara Lorimer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chickens? [was Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4], Charles Riggs
• Uncle Scrooge?, agrgurich
  • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Alan
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, rbaniste1
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Chris Waigl
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, the Omrud
  • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Jacqui
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, agrgurich
  • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Jacqui
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Jacqui
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, R H Draney
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Sara Lorimer
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Robert Bannister
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, the Omrud
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Linz
  • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Uncle Scrooge?, John Dean
• [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
  • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Mike Lyle
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
  • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
    • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Skitt
  • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
    • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, JF
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Charles Riggs
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
    • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, JF
      • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
    • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, JF
      • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Charles Riggs
  • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: [OT] Sunday Fun for Men and Women, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Sunday Fun for Men and Women, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: $20 dollars, Maria Conlon
  • Re: $20 dollars, ArWeGod
    • Re: $20 dollars, Stuart Chapman
      • Re: $20 dollars, ArWeGod
    • Re: $20 dollars, JF
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: $20 dollars, Bob G
    • Re: $20 dollars, Mark Brader
• Mirror/Mir, Wordsmith
  • Re: Mirror/Mir, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Mirror/Mir, John Lawler
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, John Lawler
    • Re: Mirror/Mir, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, rbaniste1
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, nancy13g
    • Re: Mirror/Mir, Wordsmith
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mirror/Mir, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Mirror/Mir, sage
• a little help, giamyl
  • Re: a little help, John Lawler
    • Re: a little help, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: a little help, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: a little help, Maria Conlon
      • Re: a little help, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • a little help, giamyl
• I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, Troy Steadman
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, Django Cat
  • Message not available
    • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, the Omrud
      • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, R H Draney
      • Re: I've just received this Email. Is it genuine? Am I seriously wealthy?, the Omrud
• explanation, agataabi
  • Re: explanation, leon
  • Re: explanation, Lars Eighner
    • Re: explanation, John Lawler
  • Re: explanation, Don Phillipson
• Re: Which sounds best?, Ross Howard
  • Re: Which sounds best?, rbaniste1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Which sounds best?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Which sounds best?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Which sounds best?, R H Draney
      • Re: Which sounds best?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Which sounds best?, Wordsmith
      • Re: Which sounds best?, Laura F. Spira
    • Re: Which sounds best?, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Which sounds best?, Linz
• Steep learning curve - or not?, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, R H Draney
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, the Omrud
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, R H Draney
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Lars Eighner
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, R H Draney
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mark Brader
    • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, John Dawkins
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, JF
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Skitt
  • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mike Barnes
  • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Ramon
    • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, R H Draney
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, R H Draney
  • Re: Steep learning curve - or not?, Jitze Couperus
• Little Ho on the Prarie, the Omrud
  • Re: Little Ho on the Prarie, Lars Eighner
• Chocolate and boinks, Mike Lyle
• capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, gerryhandke
  • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Mike Lyle
    • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, R H Draney
      • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Mark Brader
      • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, R H Draney
    • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Ross Howard
  • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Mark Brader
    • Re: capitalisation in hyphenated titles - advise?, Mike Lyle
• Shade of difference, Christian Christmann
  • Re: Shade of difference, Lars Eighner
  • Re: Shade of difference, Bob Cunningham
• Ebooks, JF
  • Re: Ebooks, rbaniste1
  • Re: Ebooks, Jacqui
    • Re: Ebooks, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: Ebooks, Adrian Bailey
  • Re: Ebooks, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Ebooks, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Ebooks, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Ebooks, JF
      • Re: Ebooks, Richard Bollard
• "took" and "tuck", Bob Cunningham
  • Re: "took" and "tuck", Mike Lyle
    • Re: "took" and "tuck", Robert Bannister
  • Re: "took" and "tuck", batdorf
  • Re: "took" and "tuck", PR
    • Re: "took" and "tuck", Jacqui
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", Ross Howard
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", TsuiDF
    • Re: "took" and "tuck", Ross Howard
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", the Omrud
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", Robert Bannister
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", Ross Howard
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", the Omrud
      • Re: "took" and "tuck", Mike Lyle
• Re: Question on subjects, verbs, and plural/singular, Mike Lyle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question on subjects, verbs, and plural/singular, Lars Eighner
• Can something be very satisfactory?, henryc
  • Re: Can something be very satisfactory?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Can something be very satisfactory?, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Can something be very satisfactory?, FB
  • Re: Can something be very satisfactory?, Charles Riggs
• that is so random, retrosorter
  • Re: that is so random, ray o'hara
  • Re: that is so random, Jacqui
    • Re: that is so random, Mike Lyle
      • Re: that is so random, Jacqui
    • Re: that is so random, rbaniste1
      • Re: that is so random, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: that is so random, rbaniste1
  • Re: that is so random, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: that is so random, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: that is so random, Nate Branscom
      • Re: that is so random, rbaniste1
      • Re: that is so random, Nate Branscom
      • Re: that is so random, Rickie Beth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • that is so random, retrosorter
• Re: greatest prose, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: greatest prose, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: greatest prose, Charles Riggs
  • Re: greatest prose, Chris Waigl
    • Re: greatest prose, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: greatest prose, Chris Waigl
      • Re: greatest prose, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: greatest prose, Chris Waigl
      • Re: greatest prose, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: greatest prose, Wordsmith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: greatest prose, Tony Cooper
    • Re: greatest prose, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: greatest prose, Tony Cooper
  • Re: greatest prose, R H Draney
  • Re: greatest prose, Sara Lorimer
• Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Michael Nitabach
    • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, chris . editrix
      • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Pat Durkin
      • Naivety (was: Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes), Charles Riggs
  • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Lawyers, artists and prostitutes, izzy
• Re: 419 Reply I Couldn't Resist, R H Draney
  • Re: 419 Reply I Couldn't Resist, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: 419 Reply I Couldn't Resist, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: 419 Reply I Couldn't Resist, Spehro Pefhany
• Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Markus Appel
  • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), JF
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Donna Richoux
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), james
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), John Lawler
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Donna Richoux
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Donna Richoux
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), R H Draney
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Mark Brader
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Wordsmith
    • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Markus Appel
  • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Alan Jones
    • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Michael Nitabach
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Alan Jones
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Robert Bannister
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Laura F Spira
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Laura F Spira
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Skitt
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Robert Bannister
  • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Wayne Brown
    • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Markus Appel
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Michael Nitabach
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Paul Wolff
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), the Omrud
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Alan Jones
      • Re: Relative clauses and prepositions (word order), Wayne Brown
• None of you understand or understands (....)?, Amy
  • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Michèle°
  • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Mark Brader
    • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Mark Brader
      • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: None of you understand or understands (....)?, Michael Nitabach
• You must try this, kobimal
• Dictionary for download ?, Reshma . Chugani
  • Re: Dictionary for download ?, Raymond S. Wise
• Re: Xah's Edu Corner: Hebophilia, Carmen L. Abruzzi
• Verbals - Which is correct:, George Jetson
  • Re: Verbals - Which is correct:, Mark Brader
    • Re: Verbals - Which is correct:, Michael Nitabach
• OT: George Best Remarks, The Other Fran
  • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: George Best Remarks, John Dean
    • Re: George Best Remarks, the Omrud
  • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, John Dean
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, John Dean
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Paul Wolff
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, John Dean
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Paul Wolff
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Indecent exposure? [was: Re: OT: George Best Remarks], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Indecent exposure? [was: Re: OT: George Best Remarks], John Dean
      • Re: Indecent exposure? [was: Re: OT: George Best Remarks], Ross Howard
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, sage
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, R H Draney
      • Football (soccer) laws [was: Re: OT: George Best Remarks], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Football (soccer) laws, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, John Dean
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, John Dean
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mike Lyle
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mike Lyle
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mike Lyle
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • "offside" in football (soccer) [was:Re: OT: George Best Remarks], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "offside" in football (soccer), Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: "offside" in football (soccer), Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "offside" in football (soccer), Paul Wolff
      • Re: "offside" in football (soccer) [was:Re: OT: George Best Remarks], Mike Lyle
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ross Howard
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ross Howard
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Django Cat
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Django Cat
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mike Lyle
    • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Django Cat
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ross Howard
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Django Cat
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, the Omrud
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Django Cat
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, mUs1Ka
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Mike Barnes
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, M. J. Powell
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Paul Wolff
      • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, Ross Howard
  • Re: OT: George Best Remarks, the Omrud
• Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
  • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, the Omrud
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Django Cat
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Django Cat
  • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mickwick
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mark Brader
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Django Cat
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Django Cat
  • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, the Omrud
    • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Jacqui
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, FB
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mark Brader
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Jacqui
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Jacqui
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, R J Valentine
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Murray Arnow
      • Message not available
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Clarifications needed about Nesbit, rbaniste1
• Re: Latin roots of English?, Mike Lyle
• Writing efficiently, Bob
  • Re: Writing efficiently, JF
    • Re: Writing efficiently, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Writing efficiently, Wordsmith
    • Re: Writing efficiently, FB
  • Re: Writing efficiently, Michael Nitabach
  • Re: Writing efficiently, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Writing efficiently, JF
  • Re: Writing efficiently, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: Writing efficiently, Bob
      • Re: Writing efficiently, Michael Nitabach
  • Re: Writing efficiently, Ted Schuerzinger
• more accurate(ly), Christian Christmann
  • Re: more accurate(ly), Mark Brader
  • Re: more accurate(ly), Jeffrey Turner
• must and "have to", Christian Christmann
  • Re: must and "have to", John Lawler
    • Re: must and "have to", Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Survey: request for help, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Survey: request for help, Pat Durkin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Survey: request for help, Peter H.M. Brooks
    • Re: Survey: request for help, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Survey: request for help, Mickwick
      • Re: Survey: request for help, the Omrud
• A degree of separation, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: A degree of separation, Mickwick
    • Re: A degree of separation, rbaniste1
      • Re: A degree of separation, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: A degree of separation, Mickwick
      • Re: A degree of separation, the Omrud
      • Re: A degree of separation, rbaniste1
      • Re: A degree of separation, Mickwick
      • Re: A degree of separation, rbaniste1
      • Re: A degree of separation, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], mUs1Ka
      • Re: Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Still not seeing Mickwick [Was:Re: A degree of separation], Charles Riggs
  • Re: A degree of separation, Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: A degree of separation, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: A degree of separation, John Dean
      • Re: A degree of separation, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: A degree of separation, Robin Bignall
• to make a realization - Is this good English ?, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: to make a realization - Is this good English ?, Bob Cunningham
  • Re: to make a realization - Is this good English ?, Carmen L. Abruzzi
• Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Mickwick
  • Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Robin Bignall
    • Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Robin Bignall
      • Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: gendo: informal study group in southern california, Robin Bignall
• Re: Xah's Edu Corner: a-word-a-day: minimalist, R H Draney
• A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
  • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Donna Richoux
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, John Lawler
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Mark Brader
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, John Lawler
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
    • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
    • Re: A Question To A Sentence, CDB
      • Re: A Question To A Sentence, newbie_tw
• Re: Coach-house, Harvey Van Sickle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Coach-house, rbaniste1
• Re: Xah's Edu Corner: noeteny, Wood Avens
• quieted down, sklin
  • Re: quieted down, TakenEvent
    • Re: quieted down, Will
      • Re: quieted down, JF
      • Re: quieted down, Will
      • Re: quieted down, bayskater
      • Re: quieted down, JF
      • Re: quieted down, Mickwick
      • Re: quieted down, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: quieted down, Mark Brader
      • Re: quieted down, CDB
      • Re: quieted down, Mike Lyle
      • Re: quieted down, TakenEvent
• What's in a name, sygehus
  • Re: What's in a name, TakenEvent
  • Re: What's in a name, Helen Hurley
  • Re: What's in a name, John Dean
    • Re: What's in a name, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: What's in a name, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What's in a name, John Dean
  • Re: What's in a name, Tony Cooper
    • Re: What's in a name, irwell
  • Re: What's in a name, Wordsmith
  • Re: What's in a name, Mike Lyle
  • Re: What's in a name, Blue Hornet
  • Re: What's in a name, izzy
• Labrador (was: Latin roots of English?), Mark Brader
  • Re: Labrador (was: Latin roots of English?), CDB
• "Psychology 101", Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: "Psychology 101", Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: "Psychology 101", Wood Avens
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Django Cat
      • Re: "Psychology 101", the Omrud
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Django Cat
      • Re: "Psychology 101", the Omrud
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "Psychology 101", ArWeGod
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Mike Lyle
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Django Cat
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Psychology 101", R H Draney
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Richard Bollard
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Charles Riggs
      • Re: "Psychology 101", the Omrud
      • Re: "Psychology 101", ArWeGod
    • Re: "Psychology 101", Linz
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Linz
      • Re: "Psychology 101", ArWeGod
      • Re: "Psychology 101", axel
      • Re: "Psychology 101", Linz
  • Re: "Psychology 101", Bob
• formal definition, Clay
  • Re: formal definition, Maria Conlon
    • Re: formal definition, Lanarcam
  • Re: formal definition, TakenEvent
    • Re: formal definition, Jukka Aho
• What does psychology study?, Stunz
  • Re: What does psychology study?, Michael Nitabach
  • Re: What does psychology study?, Weatherlawyer
    • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
  • Re: What does psychology study?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Linz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, JF
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Richard Maurer
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Richard Maurer
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Michael Nitabach
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Skitt
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: What does psychology study?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Chess One
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Chess One
      • Re: What does psychology study?, Stunz
      • Re: What does psychology study?, R H Draney
      • Re: What does psychology study?, John O'Flaherty
• Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Skitt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Bob
    • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Mark Brader
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Bob
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Stunz
  • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Help identifying subject of sentence, Mark Brader
• Speaking truth to power, L Kozun
  • Re: Speaking truth to power, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hello everybody, TakenEvent
  • Re: hello everybody, cindy
    • Re: hello everybody, Martin Ambuhl
• Re: the engine of wikipedia, Maria Conlon
  • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
    • Re: the engine of wikipedia, JF
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Mike Lyle
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Mike Lyle
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, R H Draney
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, R H Draney
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Tony Cooper
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Jacqui
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
    • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, rexy
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, JF
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Skitt
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, CDB
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: the engine of wikipedia, the Omrud
  • Re: the engine of wikipedia, Harvey Van Sickle
• Need advice on mp3 player/recorder for recording lectures, Center
  • Re: Need advice on mp3 player/recorder for recording lectures, JF
  • Re: Need advice on mp3 player/recorder for recording lectures, Don Phillipson
• comment from across the pond, The Other Fran
  • Re: comment from across the pond, Donna Richoux
    • Re: comment from across the pond, The Other Fran
    • Re: comment from across the pond, Wordsmith
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Donna Richoux
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Blue Hornet
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Donna Richoux
    • Re: comment from across the pond, Django Cat
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Mark Brader
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Maria Conlon
      • Re: comment from across the pond, Mark Brader
• Roochew or Jumpmeat, Stuart Chapman
  • Re: Roochew or Jumpmeat, Pat Durkin
    • Re: Roochew or Jumpmeat, the Omrud
    • Re: Roochew or Jumpmeat, JF
• word for "past unhappy experience', JBH
  • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', TakenEvent
    • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', JBH
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', TakenEvent
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', John O'Flaherty
  • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Blue Hornet
    • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Wordsmith
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Skitt
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Skitt
  • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Nate Branscom
    • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', JBH
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', james
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Donna Richoux
      • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', TakenEvent
  • Re: word for "past unhappy experience', Charles Riggs
• "on accident", Alan
  • Re: "on accident", Robert Lieblich
    • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Pat Durkin
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Skitt
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", TakenEvent
      • Re: "on accident", Skitt
      • Re: "on accident", Skitt
  • Re: "on accident", Blue Hornet
    • Re: "on accident", Stuart Chapman
  • Re: "on accident", Nate Branscom
    • Re: "on accident", Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: "on accident", R H Draney
  • Re: "on accident", Helen Hurley
  • Re: "on accident", ArWeGod
• A bit about Southern talk, Skitt
  • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Django Cat
    • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Mike Lyle
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, the Omrud
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Django Cat
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, mUs1Ka
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Django Cat
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Mike Lyle
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Django Cat
    • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Donna Richoux
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Skitt
      • Re: A bit about Southern talk, Django Cat
• It is a Yang worship word; you will not speak it, R H Draney
  • Re: It is a Yang worship word; you will not speak it, Donna Richoux
  • Re: It is a Yang worship word; you will not speak it, Richard Bollard
    • Re: It is a Yang worship word; you will not speak it, Mike Lyle
• Re: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato], meee
  • Re: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato], Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Phred
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Alan Jones
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Alan Jones
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Alan Jones
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Mike Lyle
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Ross Howard
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Skitt
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Robert Bannister
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Mike Lyle
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: "Original" English [Was: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato]], Donna Richoux
    • Re: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato], TsuiDF
      • Re: How to spell spuds. [Was: OT (slightly) the origin of the potato], Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• is working for has been working for, reiro
  • Re: is working for has been working for, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: is working for has been working for, cindy
  • Re: is working for has been working for, the Omrud
    • Re: is working for has been working for, reiro
  • Re: is working for has been working for, Robert Bannister
  • Re: is working for has been working for, Blue Hornet
• And more, Charles Riggs
  • Re: And more, R H Draney
    • Re: And more, Charles Riggs
      • Re: And more, R H Draney
  • Re: And more, james
    • Re: And more, Skitt
      • Re: And more, Pritsy
      • Tattoos and Parades (Was: And more), Stuart Chapman
      • Re: Tattoos and Parades (Was: And more), Pritsy
      • Re: And more, Skitt
      • Re: And more, JF
      • Re: And more, Skitt
  • Re: And more, Ross Howard
    • Re: And more, Pat Durkin
      • Re: And more, Charles Riggs
      • Re: And more, Maria Conlon
• The best advice Peter could have had, Charles Riggs
• He trusted in God that He would deliver him, Charles Riggs
• Again, unfair, Charles Riggs
• What do you know?, Charles Riggs
• A workhouse rat, Charles Riggs
  • Re: A workhouse rat, Charles Riggs
• During that unholy storm, Charles Riggs
• His time and ours, Charles Riggs
• The poor dear, Charles Riggs
• From pub to pub, picking up parcels, Charles Riggs
  • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, TakenEvent
    • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, R H Draney
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, JF
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, Maria Conlon
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, mUs1Ka
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, JF
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, JF
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, rbaniste1
      • Re: From pub to pub, picking up parcels, JF
• Goods or goodses, ILNeN
  • Re: Goods or goodses, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Goods or goodses, ILNeN
      • Re: Goods or goodses, Mark Brader
      • Re: Goods or goodses, ILNeN
      • Re: Goods or goodses, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Goods or goodses, Salvatore Volatile
• "has" or "has got", Jen
  • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
    • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", J. W. Love
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Charles Riggs
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mike Lyle
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Phred
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wayne Brown
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mike Lyle
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wayne Brown
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Robert Bannister
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: "has" or "has got", John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Robert Bannister
    • Re: "has" or "has got", FB
      • Re: "has" or "has got", FB
    • Re: "has" or "has got", Jen
  • Re: "has" or "has got", Wordsmith
    • Re: "has" or "has got", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wordsmith
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: "has" or "has got", R H Draney
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wordsmith
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mark Brader
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Charles Riggs
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wordsmith
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Mike Lyle
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Wordsmith
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Richard Bollard
  • Re: "has" or "has got", Adrian Bailey
    • Re: "has" or "has got", FB
    • Re: "has" or "has got", Lanarcam
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Robert Bannister
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Donna Richoux
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Pat Durkin
      • Re: "has" or "has got", FB
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "has" or "has got", Adrian Bailey
  • Re: "has" or "has got", keithbc
    • Re: "has" or "has got", Matthew Huntbach
• Another gratuitous "gender" use, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Ross Howard
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Another gratuitous "gender" use, Ross Howard
• The meaning of "an arm's length", digital
  • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Alec McKenzie
    • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", R H Draney
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Chris Waigl
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", J. J. Lodder
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", JF
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Murray Arnow
  • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Tony Cooper
    • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", digital
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Charles Riggs
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Mark Brader
  • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Charles Riggs
    • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Skitt
      • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Charles Riggs
  • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", TsuiDF
  • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: The meaning of "an arm's length", Mike Lyle
• metric or measure?, Sorfe Kribet
  • Re: metric or measure?, John Dean
  • Re: metric or measure?, JF
  • Re: metric or measure?, John Lawler
    • Re: metric or measure?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: metric or measure?, Mark Brader
    • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: metric or measure?, Richard Maurer
      • Re: metric or measure?, Michael Hamm
      • Re: metric or measure?, Richard Maurer
    • Re: metric or measure?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: metric or measure?, Michael Hamm
      • Re: metric or measure?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: metric or measure?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: metric or measure?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: metric or measure?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: metric or measure?, Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: metric or measure?, Blue Hornet
      • snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Donna Richoux
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Donna Richoux
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Murray Arnow
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Mark Brader
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], rbaniste1
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Alan Jones
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], CDB
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Robert Bannister
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Mike Lyle
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Robert Bannister
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], R H Draney
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], R H Draney
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], R H Draney
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Donna Richoux
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Isabelle Cecchini
      • Message not available
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Isabelle Cecchini
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Donna Richoux
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Isabelle Cecchini
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Robert Bannister
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], the Omrud
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Mike Lyle
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], Robert Bannister
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], the Omrud
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], the Omrud
      • Re: snuck [WAS: metric or measure?], JF
      • Re: metric or measure?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: metric or measure?, Alan Jones
      • Re: metric or measure?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: metric or measure?, Robert Lieblich
      • Lawyers are near the top of the list (was: Re: metric or measure?), Charles Riggs
  • Re: metric or measure?, Ramon
    • Re: metric or measure?, TsuiDF
• It is it, again, or is it it, Helen Hurley
  • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, John Lawler
  • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Mark Brader
    • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Mark Brader
  • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Wordsmith
  • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Helen Hurley
    • Re: It is it, again, or is it it, Wordsmith
• recoup/recuperate, Adrian Bailey
  • Re: recoup/recuperate, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: recoup/recuperate, JF
    • Re: recoup/recuperate, Tony Cooper
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Charles Riggs
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Tony Cooper
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, R H Draney
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Tony Cooper
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Charles Riggs
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Tony Cooper
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Charles Riggs
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, JF
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Charles Riggs
    • Re: recoup/recuperate, R H Draney
      • Re: recoup/recuperate, Tony Cooper
• Editing before sending, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Editing before sending, Laura F. Spira
    • Re: Editing before sending, Will
    • Re: Editing before sending, Charles Riggs
• To be free, or "Don't let the bastards get you down", Charles Riggs
• Happy Thanksgiving, Charles Riggs
• Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, azah
  • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, Skitt
    • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, R H Draney
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, Josh Norther
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, R H Draney
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, Josh Norther
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, CDB
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, R H Draney
      • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, CDB
    • Re: Pendidikan Seks di sekolah..?, Charles Riggs
• Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Boki
  • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Will
    • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Charles Riggs
      • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Will
      • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Charles Riggs
    • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., bokiteam
      • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., Skitt
      • Re: Please helpt to review/comment this short essay., bokiteam
• Glorious, PR
  • Re: Glorious, Robert Lieblich
• "lead push", plasma55
  • Re: "lead push", Skitt
    • Re: "lead push", plasma55
      • Re: "lead push", Donna Richoux
      • Re: "lead push", Skitt
• "Someone's else" or "Someone else's"?, casioculture
  • Re: "Someone's else" or "Someone else's"?, matt271829-news
• Unusual subjunctive, Christian Weisgerber
  • Re: Unusual subjunctive, Mark Brader
  • Re: Unusual subjunctive, Adrian Bailey
    • Re: Unusual subjunctive, Mark Brader
    • Re: Unusual subjunctive, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Unusual subjunctive, Matthew Huntbach
• Re: Test your driving Skill at http://driving-test.friendsrus.net, Don Phillipson
• Need a word, matt271829-news
  • Re: Need a word, Paul Wolff
    • Re: Need a word, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Need a word, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Need a word, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Need a word, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Need a word, R H Draney
      • Re: Need a word, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Need a word, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Need a word, Blue Hornet
      • Re: Need a word, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Need a word, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Need a word, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Need a word, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Need a word, Ross Howard
      • Re: Need a word, Ross Howard
      • Re: Need a word, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Need a word, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Need a word, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Need a word, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Need a word, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Need a word, Blue Hornet
  • Re: Need a word, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Need a word, Mike Page
    • Re: Need a word, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: Need a word, matt271829-news
  • Re: Need a word, PR
  • Re: Need a word, retrosorter
    • Re: Need a word, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Need a word, JF
      • Re: Need a word, R H Draney
      • Re: Need a word, Mark Brader
      • Re: Need a word, R H Draney
• "cute as a button", karaokeron
  • Re: "cute as a button", Bob
    • Re: "cute as a button", Mike Lyle
    • Re: "cute as a button", Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: "cute as a button", Charles Riggs
• "let daylight upon..", Jgirl
  • Re: "let daylight upon..", Peter Duncanson
    • Re: "let daylight upon..", Jgirl
  • Re: "let daylight upon..", Donna Richoux
    • Re: "let daylight upon..", Peter Duncanson
• how to express the difference of time between two cities?, digital
  • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, Tony Cooper
    • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, digital
      • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, digital
  • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, Mike Barnes
  • Re: how to express the difference of time between two cities?, Mark Brader
• mustn't (BrE or AmE?), iwasaki
  • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Adrian Bailey
  • Message not available
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), the Omrud
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), John Dean
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Laura F. Spira
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Bob Cunningham
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Charles Riggs
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Charles Riggs
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), nancy13g
  • Message not available
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Donna Richoux
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Frances Kemmish
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Wood Avens
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), iwasaki
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Donna Richoux
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Mike Lyle
  • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), J. W. Love
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Pat Durkin
  • Message not available
    • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Matthew Huntbach
  • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: mustn't (BrE or AmE?), Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, J. W. Love
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, hhgygy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Abbreviation S.S. Help needed, Mark Brader
• Who is Nathan Wong?, nathan
  • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, nathan
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, R H Draney
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, R H Draney
  • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, R H Draney
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, the Omrud
  • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, CDB
    • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, rbaniste1
      • Re: Who is Nathan Wong?, CDB
• the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", digital
  • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Donna Richoux
    • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Tony Cooper
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Pat Durkin
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Charles Riggs
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Skitt
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Skitt
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Charles Riggs
      • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Skitt
    • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Mark Brader
  • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", the Omrud
  • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", digital
  • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", JF
    • Re: the meaning of "basicly" and about "come to me", Pat Durkin
• Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Kindred spirits, William
    • Re: Kindred spirits, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Kindred spirits, Wordsmith
    • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Wordsmith
      • Re: Kindred spirits, JF
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Wordsmith
      • Re: Kindred spirits, JF
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Wordsmith
      • Re: Kindred spirits, R H Draney
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Wordsmith
  • Re: Kindred spirits, Laura F. Spira
    • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Skitt
      • Re: Kindred spirits, R H Draney
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Kindred spirits, JF
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Kindred spirits, Wood Avens
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kindred spirits, Sara Lorimer
• Another Letter To Sis, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Another Letter To Sis, CDB
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Another Letter To Sis, CDB
• Price vs cost, present
  • Re: Price vs cost, Blue Hornet
    • Re: Price vs cost, present
      • Re: Price vs cost, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Price vs cost, Don Phillipson
      • Re: Price vs cost, Mark Brader
  • Re: Price vs cost, Bob
    • Re: Price vs cost, the Omrud
      • Re: Price vs cost, Mark Brader
      • Re: Price vs cost, the Omrud
      • Re: Price vs cost, Mark Brader
      • Re: Price vs cost, the Omrud
      • Re: Price vs cost, Mark Brader
  • Re: Price vs cost, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Price vs cost, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Price vs cost, Mike Barnes
  • Re: Price vs cost, John Lawler
• use of words, Stephen
  • Re: use of words, Don Phillipson
• As sweet as a nut, Henry Tickner
  • Re: As sweet as a nut, Donna Richoux
    • Re: As sweet as a nut, Henry Tickner
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Tony Cooper
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Donna Richoux
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Charles Riggs
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Charles Riggs
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Donna Richoux
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Charles Riggs
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Donna Richoux
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Mike Lyle
      • Re: As sweet as a nut, Paul Wolff
• remember to, bychancestone
  • Re: remember to, the Omrud
  • Re: remember to, Charles Riggs
• Why using "where" rather than "when" in this context ?, Judy
  • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when" in this context ?, Ross Howard
    • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when" in this context ?, R H Draney
  • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when" in this context ?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when" in this context ?, TakenEvent
• Why using "where" rather than "when", Judy
  • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Don Phillipson
    • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Charles Riggs
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Chris Waigl
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", the Omrud
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Chris Waigl
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Chris Waigl
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Charles Riggs
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Chris Waigl
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Mark Brader
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", Mark Brader
  • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", larrysulky
    • Re: Why using "where" rather than "when", the Omrud
• "reckon", batdorf
  • Re: "reckon", Ben Zimmer
    • Re: "reckon", batdorf
• OT: sorry, politics, Pat Durkin
  • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Charles Riggs
    • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Maria Conlon
    • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Pat Durkin
      • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Charles Riggs
  • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: OT: sorry, politics, Jeffrey Turner
• Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Stewart Gordon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, JF
    • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Skitt
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Skitt
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Wayne Brown
    • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • consequences [WAS: is 'try and win' hendiadys?], Donna Richoux
      • Re: consequences [WAS: is 'try and win' hendiadys?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: consequences [WAS: is 'try and win' hendiadys?], Robert Bannister
      • Re: consequences [WAS: is 'try and win' hendiadys?], Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Skitt
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, TakenEvent
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, TakenEvent
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, TakenEvent
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, TakenEvent
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Stewart Gordon
    • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: is 'try and win' hendiadys?, TakenEvent
• Sandwich 'mustered' doesn't cut it, Mickwick
  • Re: Sandwich 'mustered' doesn't cut it, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Sandwich 'mustered' doesn't cut it, Mickwick
• Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", Arcadian Rises
  • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", John Dean
    • alleged putative father (apf), Arcadian Rises
      • Re: alleged putative father (apf), John Dean
    • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", Pat Durkin
      • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", John Dean
      • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", Pat Durkin
    • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", Ross Howard
      • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", John Dean
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Connotation of "Putative" and "Supposed", Don Phillipson
• A Question !, Judy
  • Re: A Question !, Jordan Abel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A Question !, Judy
    • Re: A Question !, the Omrud
      • Re: A Question !, John Dean
      • Re: A Question !, Ross Howard
      • Re: A Question !, annandale
      • Re: A Question !, Mark Brader
      • Re: A Question !, John Dean
      • Re: A Question !, ArWeGod
      • Re: A Question !, TakenEvent
      • Re: A Question !, the Omrud
      • Re: A Question !, Robin Bignall
      • Re: A Question !, Tony Cooper
      • Re: A Question !, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A Question !, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: A Question !, Charles Riggs
      • Re: A Question !, John Dean
      • Re: A Question !, ArWeGod
      • Re: A Question !, izzy
      • Re: A Question !, Mark Brader
      • Re: A Question !, Weatherlawyer
• Nominations for quotes of the month -- 2005 October, Richard Maurer
  • Re: Nominations for quotes of the month -- 2005 October, Donna Richoux
• AUE's Wikipedia entry, Ross Howard
  • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, John Dean
    • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Lars Eighner
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Lars Eighner
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Jacqui
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Tony Cooper
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Tony Cooper
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Mike Lyle
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Wood Avens
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, R H Draney
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Robert Bannister
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Jacqui
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Skitt
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, the Omrud
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, John Dean
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Jacqui
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Robert Bannister
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Maria Conlon
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Jacqui
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, bopeepsheep
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Michael Hamm
  • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, The aue webmaster
    • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE's Wikipedia entry, Bob Cunningham
• "Dichters and Bravermans", Per Rønne
  • Re: "Dichters and Bravermans", CDB
    • Re: "Dichters and Bravermans", Per Rønne
• Re: test, Stewart Gordon
• When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Nocturnal
  • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Don Aitken
  • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Mark Brader
    • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, David Picton
    • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, David Picton
      • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Mark Brader
      • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, David Picton
      • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Robert Bannister
  • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Helen Hurley
  • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Nick Worley
  • Re: When do you use "a" or "an" in a sentence?, Nocturnal
• letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, mohansingh68
  • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, james
  • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
    • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, sage
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, sage
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, rbaniste1
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, rbaniste1
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, rbaniste1
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, rbaniste1
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Skitt
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, John Dean
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Richard Bollard
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
    • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alan Jones
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, JF
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alan Jones
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alan Jones
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, JF
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Alan Jones
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, rbaniste1
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Chess One
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Letters to The Economist addressed "Sis" -- why?, J. W. Love
      • Re: Letters to The Economist addressed "Sis" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, TsuiDF
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Don Aitken
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Skitt
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Skitt
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Skitt
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Richard Bollard
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Linz
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Jacqui
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Jacqui
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Linz
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, TsuiDF
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Wood Avens
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Wood Avens
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Skitt
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Default User
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Wood Avens
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
  • Message not available
    • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, the Omrud
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Mark Brader
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: letters to The Economist addressed "Sir" -- why?, Django Cat
• "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Joe Fineman
  • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, JF
  • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Pat Durkin
    • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Nick Worley
  • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Lars Eighner
    • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, bayskater
      • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Ross Howard
      • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, R H Draney
      • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Tony Cooper
    • Re: "Treat someone right" a pregnant phrase?, Ross Howard
• 1.5 hours, Pat
  • Re: 1.5 hours, larrysulky
  • Re: 1.5 hours, TakenEvent
  • Re: 1.5 hours, ArWeGod
• Quick Q, Cool Guy
  • Re: Quick Q, Skitt
    • Re: Quick Q, the Omrud
• What IS this... thing?, PR
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, wordsmith
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: What IS this... thing?, mUs1Ka
    • Re: What IS this... thing?, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, R H Draney
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, John Dean
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, Cool Guy
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, Pat Durkin
    • Re: What IS this... thing?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, R H Draney
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What IS this... thing?, PR
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, R H Draney
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, PR
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, R H Draney
      • Re: What IS this... thing?, PR
  • Re: What IS this... thing?, John Seal
• Patron/Customer, wordsmith
  • Re: Patron/Customer, TakenEvent
    • Re: Patron/Customer, wordsmith
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Patron/Customer, wordsmith
      • Re: Patron/Customer, TakenEvent
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Django Cat
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Ross Howard
      • Re: Patron/Customer, james
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Patron/Customer, the Omrud
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Skitt
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Django Cat
      • Re: Patron/Customer, Robert Bannister
  • Re: Patron/Customer, Robert Bannister
  • Re: Patron/Customer, Richard Maurer
    • Re: Patron/Customer, Wordsmith
• ED vs ID, irwell
• Re: Very sorry for bother you all, I want to introduce my watch to you!, the Omrud
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Very sorry for bother you all, I want to introduce my watch to you!, Will
  • Re: Very sorry for bother you all, I want to introduce my watch to you!, Bertel Lund Hansen
• Brussels, Laura F. Spira
• A Vocabulary Trainer registered by 30 Universities, vtrain
  • Re: A Vocabulary Trainer registered by 30 Universities, reiro
• the word "benefactor", Judy
  • Re: the word "benefactor", Robert Lieblich
    • Re: the word "benefactor", Ross Howard
      • Re: the word "benefactor", Robert Lieblich
  • Re: the word "benefactor", Don Phillipson
• OT. Public interest : Misuse of anti harassment, anti dowry Laws by INDIAN WIVES, Vinayak
  • Re: OT. Public interest : Misuse of anti harassment, anti dowry Laws by INDIAN WIVES, Don Phillipson
    • Re: OT. Public interest : Misuse of anti harassment, anti dowry Laws by INDIAN WIVES, Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT. Public interest : Misuse of anti harassment, anti dowry Laws by INDIAN WIVES, Tony Cooper
• had been staying / were staying, reiro
  • Re: had been staying / were staying, Donna Richoux
    • Re: had been staying / were staying, Ross Howard
• Demobilising as halting, The Other Fran
  • Re: Demobilising as halting, samkat
• The other side of the equation, The Other Fran
  • Re: The other side of the equation, Bob
  • Re: The other side of the equation, TakenEvent
• Re: Upcoming days (was Half Six = 18:30), Karl Reinhardt
  • Re: Upcoming days (was Half Six = 18:30), samkat
• Authentic instruments, Claude Weil
  • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Authentic instruments, Claude Weil
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Authentic instruments, ray o'hara
    • Re: Authentic instruments, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Peter Duncanson
  • Re: Authentic instruments, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Authentic instruments, Claude Weil
      • Re: Authentic instruments, JF
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Authentic instruments, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Claude Weil
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Claude Weil
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Authentic instruments, R H Draney
  • Re: Authentic instruments, Alan Jones
    • Re: Authentic instruments, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Will
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Authentic instruments, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Authentic instruments, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Mark Brader
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Authentic instruments, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Authentic instruments, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Authentic instruments, J. J. Lodder
• to whistle s.b. down the wind, K. Niebel-Bender
  • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, Blue Hornet
    • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, K. Niebel-Bender
    • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, Robin Bignall
      • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, K. Niebel-Bender
      • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, Blue Hornet
  • Re: to whistle s.b. down the wind, Donna Richoux
• English syntax, Dave
  • Re: English syntax, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: English syntax, Dave
      • Re: English syntax, John Lawler
      • Re: English syntax, Dave
  • Re: English syntax, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: English syntax, Dave
      • Re: English syntax, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: English syntax, Dave
  • Re: English syntax, Don Phillipson
    • Re: English syntax, Dave
  • Re: English syntax, R H Draney
    • Re: English syntax, JF
      • Re: English syntax, the Omrud
      • Re: English syntax, Paul Wolff
      • Re: English syntax, the Omrud
      • Re: English syntax, Paul Wolff
      • Re: English syntax, the Omrud
• Judeo-Christian, Spehro Pefhany
  • Re: Judeo-Christian, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Judeo-Christian, Laura F. Spira
    • Re: Judeo-Christian, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Judeo-Christian, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Judeo-Christian, Chris Waigl
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Richard Maurer
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Skitt
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Richard Maurer
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Judeo-Christian, Ben Zimmer
• ''to' or 'for'?, Ray
  • Re: ''to' or 'for'?, Don Phillipson
    • Re: ''to' or 'for'?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: ''to' or 'for'?, Ray
      • Re: ''to' or 'for'?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: ''to' or 'for'?, Pat Durkin
• semantic equivalence, Jarek Hirny
  • Re: semantic equivalence, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: semantic equivalence, Dave
      • Re: semantic equivalence, Jarek Hirny
      • Re: semantic equivalence, Dave
• Tyrkiet angrebet af de gamle romeres ondsindede sprog, Wilstrup
  • Re: Tyrkiet angrebet af de gamle romeres ondsindede sprog, Ted Schuerzinger
• Fewer people visiting the pub, rincewind
  • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Ross Howard
    • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, rincewind
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, the Omrud
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Salvatore Volatile
      • "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Paul Wolff
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Paul Wolff
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Charles Riggs
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Ross Howard
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Wordsmith
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Mike Lyle
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], JF
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "going to a picture/movie/show" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Mike Lyle
      • To "the" or not to "the" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To "the" or not to "the" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To "the" or not to "the" [was: Re: Fewer people visiting the pub], Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, R H Draney
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Ross Howard
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wood Avens
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
    • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Mark Brader
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
  • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Don Phillipson
  • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, TakenEvent
    • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, JF
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Will
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, TakenEvent
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, TakenEvent
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, TakenEvent
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, TakenEvent
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Will
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, JF
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Don Aitken
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Isabelle Cecchini
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Isabelle Cecchini
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, ArWeGod
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Skitt
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Wordsmith
      • Re: Fewer people visiting the pub, Jeffrey Turner
• ielts writting, leez
  • Re: ielts writting, JF
    • Re: ielts writting, leez
  • Re: ielts writting, Django Cat
• east coast, nickel
  • Re: east coast, Mark Brader
    • Re: east coast, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: east coast, ray o'hara
      • Re: east coast, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: east coast, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: east coast, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: east coast, Charles Riggs
      • Re: east coast, R H Draney
• For Don Aiken, Charles Riggs
• Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., matthewshepherd
  • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., Don Phillipson
  • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., Donna Richoux
    • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., Ross Howard
      • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., Donna Richoux
      • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., R H Draney
      • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., Mark Brader
      • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., matthewshepherd
  • Re: Asterisk. Punctuation. Arrgh., John O'Flaherty
• less/lesser, Cool Guy
  • Re: less/lesser, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: less/lesser, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: less/lesser, Blue Hornet
    • Re: less/lesser, FB
    • Re: less/lesser, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: less/lesser, Steve
  • Message not available
    • Re: less/lesser, Mark Brader
      • Re: less/lesser, John O'Flaherty
• etymology od "down pat", retrosorter
  • Re: etymology od "down pat", Charles Riggs
    • Re: etymology od "down pat", retrosorter
      • Re: etymology od "down pat", R H Draney
      • Re: etymology od "down pat", Charles Riggs
      • Re: etymology od "down pat", Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: etymology od "down pat", R H Draney
  • Re: etymology od "down pat", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: etymology od "down pat", Donna Richoux
• Is this an eggcorn?, sage
  • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, the Omrud
    • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, the Omrud
  • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, Chris Waigl
    • Re: Is this an eggcorn?, sage
• We _certified_ your request for relief from double taxation..., KS
  • Re: We _certified_ your request for relief from double taxation..., Don Phillipson
• "to have something on the brain", Holger Metzger
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", Lars Eighner
    • Re: "to have something on the brain", Holger Metzger
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", John Dean
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: "to have something on the brain", Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Joe Higman
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", Donna Richoux
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", John Dean
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", Alan Jones
    • Re: "to have something on the brain", Mark Brader
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Ben Zimmer
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "to have something on the brain", Alan Jones
  • Re: "to have something on the brain", Ian Noble
    • Re: "to have something on the brain", Holger Metzger
• Might you drive us into town?, FB
  • Re: Might you drive us into town?, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Might you drive us into town?, FB
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, FB
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, FB
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Might you drive us into town?, FB
• Re: Blood and treasure, Alan Jones
  • Re: Blood and treasure, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Blood and treasure, Alan Jones
      • Re: Blood and treasure, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Blood and treasure, wordsmith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Blood and treasure, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Blood and treasure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Blood and treasure, The Other Fran
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Mark Brader
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Ben Zimmer
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Blood and treasure, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Blood and treasure, John O'Flaherty
• British "railroad", Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: British "railroad", Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: British "railroad", Don Phillipson
  • Re: British "railroad", Graeme Thomas
    • Re: British "railroad", Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: British "railroad", Don Phillipson
      • Re: British "railroad", Graeme Thomas
      • Re: British "railroad", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: British "railroad", Graeme Thomas
      • Re: British "railroad", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: British "railroad", Robert Bannister
      • Re: British "railroad", Graeme Thomas
  • Message not available
    • Re: British "railroad", TsuiDF
• Joke!, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
  • Re: Joke!, Maria Conlon
• Masturbation, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Masturbation, Helen Hurley
    • Re: Masturbation, Nate Branscom
    • Re: Masturbation, John Dean
      • Re: Masturbation, iamlisted
  • Re: Masturbation, Spehro Pefhany
    • Re: Masturbation, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Masturbation, Mickwick
    • Re: Masturbation, Sara Lorimer
  • Re: Masturbation, R H Draney
    • Re: Masturbation, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Masturbation, R H Draney
      • Re: Masturbation, Jukka Aho
      • Re: Masturbation, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Masturbation, Nick Worley
    • Re: Masturbation, Nick Worley
• Closed or Close-minded?, Amy
  • Re: Closed or Close-minded?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Closed or Close-minded?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Closed or Close-minded?, Skitt
      • Re: Closed or Close-minded?, samkat
      • Re: Closed or Close-minded?, Robert Lieblich
• stolen away, rustywire
• Dialectizing for fun (and profit?), Maria Conlon
  • Re: Dialectizing for fun (and profit?), R H Draney
    • Re: Dialectizing for fun (and profit?), Maria Conlon
• Re: up front, Lars Eighner
• O'Leathlóbhair, PR
  • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, ray o'hara
    • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, ray o'hara
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Tony Cooper
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, PR
    • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, PR
    • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, PR
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, John Lawler
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Don Aitken
      • Message not available
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, TsuiDF
      • Re: O'Leathlbhair, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_O'Leathl=F3bhair?=, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_O'Leathl=F3bhair?=, John Lawler
      • Re: �, Robert Bannister
      • Re: ?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: =?x-unknown?q?Re=3A_O'Leathl=F3bhair?=, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: �, Robert Bannister
      • Re: ?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: ?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: ?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: �, Mike Barnes
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Snidely . too
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Robert Bannister
      • Re: O'Leathlóbhair, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• circle of people, Christian Christmann
  • Re: circle of people, Lars Eighner
    • Re: circle of people, Paul Wolff
      • Re: circle of people, Ross Howard
      • Re: circle of people, TsuiDF
      • Re: circle of people, Ross Howard
      • Re: circle of people, Lanarcam
      • Re: circle of people, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: circle of people, brians@xxxxxxx
      • Re: circle of people, Lars Eighner
  • Re: circle of people, Don Phillipson
    • Re: circle of people, Robert Bannister
      • Re: circle of people, Skitt
  • Re: circle of people, Joe Fineman
    • Re: circle of people, TsuiDF
    • Re: circle of people, TsuiDF
• 'GIF', Cool Guy
  • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
    • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Charles Riggs
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Charles Riggs
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', PR
      • Re: 'GIF', Ray Heindl
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', John O'Flaherty
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Charles Riggs
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Pat Durkin
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Don Aitken
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Peter Duncanson
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Lieblich
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Linz
      • Message not available
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: 'GIF', Wood Avens
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Jukka Aho
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', TsuiDF
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', TsuiDF
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', J. J. Lodder
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Robin Bignall
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', TsuiDF
      • Re: 'GIF', TsuiDF
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Jukka Aho
      • Re: 'GIF', Django Cat
      • Re: 'GIF', Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: 'GIF', J. J. Lodder
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Martin
    • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', irwell
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
    • Re: 'GIF', TakenEvent
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Iain Dalton
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
    • Re: 'GIF', The Grammer Genious
      • Re: 'GIF', Cool Guy
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', The Grammer Genious
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Lieblich
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Lieblich
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Firstly, seoncdly, etc (was Re: 'GIF'), ArWeGod
      • Re: Firstly, seoncdly, etc (was Re: 'GIF'), sage
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Wood Avens
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Wood Avens
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F. Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Pat Durkin
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), R H Draney
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Kludge (was: 'GIF'), Skitt
      • Re: Kludge, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Kludge, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Kludge, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Kludge, Bob Cunningham
      • Mud (was: Kludge), Mark Brader
      • Re: Mud (was: Kludge), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Mud (was: Kludge), Mark Brader
      • Re: Mud (was: Kludge), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Kludge, ArWeGod
      • Re: Kludge, Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', TsuiDF
      • Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Maria Conlon
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Murray Arnow
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Murray Arnow
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Murray Arnow
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), rbaniste1
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), james
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), R H Draney
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Plastic lemons (was: 'GIF'), R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Frances Kemmish
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', Frances Kemmish
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Frances Kemmish
      • Re: 'GIF', Ross Howard
      • Re: 'GIF', Frances Kemmish
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Paul Wolff
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Paul Wolff
      • Chocolate and boinks [was Re: 'GIF'], Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Chocolate and boinks [was Re: 'GIF'], the Omrud
      • Re: Chocolate and boinks [was Re: 'GIF'], Jacqui
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Frances Kemmish
      • Re: 'GIF', Laura F. Spira
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • "EYE ran", "Ireland", "EYE rak" [was: Re: 'GIF'], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "EYE ran", "Ireland", "EYE rak" [was: Re: 'GIF'], Mike Lyle
      • Re: 'GIF', Jordan Abel
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Lieblich
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Wood Avens
      • Not on all fours (Re: 'GIF'), ArWeGod
      • Re: 'GIF', Pat Durkin
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Mark Brader
      • Re: 'GIF', Lars Enderin
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Murray Arnow
      • Re: Folders, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Re: 'GIF', Peter Duncanson
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Richard Bollard
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Richard Bollard
      • Re: 'GIF', Pat Durkin
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mike Barnes
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Maria Conlon
      • Re: Folders, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Murray Arnow
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mike Barnes
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), JF
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Maria Conlon
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Richard Bollard
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Mark Brader
      • Re: Folders (was: 'GIF'), Pat Durkin
      • Re: Folders, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Folders, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Folders, JF
      • Re: Folders, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Folders, JF
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', R H Draney
      • Re: 'GIF', Paul Wolff
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Skitt
      • Re: 'GIF', Mark Brader
      • Re: 'GIF', Sara Lorimer
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Re: 'GIF', Mark Brader
      • Re: 'GIF', Murray Arnow
      • Re: 'GIF', Mark Brader
      • Re: 'GIF', Lars Enderin
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Donna Richoux
      • Re: 'GIF', Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', J. J. Lodder
      • Re: 'GIF', Jordan Abel
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', J. J. Lodder
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Maria Conlon
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Tony Cooper
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Bob Cunningham
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', John Lawler
      • Re: 'GIF', Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: 'GIF', Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Barnes
      • Re: 'GIF', Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: 'GIF', the Omrud
      • Re: 'GIF', Mike Lyle
  • Re: 'GIF', Witziges Rätsel
• Polly wanna cracker!, Jarek Hirny
  • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, nancy13g
    • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Jarek Hirny
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Jarek Hirny
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Jarek Hirny
    • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, R H Draney
    • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Django Cat
    • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Skitt
      • Re: Polly wanna cracker!, Django Cat
• Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling, Donna Richoux
• T*ny C**per's style of love making, Charles Riggs
• Elements of Style question., retrosorter
  • Re: Elements of Style question., John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Elements of Style question., retrosorter
    • Re: Elements of Style question., Donna Richoux
      • Re: Elements of Style question., Charles Riggs
      • Re: Elements of Style question., Skitt
      • Re: Elements of Style question., Charles Riggs
  • Re: Elements of Style question., Don Phillipson
• stay/keep interchangeable?, becky
  • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, R H Draney
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, R H Draney
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Ross Howard
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, R H Draney
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Pat Durkin
      • Spanish pronunciation [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Spanish pronunciation [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Ross Howard
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Bob Cunningham
      • Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], R H Draney
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], CDB
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], Pat Durkin
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], CDB
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], Pat Durkin
      • Re: Solfege [Was Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?]], Mark Brader
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Pat Durkin
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Skitt
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Skitt
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Skitt
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Pat Durkin
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Spanish gender & a Santa Fe restaurant [was: Re: stay/keep interchangeable?], Charles Riggs
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, R H Draney
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Skitt
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Wordsmith
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, becky
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Mark Brader
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Luke
      • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Lars Eighner
    • Re: stay/keep interchangeable?, Donna Richoux
• Need your help thank u, ethanmed
• Geek comment from "I Love Lucy" in 1952, Richard Maurer
  • Re: Geek comment from "I Love Lucy" in 1952, John Dean
  • Re: Geek comment from "I Love Lucy" in 1952, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Geek comment from "I Love Lucy" in 1952, Charles Riggs
• Please recommand English learing method., Boki
  • Re: Please recommand English learing method., Donna Richoux
    • Re: Please recommand English learing method., bokiteam
  • Re: Please recommand English learing method., The Grammer Genious
    • Re: Please recommand English learing method., bokiteam
  • Re: Please recommand English learing method., Blue Hornet
• from time to time, KS
  • Re: from time to time, Mark Brader
• basic question., Boki
  • Re: basic question., Raymond S. Wise
    • Re: basic question., Boki
• Voltaire's Candide giveaway, funksroad
• Britishism - "Come the old acid", Nocturne_CVS
  • Re: Britishism - "Come the old acid", JF
    • Re: Britishism - "Come the old acid", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Britishism - "Come the old acid", John Dean
    • Re: Britishism - "Come the old acid", Robert Bannister
• Is noxious worse than obnoxious?, Pete
  • Re: Is noxious worse than obnoxious?, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Is noxious worse than obnoxious?, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Is noxious worse than obnoxious?, Joe Fineman
  • Re: Is noxious worse than obnoxious?, Charles Riggs
• Silent Vowels, PR
  • Re: Silent Vowels, R H Draney
    • Re: Silent Vowels, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Silent Vowels, R H Draney
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Silent Vowels, R H Draney
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Wood Avens
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Silent Vowels, The Grammer Genious
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Skitt
  • Re: Silent Vowels, John Lawler
    • Re: Silent Vowels, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: Silent Vowels, John Dean
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: Silent Vowels, R H Draney
  • Re: Silent Vowels, The Grammer Genious
    • Re: Silent Vowels, larrysulky
      • Re: Silent Vowels, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Silent Vowels, larrysulky
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Silent Vowels, Prai Jei
      • Re: Silent Vowels, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Re: OT: La chasse en France [was Re: French stereotype used in a serious article], Sara Lorimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: La chasse en France [was Re: French stereotype used in a serious article], CDB
  • Re: OT: La chasse en France [was Re: French stereotype used in a serious article], Ross Howard
  • Re: OT: La chasse en France [was Re: French stereotype used in a serious article], Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: OT: La chasse en France [was Re: French stereotype used in a serious article], Salvatore Volatile
• functionality, Pete
  • Re: functionality, Lars Eighner
    • Re: functionality, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: functionality, Charles Riggs
  • Re: functionality, Bob Cunningham
  • Re: functionality, Helen Hurley
    • Re: functionality, Mark Brader
      • Re: functionality, larrysulky
• And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Skitt
    • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Mark Brader
  • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Don Phillipson
    • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Chris Waigl
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, R H Draney
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, Alan Jones
      • Re: And if you go to the morgue you're not dead?, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• enougher, Adrian Bailey
  • Re: enougher, PR
    • Re: enougher, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: enougher, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: enougher, Mike Lyle
      • Re: enougher, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: enougher, R H Draney
      • Re: enougher, SouthSeas
      • Re: enougher, Mike Lyle
      • Re: enougher, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: enougher, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: enougher, CDB
      • Re: enougher, Linz
      • Re: enougher, CDB
      • Re: enougher, Adrian Bailey
      • Re: enougher, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: enougher, J. W. Love
      • Re: enougher, Ross Howard
    • Re: enougher, larrysulky
      • Re: enougher, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: enougher, wordsmith
• Re: woman = "broad" ?, R H Draney
• Las Vegas, the Omrud
  • Re: Las Vegas, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Las Vegas, Django Cat
    • Re: Las Vegas, the Omrud
  • Re: Las Vegas, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Las Vegas, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Las Vegas, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Las Vegas, the Omrud
      • Re: Las Vegas, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Las Vegas, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Las Vegas, the Omrud
• How to Skype..., Django Cat
  • Re: How to Skype..., Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: How to Skype..., Django Cat
    • Re: How to Skype..., zbihniew
  • Re: How to Skype..., Laura F. Spira
    • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., R H Draney
      • Re: How to Skype..., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to Skype..., Laura F. Spira
      • Re: How to Skype..., Django Cat
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ross Howard
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., Peter Duncanson
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., John Dean
      • Re: How to Skype..., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Psychs (was: How to Skype...), Mark Brader
      • Re: Psychs (was: How to Skype...), jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ben Zimmer
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: How to Skype..., Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: How to Skype..., Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Barnes
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ross Howard
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Lyle
      • Re: How to Skype..., Linz
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Page
      • Re: How to Skype..., Laura F. Spira
      • Re: How to Skype..., Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: How to Skype..., Frances Kemmish
      • Re: How to Skype..., JF
      • Re: How to Skype..., Peter Duncanson
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mickwick
      • Re: How to Skype..., Robert Bannister
      • Re: How to Skype..., Pat Durkin
      • Re: How to Skype..., Donna Richoux
      • Re: How to Skype..., Tony Cooper
      • Re: How to Skype..., Sara Lorimer
      • Re: How to Skype..., Tony Cooper
      • Re: How to Skype..., Donna Richoux
      • Re: How to Skype..., Sara Lorimer
      • Re: How to Skype..., Robert Bannister
    • Re: How to Skype..., John Dean
  • Re: How to Skype..., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Barnes
    • Re: How to Skype..., R H Draney
      • Re: How to Skype..., Skitt
      • Re: How to Skype..., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • "eh": what sound? [was: Re: How to Skype...], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: what sound? [was: Re: How to Skype...], Skitt
      • Re: what sound? [was: Re: How to Skype...], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: what sound? [was: Re: How to Skype...], CDB
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Barnes
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ross Howard
    • Re: How to Skype..., Django Cat
      • Re: How to Skype..., John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to Skype..., sage
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: How to Skype..., Laura F. Spira
      • Re: How to Skype..., Mike Page
  • Re: How to Skype..., Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: How to Skype..., Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: How to Skype..., Chris Waigl
      • Re: How to Skype..., Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: How to Skype..., Linz
  • Re: How to Skype..., PR
    • Re: How to Skype..., Snidely . too
      • Re: How to Skype..., Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: How to Skype..., Frances Kemmish
  • Re: How to Skype..., KS
• Could you please proof read my CV, thanku11@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Could you please proof read my CV, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: Could you please proof read my CV, thanku11@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Led astray by context, Adrian Bailey
  • Re: Led astray by context, R H Draney
    • Re: Led astray by context, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Led astray by context, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Led astray by context, the Omrud
      • Re: Led astray by context, the Omrud
      • Re: Led astray by context, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Led astray by context, Skitt
      • Re: Led astray by context, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Led astray by context, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Led astray by context, R H Draney
      • Re: Led astray by context, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Led astray by context, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Led astray by context, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Led astray by context, The Grammer Genious
  • Re: Led astray by context, Adrian Bailey
• data in singular or plural, Christian Christmann
  • Re: data in singular or plural, John Dean
  • Re: data in singular or plural, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
  • Re: data in singular or plural, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Judy
  • Re: Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Does the sentence gramatically make sense?, Mark Brader
• the meaning of 'by', GMS
  • Re: the meaning of 'by', Donna Richoux
    • Re: the meaning of 'by', Mark Brader
    • Re: the meaning of 'by', Blue Hornet
  • Re: the meaning of 'by', J. W. Love
    • Re: the meaning of 'by', Mark Brader
      • Re: the meaning of 'by', J. W. Love
      • U.S. or US and Google synopses (was: the meaning of 'by'), Mark Brader
      • Re: U.S. or US and Google synopses (was: the meaning of 'by'), J. W. Love
• A lucky break, Charles Riggs
  • Re: A lucky break, John Dean
  • Message not available
    • Re: A lucky break, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: A lucky break, Richard Bollard
    • Re: A lucky break, Charles Riggs
  • Re: A lucky break, Blue Hornet
    • Re: A lucky break, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: A lucky break, The Grammer Genious
      • Re: A lucky break, Pat Durkin
      • Re: A lucky break, R H Draney
      • Re: A lucky break, The Grammer Genious
      • Re: A lucky break, R H Draney
• Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Judy
  • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Skitt
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Skitt
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Lars Eighner
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Skitt
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, R H Draney
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Lying "under" the sunlight or lying "in" the sunlight, Ted Schuerzinger
• Re: Could you help to review this writing?, Boki
• To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Arcadian Rises
  • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Raymond S. Wise
    • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Arcadian Rises
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, nancy13g
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Donna Richoux
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Donna Richoux
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Donna Richoux
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, J. W. Love
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Donna Richoux
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Richard Maurer
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, J. W. Love
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Linz
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Charles Riggs
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Linz
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], J. W. Love
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Charles Riggs
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Jitze Couperus
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Armond Perretta
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], JF
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Peter Duncanson
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Armond Perretta
      • Re: "populate a list" [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, John Dean
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Donna Richoux
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Alan Jones
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Mike Lyle
      • Obsolete words in _NSOED_ [was: Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, J. W. Love
  • Message not available
    • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, R H Draney
  • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: To populate=to furnish with inhabitants, Maria Conlon
• A phosphorous headline, Skitt
  • Re: A phosphorous headline, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: A phosphorous headline, Skitt
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Joe Fineman
  • Re: A phosphorous headline, PR
    • Re: A phosphorous headline, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, PR
    • Re: A phosphorous headline, Skitt
    • Re: A phosphorous headline, Ray Heindl
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Mike Lyle
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Donna Richoux
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Donna Richoux
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Mike Lyle
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Donna Richoux
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Paul Wolff
      • Re: A phosphorous headline, Jared
  • Re: A phosphorous headline, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: A phosphorous headline, Mike Lyle
• Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4 (post script), jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 'One of the handsomest white men I ever saw' [Was: "Monkey Wards"], R H Draney
• aforementioned, Christian Christmann
  • Re: aforementioned, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: aforementioned, Christian Christmann
      • Re: aforementioned, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: aforementioned, John Dean
  • Re: aforementioned, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: aforementioned, Mark Brader
      • Re: aforementioned, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: aforementioned, Mike Lyle
      • Re: aforementioned, Ross Howard
      • Re: aforementioned, Paul Wolff
      • Re: aforementioned, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: aforementioned, mr_reznat
      • Re: aforementioned, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: aforementioned, John Lawler
      • Message not available
      • Re: aforementioned, Paul Wolff
  • Re: aforementioned, Donna Richoux
    • Re: aforementioned, Mike Lyle
      • Re: aforementioned, Donna Richoux
      • Re: aforementioned, Mike Lyle
      • Re: aforementioned, Donna Richoux
      • Re: aforementioned, Mike Lyle
      • Re: aforementioned, Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: aforementioned, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: aforementioned, Mike Lyle
• Where is here?, The Other Fran
  • Re: Where is here?, The Other Fran
  • Re: Where is here?, Armond Perretta
  • Re: Where is here?, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Where is here?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Where is here?, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Where is here?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Where is here?, R H Draney
      • Re: Where is here?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Where is here?, R H Draney
      • Re: Where is here?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Where is here?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Where is here?, ray o'hara
  • Re: Where is here?, Arcadian Rises
  • Re: Where is here?, Blue Hornet
• Rhoticism explained, Django Cat
  • Re: Rhoticism explained, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: Rhoticism explained, Mark Brader
  • Re: Rhoticism explained, R H Draney
    • Re: Rhoticism explained, batdorf
• Re: ANCIENT 11 LETTER WORD PUZZLE, Lars Eighner
  • Re: ANCIENT 11 LETTER WORD PUZZLE, TakenEvent
  • Re: ANCIENT 11 LETTER WORD PUZZLE, Ray Heindl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ANCIENT 11 LETTER WORD PUZZLE, irwell
• Re: Good conversation & pronunciation evening course, Don Phillipson
• formal / informal English, galdcourse2@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: formal / informal English, Troy Steadman
    • Re: formal / informal English, Alan Jones
  • Re: formal / informal English, ArWeGod
• Language acquisition, dialects, JamesAW
  • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Matthew Huntbach
    • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Mike Lyle
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Paul Draper
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Don Aitken
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], TsuiDF
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Tony Cooper
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], wordsmith
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Wordsmith
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], Charles Riggs
      • Re: British Vikings [Was: Re: Language acquisition, dialects], John Dean
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, TsuiDF
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, John Lawler
      • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, TsuiDF
  • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, Django Cat
  • Re: Language acquisition, dialects, batdorf
• Commas Again, Cool Guy
  • Re: Commas Again, Will
  • Re: Commas Again, J. W. Love
    • Re: Commas Again, John O'Flaherty
    • Message not available
      • Re: Commas Again, J. W. Love
      • Re: Commas Again, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Commas Again, J. W. Love
      • Re: Commas Again, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Commas Again, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Commas Again, Ross Howard
  • Re: Commas Again, Prai Jei
• They laughed!, irwell
  • Re: They laughed!, ray o'hara
    • Re: They laughed!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: They laughed!, Murray Arnow
      • Message not available
      • Re: They laughed!, Django Cat
      • Re: They laughed!, Ross Howard
  • Re: They laughed!, Mark Brader
    • Re: They laughed!, Django Cat
      • Re: They laughed!, Skitt
      • Re: They laughed!, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: They laughed!, R H Draney
      • Re: They laughed!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: They laughed!, Robert Bannister
      • Re: They laughed!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: They laughed!, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: They laughed!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: They laughed!, Django Cat
      • Re: They laughed!, Charles Riggs
  • Re: They laughed!, R H Draney
    • Re: They laughed!, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: They laughed!, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: They laughed!, Django Cat
      • Re: They laughed!, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: They laughed!, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: They laughed!, Django Cat
      • Re: They laughed!, irwell
  • Re: They laughed!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: They laughed!, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: They laughed!, Robert Bannister
      • Re: They laughed!, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: They laughed!, Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: They laughed!, Richard Bollard
      • Re: They laughed!, Robert Bannister
  • Re: They laughed!, Mickwick
• Re: Shakespeare's Titus, act 4, R H Draney
• Intro D: Mini-FAQ on Grammar, Usage & Punctuation, Donna Richoux
• "alright": Yes!, Bob Cunningham
  • Re: "alright": Yes!, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: "alright": Yes!, Blue Hornet
    • "Alot": Why? [was: Re: "alright": Yes!], Bob Cunningham
  • Re: "alright": Yes!, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Message not available
    • Re: "alright": Yes!, Bob Cunningham
• Re: benedictine, Frances Kemmish
  • Re: benedictine, John Lawler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: benedictine, Matthew Huntbach
    • Re: benedictine, Pat Durkin
• Re: Comma Usage Query, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Comma Usage Query, Iain Dalton
  • Re: Comma Usage Query, Cool Guy
  • Message not available
    • Re: Comma Usage Query, Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: Comma Usage Query, Ross Howard
      • Re: Comma Usage Query, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Comma Usage Query, Paul Wolff
  • Re: Comma Usage Query, Adrian Bailey
• Re: Apostrophes After Xs, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, Salvatore Volatile
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, R H Draney
      • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, Skitt
      • Art [was: Re: Apostrophes After Xs], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Art [was: Re: Apostrophes After Xs], R H Draney
      • Re: Art [was: Re: Apostrophes After Xs], Bob Cunningham
  • Re: Apostrophes After Xs, Stewart Gordon
• For JF, Murray Arnow
  • Message not available
    • Re: For JF, William
      • Re: For JF, izzy
      • Re: For JF, William
• speed reading, jack
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: speed reading, Mike Lyle
  • Re: speed reading, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: speed reading, jack
• were it not for, maya_shankar_singh
  • Re: were it not for, Donna Richoux
    • Re: were it not for, FB
      • Re: were it not for, Donna Richoux
      • Re: were it not for, FB
      • Re: were it not for, Donna Richoux
      • Re: were it not for, Mike Lyle
• Beverly Hills Hotel, stevemdr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Beverly Hills Hotel, stevemdr
  • Beverly Hills Hotel, stevemdr
• Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, Iain Dalton
  • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, Blue Hornet
    • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, Mark Brader
      • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, Mark Brader
      • Re: Does the following sentence "step off the edge"?:, John O'Flaherty
• clutch and pedal, keylink
  • Re: clutch and pedal, Blue Hornet
    • Re: clutch and pedal, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, batdorf
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, M. J. Powell
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, M. J. Powell
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, R H Draney
      • Re: clutch and pedal, R H Draney
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Richard Bollard
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Lyle
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mickwick
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Ross Howard
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Paul Wolff
      • Re: clutch and pedal, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robin Bignall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Default User
    • Re: clutch and pedal, FB
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Default User
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Snidely . too
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Richard Ulrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Richard Ulrich
      • Re: clutch and pedal, FB
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Default User
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Default User
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Will
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Will
      • Re: clutch and pedal, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Attention, Fran (was Re: clutch and pedal), Charles Riggs
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Matthew Huntbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Alan Jones
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: clutch and pedal, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Ross Howard
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, JF
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, james
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Tony Cooper
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Page
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Page
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Tony Cooper
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Robert Bannister
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Torque (was Re: clutch and pedal), Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Torque (was Re: clutch and pedal), Paul Wolff
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
    • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Barnes
    • Re: clutch and pedal, Tony Cooper
      • Re: clutch and pedal, R H Draney
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Bertel Lund Hansen
  • Re: clutch and pedal, Don Phillipson
    • Re: clutch and pedal, Snidely . too
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Skitt
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mark Brader
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: clutch and pedal, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mike Lyle
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Charles Riggs
      • Re: clutch and pedal, Mark Brader
• Could I get some grammar advice on this sentence?, gerryhandke
  • Re: Could I get some grammar advice on this sentence?, Blue Hornet
  • Re: Could I get some grammar advice on this sentence?, John O'Flaherty
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Could I get some grammar advice on this sentence?, Donna Richoux
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Could I get some grammar advice on this sentence?, J. W. Love
• Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Frances Kemmish
  • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Skitt
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Skitt
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Don Aitken
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Skitt
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Skitt
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Mark Brader
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Quoting of legal offences in conversation, Frances Kemmish
• Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, irwell
  • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, batdorf
  • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Raymond S. Wise
    • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Don Aitken
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Mike Lyle
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Mickwick
      • Message not available
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Mickwick
    • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Peter Duncanson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: French stereotype used in a serious article, Richard Bollard
• Roger McGough's speech, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Roger McGough's speech, Django Cat
  • Re: Roger McGough's speech, Peter Duncanson
  • Re: Roger McGough's speech, batdorf
• Re: "on terms", Blue Hornet
• Re: The best word for "two hours", R H Draney
  • Re: The best word for "two hours", Blue Hornet
    • Re: The best word for "two hours", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The best word for "two hours", Blue Hornet
      • Re: The best word for "two hours", R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The best word for "two hours", Blue Hornet
    • Re: The best word for "two hours", Charles Riggs
      • Re: The best word for "two hours", Blue Hornet
      • Re: The best word for "two hours", Charles Riggs
  • Re: The best word for "two hours", The Grammer Genious
  • Re: The best word for "two hours", Sara Lorimer
• Re: Forming the Possessive of a Title, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Forming the Possessive of a Title, Blue Hornet
    • Re: Forming the Possessive of a Title, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Forming the Possessive of a Title, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Forming the Possessive of a Title, The Grammer Genious
• An unambiguous word for a full day, andrewspencers
  • Re: An unambiguous word for a full day, Wayne Brown
  • Re: An unambiguous word for a full day, Blue Hornet
    • Re: An unambiguous word for a full day, Tina
  • Re: An unambiguous word for a full day, The Grammer Genious
    • Loan words, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Loan words, Mark Browne
      • Re: Loan words, Skitt
      • Re: Loan words, R H Draney
      • Re: Loan words, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Loan words, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Loan words, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Loan words, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Loan words, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Loan words, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Loan words, Wood Avens
      • Re: Loan words, the Omrud
      • Re: Loan words, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Loan words, the Omrud
      • Re: Loan words, JF
      • Re: Loan words, R H Draney
      • Re: Loan words, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Loan words, Mark Browne
      • Re: Loan words, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Loan words, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Loan words, the Omrud
      • Re: Loan words, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Loan words, Mark Browne
      • Re: Loan words, the Omrud
      • Re: Loan words, R H Draney
      • Re: Loan words, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Loan words, the Omrud
      • Re: Loan words, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Loan words, Skitt
      • Re: Loan words, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Loan words, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Loan words, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Loan words, TsuiDF
• Minor Query, Cool Guy
  • Message not available
    • Re: Minor Query, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Minor Query, Cool Guy
      • Re: Minor Query, Donna Richoux
• I have a question, kim.minjee
  • Re: I have a question, larrysulky
    • Re: I have a question, Blue Hornet
      • Re: I have a question, Django Cat
      • Re: I have a question, Donna Richoux
      • Re: I have a question, Django Cat
      • Re: I have a question, Mark Brader
      • Re: I have a question, Blue Hornet
• Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
  • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, CDB
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Blue Hornet
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, T.M. Schenk
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, JF
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, james
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, R H Draney
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, izzy
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Robert Bannister
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Message not available
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tina
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, Skitt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Word or expression for a condition of the eyes?, JF
• 'larger' without 'than', GMS
  • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Skitt
    • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Robert Bannister
      • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Skitt
      • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Charles Riggs
  • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Django Cat
    • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Mark Brader
  • Re: 'larger' without 'than', Iain Dalton
• Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mickwick
  • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Raymond S. Wise
    • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mickwick
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mickwick
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mickwick
      • Re: Bleedingheartism, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bleedingheartism, Ben Zimmer
  • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bleedingheartism, Mickwick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
    • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Richard Bollard
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Richard Bollard
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Skitt
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Reinhold (Rey) Aman
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], The Other Fran
    • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Ross Howard
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism], Mickwick
• synonyms for maggot?, Ray
  • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Paul Wolff
  • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Sara Lorimer
  • Re: synonyms for maggot?, Charles Riggs
• Intro C: Mini-FAQ on Words & Phrases, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Intro C: Mini-FAQ on Words & Phrases, Donna Richoux
• [OT, sort of] Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Maria Conlon
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, John Dean
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Mark Brader
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Skitt
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Mark Brader
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Troy Steadman
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, John Dean
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Mark Brader
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, John Dean
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Googling may backfire for accused murderer, Maria Conlon
• Multiple-choice tests (was: whether vs. if), Mark Brader
  • Re: Multiple-choice tests (was: whether vs. if), Richard Bollard
    • Re: Multiple-choice tests (was: whether vs. if), Mark Brader
      • Re: Multiple-choice tests (was: whether vs. if), Richard Bollard
• The difference between $0.00 and 'free', TakenEvent
• Re: What's the ordinal and fractional form of "gross"?, Skitt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's the ordinal and fractional form of "gross"?, Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Counting the dolphin way, Sara Lorimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Counting the dolphin way, Peter Duncanson
• Re: Punctuation Problem, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Punctuation Problem, designquest10
  • Re: Punctuation Problem, TakenEvent
• Re: Separated by a single flight, ray o'hara
• Heckler, Robin Bignall
  • Re: Heckler, Will
    • Re: Heckler, Salvatore Volatile
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Heckler, ceceliaarmstrong
      • Re: Heckler, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Heckler, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Heckler, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Heckler, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Heckler, Don Aitken
      • Re: Heckler, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Heckler, Emil Veit
      • Re: Heckler, Mark Brader
• Re: "Illegal" What?, Mark Barratt
  • Re: "Illegal" What?, Martin Ambuhl
• Re: In "the sticks", Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", John Dean
      • Re: In "the sticks", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: In "the sticks", John Dean
      • Re: In "the sticks", Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: In "the sticks", Lars Eighner
    • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: In "the sticks", ray o'hara
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", ray o'hara
      • Re: In "the sticks", Jeffrey Turner
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", mirage
      • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", Brian Wickham
    • Message not available
      • Re: In "the sticks", ray o'hara
  • Re: In "the sticks", ray o'hara
• Re: using articles, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: using articles, CDB
    • Message not available
      • Re: using articles, CDB
• BBC7. The Spoken Word, JF
  • Re: BBC7. The Spoken Word, Tony Cooper
    • Re: BBC7. The Spoken Word, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: BBC7. The Spoken Word, Tony Cooper
• Re: OT: Vegemite, Lars Eighner
  • Re: OT: Vegemite, Sara Lorimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT: Vegemite, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: OT: Vegemite, Fred
  • Re: OT: Vegemite, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Vegemite, Robert Bannister
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Vegemite, Linz
• Re: Vegemite, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Vegemite, Sara Lorimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Vegemite, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Vegemite, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Vegemite, SouthSeas
      • Re: Vegemite, Richard Bollard
• Texas and Florida swamp notes on hurricanes, Peter Duncanson
  • Re: Texas and Florida swamp notes on hurricanes, Lars Eighner
• YOU AND I, keithbc
  • Re: YOU AND I, larrysulky
    • Re: YOU AND I, Donna Richoux
  • Re: YOU AND I, Lars Eighner
• Happy 150th Birthday!, Lars Eighner
  • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Maria Conlon
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Mickwick
      • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Happy 150th Birthday!, Mickwick
• origin of "on the money"/"on the same page.", retrosorter
  • Re: origin of "on the money"/"on the same page.", TakenEvent
    • Re: origin of "on the money"/"on the same page.", Mike Lyle
• usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Trainee
  • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Tony Cooper
    • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Mark Brader
      • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: usage of periodical collection of public libraries, Trainee
• Intro B: Useful Web Sites for AUE Participants, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Intro B: Useful Web Sites for AUE Participants, Donna Richoux
• interesting etymology, Donna Richoux
  • Re: interesting etymology, Jim Lawton
  • Re: interesting etymology, Alec McKenzie
• Re: "The flicks", Donna Richoux
  • Re: "The flicks", Jim Lawton
• Re: Do English-native always determine singular/plural?, Donna Richoux
  • Message not available
    • Re: Do English-native always determine singular/plural?, larrysulky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do English-native always determine singular/plural?, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Do English-native always determine singular/plural?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Do English-native always determine singular/plural?, Mike Lyle
• Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Jay
• analogly?, Nate Branscom
  • Re: analogly?, Fred
  • Re: analogly?, Ross Howard
  • Re: analogly?, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Re: analogly?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: analogly?, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: analogly?, TakenEvent
  • Re: analogly?, TakenEvent
• Why is the moment "blonde"?, EL
  • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Nate Branscom
    • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Nate Branscom
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, james
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Bertel Lund Hansen
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Donalbain
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Lothar Frings
  • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Raymond S. Wise
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Raymond S. Wise
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Skitt
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Richard Bollard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Richard Bollard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, SouthSeas
      • Re: Why is the moment "blonde"?, Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chicago Origins of "Dumb Blond(e)"?, Charles Riggs
• Re: Beware Beware, Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Beware Beware, birkholz
    • Re: Beware Beware, Default User
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Beware Beware, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Beware Beware, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Beware Beware, Charles Riggs
• Re: Current exemplary speakers, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Will
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Witziges Rätsel
  • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Nate Branscom
  • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Will
  • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Wayne Brown
    • Re: Current exemplary speakers, Salvatore Volatile
• Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, the Omrud
  • Message not available
    • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, John Stanton
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Mark Brader
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Bob
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Robert Lieblich
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Murray Arnow
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Frances Kemmish
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, John Dean
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Pennsylvania disses the Darwin dissers, John Dean
• OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Will
  • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, perryneheum
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Richard Maurer
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Frances Kemmish
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Bannister
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Paul Wolff
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Bob
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Bannister
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Bannister
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Donalbain
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, CDB
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Skitt
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Richard Maurer
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Richard Maurer
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Richard Maurer
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Donalbain
  • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Tony Cooper
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
    • Message not available
      • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
  • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, John Flynn
  • Message not available
    • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Ross Howard
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kansas disses Darwin Shock! Horror!, Mike Lyle
• "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Bob Cunningham
  • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Skitt
    • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Peter Olcott
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Peter Olcott
      • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Mike Lyle
      • Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words], Peter Olcott
    • "-ceed" and "-cede" [was: Re: "super(c|s)ede [was: Re: The Literal Meaning of Words]], Bob Cunningham
• Phoenician to Hebrew redux: the missing link?, Ross Howard
  • Re: Phoenician to Hebrew redux: the missing link?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Phoenician to Hebrew redux: the missing link?, izzy
• US Dialects in New Yorker article, Donna Richoux
  • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, larrysulky
    • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, larrysulky
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Ross Howard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Charles Riggs
      • "much" vs "long" [was: Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "much" vs "long" [was: Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "much" vs "long" [was: Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article]], Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Michael Hamm
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Michael Hamm
      • Re: Michael Hamm recordings [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, Bob Cunningham
    • Message not available
      • Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article, John Holmes
      • Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], CDB
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Snidely . too
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Snidely . too
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Snidely . too
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Snidely . too
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Snidely . too
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], John Holmes
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Northern Cities Chain Shift; where? [was: Re: US Dialects in New Yorker article], Wayne Brown
• Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Lothar Frings
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, the Omrud
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Salvatore Volatile
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, R H Draney
• Re: lost frog, Will
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lost frog, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Re: lost frog, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: lost frog, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: lost frog, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: lost frog, Skitt
  • Re: lost frog, Jim Lawton
    • Re: lost frog, Maria Conlon
• Re: Shakespeare: I'll to thy closet, and go read with thee, Jim Lawton
• where can i find SAT writing topics ?, bigreat@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: where can i find SAT writing topics ?, Will
  • Re: where can i find SAT writing topics ?, R H Draney
  • Re: where can i find SAT writing topics ?, Troy Steadman
• Re: Is 'paediatrician' a rare word in the UK?, R H Draney
  • Re: Is 'paediatrician' a rare word in the UK?, Skitt
    • Re: Is 'paediatrician' a rare word in the UK?, Robert Bannister
• fringing, retrosorter
  • Re: fringing, Donna Richoux
    • Re: fringing, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: fringing, Ross Howard
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: fringing, Mike Lyle
• Intro A: Welcome to AUE and Guidelines for Posting, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Intro A: Welcome to AUE and Guidelines for Posting, Donna Richoux
• supercilious high-handed cavalier, linq936
  • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, Donna Richoux
    • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, Lars Eighner
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, Donna Richoux
      • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, Charles Riggs
  • Re: supercilious high-handed cavalier, Lars Eighner
• Re: The Indy isn't boring; it's bearing, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: The Indy isn't boring; it's bearing, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: The Indy isn't boring; it's bearing, ray o'hara
• Re: zap (OT), Bob
  • Re: zap (OT), Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: zap (OT), Lars Eighner
  • Re: zap (OT), the Omrud
    • Re: zap (OT), Bob
      • Re: zap (OT), Ted Schuerzinger
• Re: "dual" number - another question, Jim Lawton
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, Charles Riggs
    • Re: "dual" number - another question, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, John Dean
    • Re: "dual" number - another question, Blue Hornet
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "dual" number - another question, Frances Kemmish
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, Donna Richoux
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, Django Cat
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, Adrian Bailey
    • Re: "dual" number - another question, R H Draney
  • Re: "dual" number - another question, Wayne Brown
    • Re: "dual" number - another question, iando
    • Re: "dual" number - another question, Mike Lyle
• Re: zap, Lars Eighner
  • Re: zap, Mark Brader
    • Re: zap, Donna Richoux
      • Message not available