Re: abbreviations



Mike Clark and I (Mark Brader) wrote:
>>> Can anybody point me to a hard and fast rule or reference source
>>> on the abbreviation of square metres....

>> I didn't expect to be posting this link twice in one day, but the
>> definitive reference on metric unit symbols is the official standard
>> where the units are technically defined...

> Thanks ..... would you say that sq.m. and sq.ft. (the latter appears in
> several dictionaries) are incorrect?

I would say that "sq.m." is incorrect. It clearly fails to conform
to the standard (which I cited), and the main reason to use SI (the
modern metric system) rather than some other form of measure is supposed
to be that everyone uses it the same way.

I could see some people taking a different point of view, and as I said,
"sq.m." might be an acceptable practical compromise if you don't have
superscripts available *and* need to repeat the unit many times. But
you should at least feel icky about having to use it.

Feet are outside of the SI altogether and therefore the SI standard
is irrelevant. I would not be surprised to see square feet written
as ft² in a context such as conversion to or from metric units like
cm² and m², or if they ever occur in a scientific context. Just about
anywhere else, though, "sq.ft." is what I'd expect, and it certainly
can't be called wrong. It's still the normal style. (In Britain,
where many people have become allergic to punctuation, they might
spell it "sq ft" or "sqft" rather than "sq.ft.")
--
Mark Brader, Toronto | "It is one thing to praise discipline, and another
msb@xxxxxxx | to submit to it." -- Miguel de Cervantes, 1613

My text in this article is in the public domain.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: More about --- Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n
    ... >> orthogonality, ... A Ls is placed in "standard form" by simply ... cannot take a square from one standard form to another. ... No other squares can be produced by permutation, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: infinity
    ... asymptotic density from number theory is quite standard. ... > But it does not make sense that if I square all of the real numbers ... > of the reals. ... >> among the reasons being that the powerset of the set with n elements ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ultra torque vs. square taper
    ... Square taper versus UT? ... The Cannondale standard might take over, ... imagine how outboard bearings will be labled as a stop gap solution ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Sudoku transformations
    ... The usual form, which I'll call "standard", of a region is a 3x3 square, although there are others. ... So, consider a standard Sudoku. ... They each become a 3x3 square array, but with two rows and two columns from other arrays between their squares. ...
    (rec.puzzles)
  • Re: More about --- Formulae for Latin squares of size 2^n
    ... when we talk about a square in standard form ... >> representing a group of squares, ... > standard form to another. ...
    (sci.crypt)