alt.usage.english

• Date Index

---

• Re: Little bishop, JF
• Re: Means of Transport and verb board/drive/catch..., Jim Lawton
• Re: I don't believe you vs I don't trust you, help plz, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I don't believe you vs I don't trust you, help plz, Evan Kirshenbaum
• Re: 9am or 9 a.m.?, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 9am or 9 a.m.?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: 9am or 9 a.m.?, Peter Duncanson
• Re: Here We Go Again with Holloween, Richard Bollard
  • Message not available
    • Re: Here We Go Again with Holloween, Charles Riggs
• Re: Following California's Footsteps in Bilingual Education, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Following California's Footsteps in Bilingual Education, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Re: Following California's Footsteps in Bilingual Education, Don Phillipson
• words you use when you tickle a toddler, Isabelle Cecchini
  • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, irwell
    • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, CDB
  • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, Peter Duncanson
  • Message not available
    • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, Charles Riggs
      • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: words you use when you tickle a toddler, Peter Duncanson
• English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Musashi
  • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Musashi
      • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Musashi
      • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Don Aitken
    • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: English Dictionary 1810-1820?, Scotius
• Re: BUSH is NOT the PRESIDENT !, Steve Hayes
• Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, batdorf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, Armond Perretta
    • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, John Lawler
  • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Which Usage Is Correct?, Mark Brader
• Re: HORNY BITCHES SUCK BIG DICK, Pat Durkin
• Re: rhetorical question mark, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: rhetorical question mark, Robert Lieblich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rhetorical question mark, Charles Riggs
  • Re: rhetorical question mark, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Re: Totally cornfield associations, John O'Flaherty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Totally cornfield associations, ray o'hara
  • Re: Totally cornfield associations, Rick Wotnaz
  • Re: Totally cornfield associations, Donna Richoux
• Fall Of The High King, newbie_tw
  • Re: Fall Of The High King, CDB
    • Message not available
      • Re: Fall Of The High King, CDB
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Usenet software [WAS: Fall Of The High King], Donna Richoux
• Re: Clause rank or phrase rank, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Clause rank or phrase rank, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clause rank or phrase rank, Chris Waigl
    • Message not available
      • Re: Clause rank or phrase rank, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Wind Young
  • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Bob
    • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Bob
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Skitt
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Skitt
    • Re: Would you mind telling me whether these sentences are correct?, Don Phillipson
• abbreviations, Mike Clark
  • Re: abbreviations, Steve Hayes
    • Re: abbreviations, R H Draney
  • Re: abbreviations, Mark Brader
    • Message not available
      • Re: abbreviations, Mark Brader
  • Re: abbreviations, Charles Riggs
• what's the word "proctive" mean?, digital21cn
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Message not available
    • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Steve Hayes
  • Message not available
    • Re: what's the word "proctive" mean?, Charles Riggs
• bland, judithk
• pretend, judithk
  • Re: pretend, John O'Flaherty
  • Message not available
    • Re: pretend, judithk
• handsomely (British or Irish), judithk
  • Re: handsomely (British or Irish), John Dean
    • Re: handsomely (British or Irish), Ross Howard
    • Re: handsomely (British or Irish), judithk
      • Message not available
      • Re: handsomely (British or Irish), judithk
  • Re: handsomely (British or Irish), Charles Riggs
• Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Michael Nitabach
      • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
    • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: Who said I don't have a life?, Charles Riggs
• Re: "Like, I think what I really wanted to do was to wish you a happy birthday and tell you that I do not know what I am talking about most of the time? =) " <--- how can i make the second part more parallel?, Fred
• "It's a different world now", The Other Fran
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Jim Lawton
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Charles Riggs
    • Re: "It's a different world now", Linz
    • Re: "It's a different world now", Paul Wolff
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Steve Hayes
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Skitt
    • Re: "It's a different world now", The Other Fran
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Skitt
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Ted Schuerzinger
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "It's a different world now", The Other Fran
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Charles Riggs
    • Re: "It's a different world now", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Skitt
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "It's a different world now", Charles Riggs
  • Re: "It's a different world now", Don Phillipson
• The Open University, Charles Riggs
• Re: Xah's Edu Corner: Hebophilia, Charles Riggs
• Re: What is the difference between "think", "think of" and "think about"???, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the difference between "think", "think of" and "think about"???, Charles Riggs
  • Re: What is the difference between "think", "think of" and "think about"???, John Lawler
• Re: The board demanded, Raymond S. Wise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The board demanded, Jim Lawton
  • Re: The board demanded, Ross Howard
  • Re: The board demanded, John Holmes
• Re: a carryall car - what is it?, JF
  • Re: a carryall car - what is it?, Peter Duncanson
    • Message not available
      • Re: a carryall car - what is it?, Paul Wolff
    • Message not available
      • Re: a carryall car - what is it?, Peter Duncanson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a carryall car - what is it?, Ross Howard
• Re: Retrofitting phrases, Prai Jei
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Retrofitting phrases, Jordan Abel
      • Re: Retrofitting phrases, Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Retrofitting phrases, Fuzzy
• Cyber insults, irwell
• Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Seán O'Leathlóbhair
  • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Harvey Van Sickle
    • Message not available
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Harvey Van Sickle
    • Message not available
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Tony Cooper
    • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Paul Wolff
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), R H Draney
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Seán O'Leathlóbhair
  • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Linz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Skitt
    • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Paul Wolff
    • Re: Booze = drink "was Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register), Harvey Van Sickle
• Re: "Utilize" associated with "software", Joe Fineman
• Re: Carol Cross Carol Cummings Carol Ficatier Carol Titian Carolina Pendarvis Chandler Chanel, R H Draney
• Re: how can i express my thought?, designquest10
  • Re: how can i express my thought?, Wind Young
    • Re: how can i express my thought?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, Wind Young
    • Re: how can i express my thought?, designquest10
    • Re: how can i express my thought?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: how can i express my thought?, TakenEvent
    • Re: how can i express my thought?, designquest10
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, Skitt
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, TakenEvent
      • Re: how can i express my thought?, designquest10
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how can i express my thought?, TakenEvent
• Re: Go to hell - Is this swearing?, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Go to hell - Is this swearing?, Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: Go to hell - Is this swearing?, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Go to hell - Is this swearing?, Joe Fineman
• Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Weatherlawyer
  • Message not available
    • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Michèle°
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, John Dean
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Philip Eden
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Michèle°
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Michèle°
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Adrian Bailey
    • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Philip Eden
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Charles Riggs
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Ross Howard
      • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Charles Riggs
      • [OT], was I wish to register a positive abstention, Philip Eden
      • Re: [OT], was I wish to register a positive abstention, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: [OT], was I wish to register a positive abstention, Philip Eden
    • Re: I wish to register a positive abstention, Matti Lamprhey
• Re: Dottle - distribution?, Laura F. Spira
  • Re: Dottle - distribution?, Wood Avens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dottle - distribution?, K. Edgcombe
  • Re: Dottle - distribution?, Ray Heindl
  • Re: Dottle - distribution?, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Dottle - distribution?, Linz
    • Re: Dottle - distribution?, Harvey Van Sickle
• rant and spew, Nick
  • Re: rant and spew, John Dean
    • Re: rant and spew, PR
      • Re: rant and spew, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: rant and spew, Charles Riggs
      • Re: rant and spew, Jim Lawton
      • Re: rant and spew, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: rant and spew, Charles Riggs
  • Re: rant and spew, Steve Hayes
• Re: Lily Mad, PR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lily Mad, Pat Durkin
• Comma usage, Joseph Turian
  • Re: Comma usage, John Dean
  • Re: Comma usage, designquest10
• Correct Usage of Apostrophe for a Company Name ending in 's', Mark Z.
  • Message not available
    • Re: Correct Usage of Apostrophe for a Company Name ending in 's', Mark Z.
• Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register, JF
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Booze", "girl cum", and register, Linz
• Re: space cadet, Salvatore Volatile
  • Message not available
    • Re: space cadet, Salvatore Volatile
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: space cadet, Evan Kirshenbaum
• Latin phrase, tootsk
  • Message not available
    • Re: Latin phrase, Donna Richoux
• Re: Horny bitches love anal sex, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Horny bitches love anal sex, Django Cat
  • Re: Horny bitches love anal sex, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Horny bitches love anal sex, TakenEvent
• Dually noted?, typingcat
• Re: Waste receptacles, Laura F. Spira
  • Message not available
    • Re: Waste receptacles, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Joe Fineman
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Philip Eden
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, JF
  • Message not available
    • Re: Waste receptacles, Philip Eden
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Philip Eden
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Joe Fineman
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Philip Eden
    • Re: Waste receptacles, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Wood Avens
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Wood Avens
      • Re: Waste receptacles, CDB
      • Re: Waste receptacles, William
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Wood Avens
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Waste receptacles, William
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Paul Wolff
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Linz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Robin Bignall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Waste receptacles, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Waste receptacles, R H Draney
    • Re: Waste receptacles, John Holmes
      • Re: Waste receptacles, R H Draney
      • Re: Waste receptacles, John Holmes
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Waste receptacles, Tony Cooper
• Re: Guys named Steve, TakenEvent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Guys named Steve, Prai Jei
    • Re: Guys named Steve, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Guys named Steve, R H Draney
• Re: shall...or...will, Django Cat
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: shall...or...will, batdorf
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: shall...or...will, CDB
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: shall...or...will, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: shall...or...will, Mike Page
  • Re: shall...or...will, FB
  • Re: shall...or...will, Ted Schuerzinger
• Some questions, FB
  • Re: Some questions, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: Some questions, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Some questions, John Lawler
  • Re: Some questions, nancy13g
    • Re: Some questions, Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Some questions, Default User
• Re: Exactly what is this most literally saying?, Peter Olcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Exactly what is this most literally saying?, J. W. Love
• Issue or problem, jmetillon
  • Re: Issue or problem, Fred
    • Re: Issue or problem, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Issue or problem, Armond Perretta
  • Re: Issue or problem, Don Phillipson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Issue or problem, batdorf
      • Re: Issue or problem, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Issue or problem, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Issue or problem, Scotius
• Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Skitt
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Raymond S. Wise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Donna Richoux
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Pat Durkin
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Robert Bannister
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, CDB
    • Message not available
      • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, CDB
  • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: danish origin in danish pastry, Skitt
• bureaux, Evan Kirshenbaum
• Re: "if your life is dear to you", CDB
• Re: What is a subject?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: on the other hand, Donna Richoux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: on the other hand, Mark Brader
• Tenor guitar, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Tenor guitar, batdorf
    • Re: Tenor guitar, Theodore Heise
  • Re: Tenor guitar, Mark Brader
    • Re: Tenor guitar, batdorf
    • Re: Tenor guitar, Salvatore Volatile
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Rick Wotnaz
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Django Cat
      • Re: Tenor guitar, batdorf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Robin Bignall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: Tenor guitar, Armond Perretta
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tenor guitar, Tony Cooper
• Re: impound, Don Phillipson
  • Re: impound, Salvatore Volatile
• Re: Meaning of "Gramorama" or "Glamorama"???, Don Phillipson
  • Re: Meaning of "Gramorama" or "Glamorama"???, R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Meaning of "Gramorama" or "Glamorama"???, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Meaning of "Gramorama" or "Glamorama"???, TsuiDF
• We Hardly Knew Ye, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Tony Cooper
    • Message not available
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Tony Cooper
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, batdorf
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, batdorf
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Donna Richoux
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, batdorf
      • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Salvatore Volatile
  • Message not available
    • Re: We Hardly Knew Ye, Tony Cooper
• Free access to Inttranews Archives for linguists, Webmaster Inttranews
• Re: she's out of order!, Laura F. Spira
  • Re: she's out of order!, Mike Lyle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: she's out of order!, CDB
  • Re: she's out of order!, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: she's out of order!, Mike Lyle
  • Re: she's out of order!, Jim Lawton
  • Re: she's out of order!, Xah Lee
    • Re: she's out of order!, Richard Bollard
• another singular/plural question, becky
  • Re: another singular/plural question, Don Phillipson
  • Re: another singular/plural question, Skitt
    • Re: another singular/plural question, larrysulky
• Re: "I" or "Me", Steve Hayes
  • Re: "I" or "Me", ArWeGod
    • Re: "I" or "Me", Steve Hayes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "I" or "Me", Matti Lamprhey
    • Re: "I" or "Me", Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: "I" or "Me", Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: "I" or "Me", Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: "I" or "Me", designquest10
  • Re: "I" or "Me", CDB
• Re: origin of saying " . . . but does his own barking", J. J. Lodder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: origin of saying " . . . but does his own barking", Seán O'Leathlóbhair
• Re: do me something!, Jim Lawton
• Where is the word Manhattan from?, Pete
  • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Steve Hayes
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Steve Hayes
  • Message not available
    • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Salvatore Volatile
  • Message not available
    • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, nancy13g
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Scotius
    • Re: Where is the word Manhattan from?, Rick Wotnaz
• Re: Many an idea, The Other Fran
• Correct or not, Pete
  • Re: Correct or not, Mark Brader
  • Re: Correct or not, Steve Hayes
    • Re: Correct or not, Default User
  • Re: Correct or not, Salvatore Volatile
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Correct or not, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Correct or not, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Correct or not, Charles Riggs
• Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Bob Cunningham
  • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Chris Waigl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Mike Lyle
    • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Bob Cunningham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Chris Waigl
      • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: Synonymity of "nowadays" and positive "anymore", Bob Cunningham
• Re: Green grow the grocer's oh...., izzy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Green grow the grocer's oh...., ArWeGod
  • Re: Green grow the grocer's oh...., CDB
• Re: Whazzit mean?, Tony Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Whazzit mean?, R H Draney
  • Re: Whazzit mean?, M. J. Powell
  • Re: Whazzit mean?, Ross Howard
    • Re: Whazzit mean?, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Whazzit mean?, Scotius
• Re: What is "old"?, Ross Howard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is "old"?, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Message not available
      • Re: What is "old"?, irwell
  • Re: What is "old"?, Jim Lawton
  • Re: What is "old"?, R H Draney
  • Re: What is "old"?, irwell
  • Re: What is "old"?, Skitt
    • Re: What is "old"?, The Other Fran
  • Re: What is "old"?, Ross Howard
    • Re: What is "old"?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: What is "old"?, Skitt
  • Re: What is "old"?, The Other Fran
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is "old"?, Mike Page
      • Re: What is "old"?, Linz
  • Re: What is "old"?, Mark Brader
    • Re: What is "old"?, Richard Ulrich
  • Re: What is "old"?, Joe Fineman
  • Re: What is "old"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
• may and can, Christian Christmann
  • Message not available
    • Re: may and can, designquest10
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: may and can, John Lawler
  • Re: may and can, Scotius
    • Re: may and can, Mark Brader
      • Re: may and can, Robert Lieblich
• Re: how to say "scannell", ray o'hara
  • Re: how to say "scannell", batdorf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how to say "scannell", Robert Lieblich
    • Re: how to say "scannell", nancy13g
      • Message not available
      • Regional Cosmetics Differences (was: how to say "scannell"), Salvatore Volatile
• I don't know exact meaning of the word "clear", grace
  • Re: I don't know exact meaning of the word "clear", John O'Flaherty
  • Re: I don't know exact meaning of the word "clear", ray o'hara
    • Re: I don't know exact meaning of the word "clear", Jim Lawton
  • Re: I don't know exact meaning of the word "clear", Scotius
• Re: Coop's Use of Positive Anymore, Tony Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Coop's Use of Positive Anymore, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Coop's Use of Positive Anymore, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coop's Use of Positive Anymore, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coop's Use of Positive Anymore, Maria Conlon
• Re: Unskunking, Joe Fineman
• Good Words Gone Bad, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
    • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Bertel Lund Hansen
    • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Chris Waigl
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, R H Draney
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, CDB
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Richard Bollard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, brians@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Ross Howard
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, brians@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, batdorf
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Raymond S. Wise
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Django Cat
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Ross Howard
    • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Chris Waigl
    • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Skitt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good Words Gone Bad, CDB
• Cummer gain?, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Cummer gain?, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: Cummer gain?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Cummer gain?, Frances Kemmish
  • Re: Cummer gain?, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cummer gain?, Peter Duncanson
  • Re: Cummer gain?, Don Phillipson
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cummer gain?, Steve Hayes
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cummer gain?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Cummer gain?, Chris Waigl
• Alphabetical order, Alan Jones
  • Re: Alphabetical order, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Alphabetical order, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Alphabetical order, Liz
    • Re: Alphabetical order, Liz
  • Re: Alphabetical order, Mark Brader
• Aussie Rules, Django Cat
  • Re: Aussie Rules, sage
    • Re: Aussie Rules, Django Cat
    • Re: Aussie Rules, Richard Bollard
  • Re: Aussie Rules, Richard Bollard
    • Message not available
      • Re: Aussie Rules, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aussie Rules, Skitt
      • Re: Aussie Rules, Mark Brader
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aussie Rules, Robert Lieblich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Aussie Rules, Richard Bollard
• Who Invented the Alphabet?, JF
  • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Ross Howard
    • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, John Dean
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, JF
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, JF
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, John Dean
  • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Nate Branscom
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, FB
    • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, William
      • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Mike Page
  • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, JF
  • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Serge Paccalin
  • Re: Who Invented the Alphabet?, Don Phillipson
• Re: lyrics: slimcea girl, Charles Riggs
  • Re: lyrics: slimcea girl, Richard Bollard
• Eggcorn forum, Chris Waigl
• Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Ted Schuerzinger
  • Message not available
    • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Chris Waigl
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", John Bauman
      • Pepys Diary Web site [was: Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Chris Waigl
      • [was Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: [was Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], Chris Waigl
      • Re: [was Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: [was Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], John Holmes
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Bob Cunningham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Steve Hayes
    • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Bob Cunningham
      • Intonation notation [was: Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays"], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Steve Hayes
    • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Robert Bannister
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Maria Conlon
      • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Steve Hayes
  • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Robert Bannister
    • Re: "we don't do that anymore nowadays", Bob Cunningham
• Real person, Arkadiusz Dymek
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real person, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Real person, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Real person, keithbc
  • Re: Real person, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Real person, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Real person, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Real person, Steve Hayes
• My CV, Paolo
  • Re: My CV, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: My CV, Paolo
      • Re: My CV, N. B. (substitute bay for gulf to e-mail)
      • Re: My CV, Nate Branscom
      • Re: My CV, Paolo
      • Re: My CV, Nate Branscom
      • Re: My CV, Paolo
      • Re: My CV, Nate Branscom
  • Re: My CV, Jim Lawton
    • Re: My CV, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: My CV, Paolo
      • Re: My CV, Jim Lawton
      • Re: My CV, Skitt
  • Re: My CV, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: My CV, Adrian Bailey
    • Re: My CV, TsuiDF
      • Message not available
      • Re: My CV, Paolo
  • Re: My CV, designquest10
    • Re: My CV, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: My CV, designquest10
      • Re: My CV, Robert Lieblich
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: My CV, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: My CV, designquest10
• "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, Mike Lyle
    • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, Mark Brader
  • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, designquest10
    • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, Ross Howard
  • Re: "Heavily" as an all-purpose intensifier, John O'Flaherty
• Halusian Gulp, dhk64
• LINDA WEST puts peoples names on moving contracts without there Knowledge. (925) 876-7441 Lwest@chipmancorp.com 925-825-5000, thefog
  • Re: LINDA WEST puts peoples names on moving contracts without there Knowledge. (925) 876-7441 Lwest@chipmancorp.com 925-825-5000, ray o'hara
  • Re: LINDA WEST puts peoples names on moving contracts without there Knowledge. (925) 876-7441 Lwest@chipmancorp.com 925-825-5000, Alan
• Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], R H Draney
  • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Maria Conlon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Tony Cooper
    • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], nancy13g
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Maria Conlon
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Skitt
      • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Robert Bannister
  • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], The Grammer Genious
    • Re: Positive "anymore" [was: Re: Stress and articulation [was: Re: "cannot" and "can not"]], Maria Conlon
• Re: translation problem about "as", grace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: translation problem about "as", Lars Eighner
• Question To A Phrase?, newbie_tw
  • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Lars Eighner
    • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Question To A Phrase?, CDB
    • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Robert Bannister
  • Re: Question To A Phrase?, designquest10
  • Message not available
    • Re: Question To A Phrase?, Nate Branscom
• Re: hello, Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: hello, Django Cat
    • Re: hello, R H Draney
• Elvis year, Holger Freese
• The ABC and the XYZ of after dinner speaking..., Troy Steadman
  • Re: The ABC and the XYZ of after dinner speaking..., izzy
    • Re: The ABC and the XYZ of after dinner speaking..., batdorf
• At Your Cervix, Reinhold (Rey) Aman
  • Re: At Your Cervix, Ross Howard
• Let's Gothicize, yo!, PR
  • Re: Let's Gothicize, yo!, Witziges Rätsel
• Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Raymond S. Wise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Will
    • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Richard R. Hershberger
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Richard R. Hershberger
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Donna Richoux
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, de781
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, de781
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, de781
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, de781
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: E-prime - mistake in Wikipedia, Richard Maurer
• Re: Irish broke, Tony Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Irish broke, CDB
    • Re: Irish broke, William
• Beamer?, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Beamer?, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Beamer?, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Message not available
      • Re: Beamer?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Beamer?, William
      • Re: Beamer?, TsuiDF
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Beamer?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Beamer?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Beamer?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Beamer?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Beamer?, Charles Riggs
• Blatant blunkettry, Ross Howard
  • Re: Blatant blunkettry, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Blatant blunkettry, John Dean
• 1930s English voice, Wood Avens
  • Re: 1930s English voice, Mike Lyle
  • Re: 1930s English voice, Peter Duncanson
• interpreter of, interpreter for, and interpreter to?, casioculture
  • Re: interpreter of, interpreter for, and interpreter to?, Mark Brader
• Re: Cover letter help, james
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cover letter help, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Cover letter help, Jim Lawton
• Withhold/Withstand, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Withhold/Withstand, ArWeGod
      • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Ross Howard
      • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Withhold/Withstand, Lars Eighner
• I am not a camel, Hanna Burdon
  • Re: I am not a camel, ray o'hara
    • Re: I am not a camel, batdorf
      • Re: I am not a camel, Django Cat
      • Re: I am not a camel, batdorf
  • Re: I am not a camel, Jim Lawton
  • Re: I am not a camel, Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: I am not a camel, mUs1Ka
    • Re: I am not a camel, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: I am not a camel, batdorf
      • Re: I am not a camel, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Prai Jei
      • Re: I am not a camel, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Jeffrey Turner
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Jim Lawton
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Wood Avens
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, TsuiDF
      • Re: I am not a camel, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: I am not a camel, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: I am not a camel, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: I am not a camel, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: I am not a camel, Rick Wotnaz
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: I am not a camel, ArWeGod
      • Re: I am not a camel, William
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Robin Bignall
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Robin Bignall
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: I am not a camel, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Tony Cooper
      • Re: I am not a camel, Mike Lyle
      • Re: I am not a camel, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: I am not a camel, R H Draney
      • Re: I am not a camel, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: I am not a camel, Ross Howard
      • Re: I am not a camel, JF
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: I am not a camel, batdorf
  • Re: I am not a camel, Peter Duncanson
    • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Hanna Burdon
      • Re: I am not a camel, ArWeGod
      • Re: I am not a camel, Donna Richoux
      • Re: I am not a camel, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Jim Lawton
      • Re: I am not a camel, Nate Branscom
      • Re: I am not a camel, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Message not available
      • Re: I am not a camel, Charles Riggs
  • Re: I am not a camel, Josh Norther
• Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora, Mark Brader
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora, Mark Brader
• Mixed Metafür, PR
  • Re: Mixed Metafür, William
  • Re: Mixed Metafür, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Mixed Metafür, R H Draney
    • Re: Mixed Metafür, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: Mixed Metafür, JF
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, Prai Jei
    • Re: Mixed Metafür, Prai Jei
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, R H Draney
    • Re: Mixed Metafür, nancy13g
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, Rick Wotnaz
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, Skitt
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, R H Draney
      • Re: Mixed Metafür, Joe Fineman
  • Re: Mixed Metafür, Jim Lawton
• Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Mark Brader
  • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", R H Draney
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Mike Lyle
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", ArWeGod
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Alan Jones
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Paul Wolff
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", R H Draney
  • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", J. J. Lodder
  • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Message not available
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Skitt
  • Message not available
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Yves Bellefeuille
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Jitze Couperus
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Mark Brader
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Martin Ambuhl
      • Message not available
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", ArWeGod
  • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Charles Riggs
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Paul Wolff
    • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Joe Fineman
      • Re: "kern", "kernel", "nucleus", "core", Robin Bignall
• Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
  • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, ray o'hara
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, N. B. (substitute bay for gulf to e-mail)
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, R H Draney
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Mark Brader
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Fred
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Rick Wotnaz
  • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
    • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Skitt
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, PR
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, William
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, R H Draney
  • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, PR
    • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, casioculture
      • Re: Can we please drop the letter Y?, Charles Riggs
• Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Rick Wotnaz
  • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, William
    • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, izzy
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, izzy
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, William
    • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Parrot dies: Guardian in self-restraint Shock, Paul Wolff
• myself, Donna Richoux
  • Re: myself, jo_tipson
    • Re: myself, Jim Lawton
  • Re: myself, PR
    • Re: myself, Lars Eighner
      • Re: myself, Raymond S. Wise
    • Re: myself, Robert Bannister
• Re: Olly olly ox and free, Mike Lyle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Olly olly ox and free, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: Olly olly ox and free, William
  • Re: Olly olly ox and free, Charles Riggs
• Hard cheese, er "g"s, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Hard cheese, er "g"s, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: Hard cheese, er "g"s, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Hard cheese, er "g"s, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Hard cheese, er "g"s, Prai Jei
• Re: difference between "each" and "every", Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: difference between "each" and "every", John Lawler
    • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Mike Lyle
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Tony Cooper
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Charles Riggs
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Maria Conlon
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", larrysulky
      • Re: difference between "each" and "every", Steve Hayes
• could have done with, Larry
  • Re: could have done with, Troy Steadman
    • Re: could have done with, Larry
      • Re: could have done with, Maria Conlon
  • Re: could have done with, Lars Eighner
  • Re: could have done with, ArWeGod
    • Re: could have done with, larrysulky
• Re: French and American lit - 1 attachment, Martin Ambuhl
• OT: Dying for a spot, The Other Fran
• Is this a new eggcorn - "grunt" vs. "brunt"?, nancy13g
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this a new eggcorn - "grunt" vs. "brunt"?, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this a new eggcorn - "grunt" vs. "brunt"?, Steve Hayes
• Re: Pure Imagination!, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: Pure Imagination!, de781
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pure Imagination!, John Dawkins
    • Message not available
      • Re: Pure Imagination!, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
  • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
    • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, JF
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, CDB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, CDB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, sigvald
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ross Howard
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, FB
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, J. W. Love
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Alan Jones
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
  • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Holger Metzger
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Skitt
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Skitt
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, William
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, the Omrud
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Per Rønne
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ross Howard
  • Message not available
    • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
  • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Arne H. Wilstrup
    • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Estuary English - how serious?, Charles Riggs
• about the word 'choice'., zhuyin . nju
  • Re: about the word 'choice'., Donna Richoux
  • Re: about the word 'choice'., Lars Eighner
    • Re: about the word 'choice'., Don Phillipson
      • Re: about the word 'choice'., Default User
    • Message not available
      • Re: about the word 'choice'., ArWeGod
  • Re: about the word 'choice'., Liz
• He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
  • Re: He must have been being interviewed, nancy13g
    • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, John Holmes
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Message not available
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Mike Lyle
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, ArWeGod
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, William
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Charles Riggs
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, nancy13g
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Mark Brader
  • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Lars Eighner
    • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
    • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Don Phillipson
    • Message not available
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Mike Lyle
      • Re: He must have been being interviewed, Arne H. Wilstrup
• How to pronounce "Trafalgar", Jim Lawton
  • Re: How to pronounce "Trafalgar", batdorf
• Culturally-specific words, The Other Fran
  • Re: Culturally-specific words, John Dean
    • Re: Culturally-specific words, CDB
  • Re: Culturally-specific words, FB
    • Message not available
      • Re: Culturally-specific words, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Culturally-specific words, Mark Brader
• non-committally speaking, The Other Fran
  • Re: non-committally speaking, John Dean
    • Message not available
      • Re: non-committally speaking, John Dean
      • Re: non-committally speaking, Mike Lyle
      • Re: non-committally speaking, the Omrud
  • Re: non-committally speaking, Peter Duncanson
• Re: England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, Mark Brader
  • Message not available
    • Re: England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, Mike Lyle
  • Message not available
    • Re: England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, M. J. Powell
      • Re: England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, J. J. Lodder
• Blighty, Laura F. Spira
  • Message not available
    • Re: Blighty, Mike Lyle
• Ancient lights............, irwell
  • Re: Ancient lights............, William
  • Re: Ancient lights............, John Dean
• Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Bob Cunningham
  • Message not available
    • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Will
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Will
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: Elocutionary punctuation lives!, Joe Fineman
• Comments?, de781
  • Re: Comments?, Alan
    • Re: Comments?, R H Draney
      • Re: Comments?, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Comments?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Comments?, de781
      • Re: Comments?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Comments?, de781
      • Re: Comments?, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Comments?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Comments?, ArWeGod
• Touches below, Mark Brader
  • Re: Touches below, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Touches below, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Touches below, Mark Brader
      • Re: Touches below, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Touches below, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Touches below, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Touches below, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Touches below, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Touches below, Rick Wotnaz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Touches below, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Touches below, Pat Durkin
      • Mark Israel's FAQ [WAS: Touches below], Donna Richoux
      • Re: Mark Israel's FAQ [WAS: Touches below], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Mark Israel's FAQ [WAS: Touches below], Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Mark Israel's FAQ [WAS: Touches below], Donna Richoux
      • Re: Touches below, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Touches below, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Touches below, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Touches below, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Touches below, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Touches below, Joe Fineman
• symptomless curves, Jim Lawton
  • Re: symptomless curves, Donna Richoux
    • Re: symptomless curves, Charles Riggs
      • Re: symptomless curves, mcv
      • Re: symptomless curves, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: symptomless curves, Prai Jei
  • Re: symptomless curves, Charles Riggs
• Yet another eggcorn (no, really), Ray Heindl
• Re: Best possible fee-based NNTP servers, costs??, R H Draney
  • Re: Best possible fee-based NNTP servers, costs??, Default User
• Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), Don Phillipson
  • Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), nancy13g
    • Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), Mike Lyle
    • Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), TakenEvent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Punctuation and/or Wording Help Needed --- Badly :-), Jim Lawton
• neglect and negligence, Ryan
  • Re: neglect and negligence, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: neglect and negligence, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• as part of any escalation to... what could that mean?`, KS
  • Re: as part of any escalation to... what could that mean?`, Troy Steadman
  • Re: as part of any escalation to... what could that mean?`, Jim Lawton
  • Re: as part of any escalation to... what could that mean?`, the Omrud
• cyberbole, Jim Lawton
  • Re: cyberbole, J. J. Lodder
    • Re: cyberbole, Mike Lyle
      • Re: cyberbole, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: cyberbole, Mike Lyle
      • Re: cyberbole, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: cyberbole, Mike Lyle
      • Re: cyberbole, Jim Lawton
      • Re: cyberbole, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: cyberbole, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: cyberbole, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: cyberbole, de781
      • Re: cyberbole, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Connect the dots, Lothar Frings
  • Re: Connect the dots, the Omrud
    • Re: Connect the dots, The Other Fran
    • Re: Connect the dots, batdorf
  • Re: Connect the dots, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Connect the dots, The Other Fran
• what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", kkang0009101
  • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", Jim Lawton
    • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", Weatherlawyer
      • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", Jim Lawton
      • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", CDB
  • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", Adrian Smith
  • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", J. J. Lodder
  • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", keithbc
    • Message not available
      • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", ArWeGod
      • Re: what's mean "she is cool as cucumber.", Robert Lieblich
• Skitt knows the answer, Robert Lieblich
• What this mean : set the record straight, linq936
  • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, Mark Brader
    • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, John Lawler
  • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, Lars Eighner
  • Re: What this mean : set the record straight, Jim Lawton
• What this "but" mean, linq936
  • Re: What this "but" mean, Mike Lyle
  • Re: What this "but" mean, FB
• " You're my sunshine" mean?, yuuigirl
  • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Troy Steadman
    • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, nancy13g
      • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Steve Hayes
    • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, R H Draney
  • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • " You're my sunshine" mean?, yuuigirl
    • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, CDB
      • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Mike Page
      • Message not available
      • Re: " You're my sunshine" mean?, Django Cat
• Need a term here:, Gordon Airporte
  • Re: Need a term here:, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Need a term here:, Liz
    • Re: Need a term here:, Gordon Airporte
      • Re: Need a term here:, Liz
      • Re: Need a term here:, John Lawler
      • Re: Need a term here:, Liz
    • Re: Need a term here:, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need a term here:, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, Nate Branscom
      • Re: Need a term here:, Nate Branscom
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, Nate Branscom
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Need a term here:, the Omrud
    • Re: Need a term here:, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Need a term here:, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Need a term here:, Gordon Airporte
      • Re: Need a term here:, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Need a term here:, the Omrud
  • Re: Need a term here:, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Need a term here:, William
  • Re: Need a term here:, eromlignod
    • Re: Need a term here:, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Need a term here:, the Omrud
      • Re: Need a term here:, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Need a term here:, Bob
      • Re: Need a term here:, Lanarcam
      • Re: Need a term here:, Bob
      • Re: Need a term here:, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Need a term here:, Don A. Gilmore
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Need a term here:, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Need a term here:, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, Don A. Gilmore
  • Re: Need a term here:, bxf
  • Re: Need a term here:, John Dean
    • Re: Need a term here:, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • if and whether [WAS: Need a term here:], Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need a term here:, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Need a term here:, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Need a term here:, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need a term here:, David Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need a term here:, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Need a term here:, TakenEvent
    • Re: Need a term here:, R H Draney
      • Re: Need a term here:, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Need a term here:, TakenEvent
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, TakenEvent
      • Re: Need a term here:, Claude Weil
      • Re: Need a term here:, R H Draney
      • Re: Need a term here:, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Need a term here:, Claude Weil
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
      • Re: Need a term here:, Claude Weil
      • Re: Need a term here:, Skitt
• nogster@gmail.com, nogster@xxxxxxxxx
  • Alô! from Brazil (WAS Re: nogster@gmail.com), Will
    • Re: Alô! from Brazil (WAS Re: nogster@gmail.com), nogster@xxxxxxxxx
• Possible eggcorn, Mike Lyle
• reticulated water, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: reticulated water, eromlignod
    • Re: reticulated water, Jim Lawton
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Jim Lawton
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, SouthSeas
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, SouthSeas
      • Re: reticulated water, Steve Hayes
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Jim Lawton
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: reticulated water, Don Aitken
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Steve Hayes
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Steve Hayes
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Re: reticulated water, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Steve Hayes
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Jim Lawton
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Re: reticulated water, JF
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, james
      • Re: reticulated water, Paul Wolff
      • Re: reticulated water, Don Aitken
      • Re: reticulated water, Paul Wolff
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Don Aitken
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: reticulated water, Tony Cooper
      • Re: reticulated water, Skitt
      • Re: reticulated water, Tony Cooper
      • Re: reticulated water, Skitt
      • Re: reticulated water, Tony Cooper
      • Re: reticulated water, Skitt
      • Re: reticulated water, Tony Cooper
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Paul Wolff
      • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Paul Wolff
      • Re: reticulated water, JF
      • Re: reticulated water, Jim Lawton
      • Re: reticulated water, Maria Conlon
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, William
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, the Omrud
      • Re: reticulated water, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: reticulated water, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: reticulated water, JF
      • Re: reticulated water, Mike Lyle
      • Re: reticulated water, John Holmes
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Skitt
      • Re: reticulated water, John Holmes
      • Re: reticulated water, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: reticulated water, Ray Heindl
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: reticulated water, CDB
      • Re: reticulated water, Donna Richoux
      • Re: reticulated water, Maria Conlon
      • Re: reticulated water, CDB
      • Re: reticulated water, Charles Riggs
      • Re: reticulated water, Maria Conlon
      • Re: reticulated water, Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: reticulated water, R H Draney
    • Re: reticulated water, Robert Bannister
      • Re: reticulated water, John Lawler
      • Re: reticulated water, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Address (was: reticulated water), Mark Brader
      • Re: reticulated water, Charles Riggs
    • Re: reticulated water, Charles Riggs
  • Re: reticulated water, Steve Hayes
• Wall scones, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Wall scones, Steve Hayes
• plurals of foreign words, goodbyekitty2005
  • Re: plurals of foreign words, Donna Richoux
  • Re: plurals of foreign words, Prai Jei
  • Re: plurals of foreign words, Adrian Bailey
• This is bad!, Will
  • Re: This is bad!, Will
  • Re: This is bad!, Jim Lawton
    • Re: This is bad!, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: This is bad!, Jim Lawton
      • Re: This is bad!, CDB
      • Re: This is bad!, Sara Lorimer
  • Re: This is bad!, Tony Cooper
    • Re: This is bad!, the Omrud
      • Re: This is bad!, Jim Lawton
    • Re: This is bad!, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, the Omrud
      • Re: This is bad!, Mark Brader
      • Re: This is bad!, the Omrud
      • Re: This is bad!, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: This is bad!, the Omrud
    • Re: This is bad!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: This is bad!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: This is bad!, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: This is bad!, Tony Cooper
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Re: US cell phones, Tony Cooper
      • Re: US cell phones, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: US cell phones, Maria Conlon
      • Re: US cell phones, Tony Cooper
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Re: US cell phones, ArWeGod
      • Re: US cell phones, Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], Donna Richoux
      • Re: de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], Scotius
      • Re: de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], Donna Richoux
      • Re: de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: de rigueur, rigeur [WAS: US cell phones], JF
      • Re: US cell phones, Mike Lyle
      • Re: US cell phones, Donna Richoux
      • Re: US cell phones, Mike Lyle
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: US cell phones, ArWeGod
      • Re: US cell phones, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: US cell phones, Mike Lyle
      • Re: US cell phones, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: US cell phones, John Dean
      • Re: US cell phones, Donna Richoux
      • Re: US cell phones, Armond Perretta
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: US cell phones, Skitt
      • Re: US cell phones, Charles Riggs
      • Re: US cell phones, Linz
      • Re: US cell phones, Donna Richoux
      • Re: US cell phones, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Re: US cell phones, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Message not available
      • Re: US cell phones, TakenEvent
      • Re: US cell phones, John Dean
      • Re: This is bad!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: This is bad!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: This is bad!, Jim Lawton
      • Re: This is bad!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: This is bad!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Sara Lorimer
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, Graeme Thomas
      • Message not available
      • Re: This is bad!, JF
      • Re: This is bad!, Skitt
      • Re: This is bad!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: This is bad!, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: This is bad!, Rick Wotnaz
      • Re: This is bad!, JF
      • Re: This is bad!, Maria Conlon
      • Re: This is bad!, JF
• He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Adrian Smith
    • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, brickswanted
  • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, ray o'hara
    • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Will
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, ray o'hara
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, de781
    • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, R H Draney
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Maria Conlon
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, R H Draney
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Mark Brader
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, R H Draney
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Mike Lyle
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Alan Jones
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Tony Cooper
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Maria Conlon
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Tony Cooper
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Paul Wolff
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Skitt
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, ArWeGod
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Skitt
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Richard Ulrich
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, R H Draney
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, Earle Jones
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, R H Draney
      • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, John Holmes
  • Re: He asked for a 13, but they drew a 31, batdorf
• BrE vs AmE (dates and names), KS
  • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), KS
    • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Message not available
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Steve Hayes
  • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Don Phillipson
  • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), The Other Fran
    • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Bob Martin
    • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Tony Cooper
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), The Other Fran
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Tony Cooper
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), No Spam
  • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Charles Riggs
    • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Adam Maass
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), The Other Fran
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), The Other Fran
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Mike Lyle
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Mike Lyle
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Maria Conlon
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Earle Jones
      • Re: BrE vs AmE (dates and names), Don Phillipson
• Meaning of "How are your parts?", caliban
  • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", Lars Eighner
    • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", Alec McKenzie
      • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", R H Draney
      • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", Pat Durkin
  • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", William
  • Re: Meaning of "How are your parts?", Earle Jones
• Honesty and self-confidence, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Honesty and self-confidence, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Honesty and self-confidence, Charles Riggs
• If I Were the Copy Editor..., Maria Conlon
  • OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Robert Lieblich
    • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Armond Perretta
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Armond Perretta
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Maria Conlon
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Ray Heindl
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], the Omrud
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Default User
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Maria Conlon
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Armond Perretta
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Maria Conlon
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mark Brader
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Skitt
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Charles Riggs
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT, Tony Cooper
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Latch (was: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: ...), Mark Brader
      • Re: Latch (was: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: ...), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Latch (was: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: ...), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Latch (was: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: ...), Alan Jones
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Default User
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], The Grammer Genious
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], R H Draney
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Who's running the NYT [was Re: If I Were the Copy Editor...], Mike Lyle
  • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Robert Lieblich
    • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Andrew Usher
    • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Charles Riggs
  • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Joe Fineman
    • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Skitt
      • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., John O'Flaherty
      • Message not available
      • Re: If I Were the Copy Editor..., Skitt
• Re: Inky Dinky Dinky Do, echo
• Re: speaking online dictionaries, Donna Richoux
  • Re: speaking online dictionaries, Skitt
    • Re: speaking online dictionaries, tkjazzer
      • Re: speaking online dictionaries, R H Draney
    • Re: speaking online dictionaries, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: speaking online dictionaries, Maria Conlon
• Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, R H Draney
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, Skitt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, William
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, de781
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, William
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, Jordan Abel
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, R H Draney
• Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, batdorf
• Bespoke, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Bespoke, Skitt
    • Re: Bespoke, R H Draney
      • Re: Bespoke, Skitt
      • Re: Bespoke, John Dean
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Bespoke, Wood Avens
    • Re: Bespoke, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: Bespoke, John Dean
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Bespoke, Django Cat
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Bespoke, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Bespoke, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Bespoke, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Bespoke, CDB
      • Re: Bespoke, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Bespoke, Steve Hayes
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Bespoke, Default User
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, the Omrud
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, the Omrud
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Alan Jones
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Page
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Linz
      • Re: Bespoke, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Bespoke, Alan Jones
      • Re: Bespoke, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Alan Jones
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Bespoke, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Bespoke, R H Draney
      • Re: Bespoke, John Dean
      • Re: Bespoke, Peter Duncanson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], Charles Riggs
      • Re: Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], JF
      • Re: Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Victorians [Was:Re: Bespoke], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, John Lawler
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, nancy13g
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Richard Bollard
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Skitt
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Alan Jones
      • Re: Bespoke, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Bespoke, Jeffrey Turner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bespoke, R H Draney
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Bespoke, R J Valentine
      • Re: Bespoke, Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, William
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, William
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Bespoke, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Bespoke, William
      • Re: Bespoke, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Bespoke, Skitt
      • Re: Bespoke, Skitt
      • Re: Bespoke, K. Edgcombe
      • Re: Bespoke, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Bespoke, the Omrud
      • Re: Bespoke, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Bespoke, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: Bespoke, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Bespoke, the Omrud
      • Re: Bespoke, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bespoke, R H Draney
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bespoke, Mark Brader
  • Re: Bespoke, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bespoke, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Bespoke, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: Bespoke, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Bespoke, Jim Lawton
• Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Laura F. Spira
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, de781
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, de781
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, R H Draney
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, de781
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Skitt
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Don Aitken
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-español-ingles, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Mejor pagina de internet traductora ingles-es, R H Draney
• Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Mike Page
  • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Mike Page
    • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, the Omrud
    • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Mike Page
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, nancy13g
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Skitt
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, R H Draney
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Stewart Gordon
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Mike Page
  • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Jim Lawton
  • Message not available
    • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, Armond Perretta
  • Message not available
    • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, sage
      • Re: Halifax (NS) boink anyone?, CDB
• Re: Coop's balls, Salvatore Volatile
• Re: "many thanks" ?, John Dean
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "many thanks" ?, Mike Page
  • Re: "many thanks" ?, Django Cat
• Re: How to Pronounce "Euthyphro"?, Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to Pronounce "Euthyphro"?, Jim Lawton
• From : <lwest@chipmancorp.com>, thefog
• Re: modicum or medium, Steve Hayes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: modicum or medium, larrysulky
• U, PR
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: U, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: U, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: U, the Omrud
• Who can revise essays for me?, thymidine
  • Re: Who can revise essays for me?, Gerald Smyth
• The Taikonauts, irwell
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Taikonauts, Peter Moylan
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Mike Page
      • Re: The Taikonauts, batdorf
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Taikonauts, Jukka Aho
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Taikonauts, Jukka Aho
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: The Taikonauts, batdorf
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Mike Lyle
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Chris Waigl
      • Re: The Taikonauts, batdorf
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: The Taikonauts, batdorf
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: The Taikonauts, batdorf
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Taikonauts, TsuiDF
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Taikonauts, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Re: Texas is no more, Joe Fineman
  • Re: Texas is no more, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Texas is no more, Steve Hayes
    • Re: Texas is no more, Joe Fineman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Texas is no more, Steve Hayes
• Equipments, Christian Weisgerber
  • Re: Equipments, Don Phillipson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Equipments, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Equipments, Arcadian Rises
      • Re: Equipments, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Equipments, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Equipments, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: Equipments, Earle Jones
      • Re: Equipments, Ted Schuerzinger
• Subbing/copy-editing standards at BBC News site, Ross Howard
  • Re: Subbing/copy-editing standards at BBC News site, William
  • Re: Subbing/copy-editing standards at BBC News site, Donna Richoux
• "had a British accent", casioculture
  • Re: "had a British accent", Peter Duncanson
  • Re: "had a British accent", Django Cat
    • Re: "had a British accent", William
    • Re: "had a British accent", Robert Bannister
      • Re: "had a British accent", R H Draney
      • Re: "had a British accent", Skitt
      • Re: "had a British accent", J. J. Lodder
• one sentence, dont know what does it mean, walker
  • Re: one sentence, dont know what does it mean, Bob
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: one sentence, dont know what does it mean, walker
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: one sentence, dont know what does it mean, Jim Lawton
• Clever phishing, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Clever phishing, Gerald Smyth
    • Re: Clever phishing, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Clever phishing, M. J. Powell
  • Re: Clever phishing, David Taylor
    • Re: Clever phishing, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Clever phishing, Skitt
      • Re: Clever phishing, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Clever phishing, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Clever phishing, Two English Faggots
    • Re: Clever phishing, Skitt
  • Re: Clever phishing, Adrian Bailey
    • Re: Clever phishing, Steve Hayes
  • Message not available
    • Re: Clever phishing, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Message not available
    • Re: Clever phishing, Mike Barnes
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Clever phishing, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Clever phishing, Adrian Smith
      • Re: Clever phishing, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Clever phishing, M. J. Powell
• The length of a cubit, Charles Riggs
  • Re: The length of a cubit, R H Draney
    • Re: The length of a cubit, Ross Howard
  • Re: The length of a cubit, William
• Re: Back To Basics, Please -- _The Elements Of Style_, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Back To Basics, Please -- _The Elements Of Style_, No Spam
• Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
  • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, nancy13g
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jared
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Joe Fineman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, nancy13g
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Pat Durkin
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mark Brader
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles, N. B. (substitute bay for gulf to e-mail)
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), William
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Tony Cooper
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Liz
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Electric kettles, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Electric kettles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Electric kettles, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Electric kettles, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Electric kettles, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Electric kettles, CDB
      • Re: Electric kettles, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Electric kettles, CDB
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles, JF
      • Re: Electric kettles, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Electric kettles, Peter Duncanson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Peter Duncanson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Paul Wolff
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Steve Hayes
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mark Browne
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Robin Bignall
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mark Brader
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mark Brader
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Charles Riggs
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Electric kettles, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mark Brader
      • Re: Electric kettles (was: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?), Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Don Phillipson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, William
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, William
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, William
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, J. J. Lodder
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, William
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, SouthSeas
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, John Dean
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ross Howard
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Page
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Page
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Page
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Paul Wolff
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Page
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, John Dean
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Page
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, james
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, JF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, R H Draney
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Robin Bignall
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Wood Avens
      • Eccentrics [wasRe: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?], Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Eccentrics [wasRe: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Skitt
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Perfect-Soldier
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Laura F. Spira
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Peter Moylan
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Spehro Pefhany
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Adrian Bailey
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, John Dean
    • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Toast Soldiers - non-standard usage?, Ted Schuerzinger
• Two questions from song lyrics, Lothar Frings
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Troy Steadman
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Jim Lawton
    • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, William
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Earle Jones
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, R H Draney
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Laura F. Spira
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Peter Moylan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, The Other Fran
  • Message not available
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Mark Brader
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, Ross Howard
    • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Two questions from song lyrics, TakenEvent
• Alan wrote:, thefog
  • Re: Alan wrote:, Skitt
• Looking for a word I can't recall, eviedeevie
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Ted Schuerzinger
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Arcadian Rises
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, TakenEvent
    • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, CDB
      • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, CDB
      • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, TakenEvent
      • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Laura F. Spira
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Don Phillipson
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Arcadian Rises
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, Claude Weil
  • Re: Looking for a word I can't recall, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Get in there, get the job done, and get out", R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Get in there, get the job done, and get out", J . Eric Durbin
• Intro F: Contents of AUE FAQ and FAQ Supplement, Donna Richoux
• Questions about an editorial, Lee Hon Chor
  • Re: Questions about an editorial, Tony Cooper
  • Re: Questions about an editorial, Peter Duncanson
    • Re: Questions about an editorial, Peter Duncanson
  • Re: Questions about an editorial, CDB
  • Re: Questions about an editorial, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Questions about an editorial, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Questions about an editorial, Jeff Chapman
  • Re: Questions about an editorial, FB
• [OT] (or is it?) Sunday Humo[u]r, Maria Conlon
  • Re: [OT] (or is it?) Sunday Humo[u]r, R H Draney
  • Re: [OT] (or is it?) Sunday Humo[u]r, Prai Jei
  • Re: [OT] (or is it?) Sunday Humo[u]r, Pritsy
• Re: LINDA WEST likes to commit Fraud & Forgery of CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 LWEST@chipmancorp.com 925-825-5000, R H Draney
  • Re: LINDA WEST likes to commit Fraud & Forgery of CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 LWEST@chipmancorp.com 925-825-5000, de781
• LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, thefog
  • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, Fred
  • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, Alan
    • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, de781
    • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, ray o'hara
    • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, thefog
      • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, Alan
      • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, de781
      • Re: LINDA WEST Fraud & Forgery CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES (925) 876-7441 925-825-5000, Jim Lawton
• It's and there's, Django Cat
  • Re: It's and there's, ray o'hara
    • Re: It's and there's, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: It's and there's, ray o'hara
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Donna Richoux
      • Re: It's and there's, Robert Bannister
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Skitt
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: It's and there's, Skitt
      • Re: It's and there's, Charles Riggs
    • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
  • Re: It's and there's, Bob
    • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
  • Re: It's and there's, Don Phillipson
    • Re: It's and there's, TsuiDF
    • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Donna Richoux
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Holger Metzger
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, Django Cat
      • Re: It's and there's, nancy13g
  • Re: It's and there's, John Dean
  • Re: It's and there's, John Lawler
    • Re: It's and there's, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's and there's, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's and there's, Raymond S. Wise
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's and there's, CDB
  • Re: It's and there's, Robert Bannister
    • Message not available
      • Re: It's and there's, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: It's and there's, Evan Kirshenbaum
• What's that, J. W. Love
  • Re: What's that, Maria Conlon
    • Re: What's that, J. W. Love
      • Re: What's that, Skitt
      • Re: What's that, Django Cat
      • Re: What's that, Robin Bignall
      • Re: What's that, Django Cat
      • Re: What's that, TsuiDF
• "Polls close...", Maria Conlon
  • Re: "Polls close...", John O'Flaherty
  • Re: "Polls close...", Armond Perretta
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Polls close...", Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Re: "Polls close...", R H Draney
  • Re: "Polls close...", Mark Brader
  • Re: "Polls close...", Don Phillipson
  • Re: "Polls close...", John Dean
• 's or not?, SebB
  • Re: 's or not?, miajunior333
    • Re: 's or not?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: 's or not?, Mark Brader
      • Re: 's or not?, SebB
      • Re: 's or not?, Wood Avens
      • Re: 's or not?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: 's or not?, CDB
      • Re: 's or not?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: 's or not?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: 's or not?, Charles Riggs
• In dear Dublin city, Charles Riggs
  • Re: In dear Dublin city, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: In dear Dublin city, Charles Riggs
• Today's AUE Boredom Index, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, de781
  • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, de781
  • Re: Today's AUE Boredom Index, J. J. Lodder
• Re: Idioms Theory, izzy
  • Re: Idioms Theory, CDB
    • Re: Idioms Theory, Don Aitken
      • Re: Idioms Theory, CDB
  • Re: Idioms Theory, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Idioms Theory, izzy
• Evolution of Language, Tom Robertson
  • Re: Evolution of Language, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Evolution of Language, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Harvey Van Sickle
      • "Bus", "autobus", "omnibus" [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "Bus", "autobus", "omnibus", Joe Fineman
      • "'bus" and "'phone" [was: Re: "Bus", "autobus", "omnibus"], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Carmen L. Abruzzi
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Holger Metzger
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Evolution of Language, the Omrud
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Matti Lamprhey
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Skitt
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
      • Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Mike Lyle
      • Re: Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Robert Bannister
      • Re: Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], JF
      • Re: Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Robert Bannister
      • Re: Horse-drawn "taxi"? [was: Re: Evolution of Language], William
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Don Phillipson
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Matthew Huntbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ambiguity of "quit" [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ambiguity of "quit" [was: Re: Evolution of Language], R J Valentine
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Skitt
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Lanarcam
      • Re: Evolution of Language, R H Draney
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Steve Hayes
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Evolution of Language, R J Valentine
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Raymond S. Wise
  • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Evolution of Language, Tom Robertson
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Don Aitken
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Evolution of Language, John Dean
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Skitt
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Evolution of Language, Charles Riggs
      • "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], R H Draney
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Ross Howard
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Maria Conlon
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Donna Richoux
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Robert Lieblich
      • plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Donna Richoux
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Donna Richoux
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], nancy13g
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Donna Richoux
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Pat Durkin
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Brian Wickham
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: plunked for [WAS: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited], Donna Richoux
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Ross Howard
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Charles Riggs
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Robert Bannister
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], N. B. (substitute bay for gulf to e-mail)
      • Message not available
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Donna Richoux
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Peter Duncanson
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Skitt
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Peter Moylan
      • Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Ross Howard
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Donna Richoux
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], William
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Alan Jones
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Maria Conlon
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Tony Cooper
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Robert Bannister
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Robert Bannister
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, R H Draney
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Mike Page
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was:, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Jordan Abel
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Jordan Abel
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Jordan Abel
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • "cromulent" and such [was: Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Jordan Abel
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Iain
      • Message not available
      • Re: Peace proposal, R H Draney
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Skitt
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Ross Howard
      • Re: Peace proposal [was: Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language]], Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], R J Valentine
      • Re: "email" vs "e-mail" revisited [was: Re: Evolution of Language], sage
    • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
  • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
  • Re: Evolution of Language, Carmen L. Abruzzi
  • Re: Evolution of Language, Peter Moylan
    • Re: Evolution of Language, Mark Brader
    • Re: Evolution of Language, Iain
• kk, very cranky
• Blessings from above, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Blessings from above, Tony Cooper
    • Re: Blessings from above, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Blessings from above, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Blessings from above, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Blessings from above, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Blessings from above, Charles Riggs
• A call for an embargo on objections, Charles Riggs
  • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Jim Lawton
    • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Charles Riggs
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Tony Cooper
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Charles Riggs
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, R H Draney
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, ray o'hara
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Maria Conlon
      • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Charles Riggs
  • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: A call for an embargo on objections, Charles Riggs
• Re: Sayings, Jitze Couperus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sayings, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Sayings, Adrian Smith
  • Re: Sayings, Don Phillipson
    • Re: Sayings, Adrian Smith
  • Re: Sayings, Troy Steadman
    • Re: Sayings, Pat Durkin
      • Re: Sayings, Robin Bignall
    • Re: Sayings, Adrian Smith
  • Re: Sayings, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: Sayings, Adrian Smith
• Re: "Doggy bag", Lars Eighner
  • Re: "Doggy bag", DB.
    • Re: "Doggy bag", Donna Richoux
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Josh Norther
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Donna Richoux
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Harvey Van Sickle
      • ad, Tony Cooper
      • Re: ad, Maria Conlon
      • Re: ad, Tony Cooper
      • Re: ad, Skitt
      • Re: ad, Ross Howard
      • Re: ad, Skitt
      • Re: ad, R H Draney
      • Re: ad, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "Doggy bag", de781
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Steve Hayes
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Mark Brader
    • Re: "Doggy bag", Skitt
    • Re: "Doggy bag", Karl Reinhardt
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Pat Durkin
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Robin Bignall
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Skitt
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Mark Brader
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Steve Hayes
      • Re: "Doggy bag", William
  • Re: "Doggy bag", Don Phillipson
    • Re: "Doggy bag", Lars Eighner
      • Re: "Doggy bag", Tony Cooper
      • Re: "Doggy bag", sage
      • Re: "Doggy bag", M. J. Powell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Doggy bag", Steve Hayes
    • Re: "Doggy bag", de781
  • Re: "Doggy bag", de781
• Thanks for having me on, Josh Norther
  • Re: Thanks for having me on, Skitt
    • Re: Thanks for having me on, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Thanks for having me on, de781
      • Re: Thanks for having me on, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Thanks for having me on, R H Draney
    • Re: Thanks for having me on, Prai Jei
  • Re: Thanks for having me on, Steve Hayes
• Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
  • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, J. W. Love
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
  • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Prai Jei
    • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, J. W. Love
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, J. W. Love
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Prai Jei
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, R H Draney
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Maria Conlon
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Skitt
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, de781
      • Re: Bad Usage of Commas BLOWS!!!!, Prai Jei
• Re: Kids say the darndest things, de781
  • Re: Kids say the darndest things, Jitze Couperus
    • Re: Kids say the darndest things, de781
      • Re: Kids say the darndest things, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Kids say the darndest things, Jitze Couperus
  • Re: Kids say the darndest things, The Other Fran
    • Re: Kids say the darndest things, de781
• Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Don Phillipson
    • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Default User
    • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Charles Riggs
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Skitt
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Maria Conlon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Skitt
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", N. B. (substitute bay for gulf to e-mail)
    • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Charles Riggs
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", victorkor
    • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Default User
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", keithbc
      • Re: Beginning The Last Sentence of a Series with"And", Robert Lieblich
• Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Rick Wotnaz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Don Phillipson
    • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Steve Hayes
  • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Francesc
    • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Rick Wotnaz
      • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Francesc
    • Re: Connotations and associations on "slant" word., Don Phillipson
• Quality holiday spots, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Quality holiday spots, William
  • Re: Quality holiday spots, R H Draney
    • Re: Quality holiday spots, Ross Howard
      • Re: Quality holiday spots, the Omrud
      • Re: Quality holiday spots, the Omrud
  • Re: Quality holiday spots, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Quality holiday spots, William
      • Re: Quality holiday spots, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Quality holiday spots, Pat Durkin
    • Re: Quality holiday spots, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Quality holiday spots, Tony Cooper
• Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling, Iain
    • Re: Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling, Iain
      • Real Spelling [WAS: Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling], Donna Richoux
      • Re: Real Spelling [WAS: Intro E: Mini-FAQ on Spelling], Iain
• who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, google
  • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, brians@xxxxxxx
    • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, The Other Fran
      • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, R H Draney
    • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
  • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, Jim Lawton
    • Message not available
      • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, John Holmes
  • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, Bob G
  • Re: who can help me paraphrase this long sentence?, Charles Riggs
• punctuation, Christian Christmann
  • Re: punctuation, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: punctuation, Ross Howard
      • Re: punctuation, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: punctuation, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: punctuation, Chris Waigl
      • Re: punctuation, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: punctuation, Ross Howard
      • "deceptive" or "misleading"? [was: Re: punctuation], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: punctuation, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
      • Re: punctuation, John_Kane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: punctuation, Raymond S. Wise
      • Re: punctuation, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: punctuation, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: punctuation, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: punctuation, R H Draney
      • Re: punctuation, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: punctuation, Don Phillipson
• "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", gloria0402
  • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", CDB
    • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Skitt
  • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Mark Brader
    • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", John Holmes
      • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Skitt
      • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", John Holmes
  • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Robert Bannister
    • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Charles Riggs
  • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Alan
  • Message not available
    • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", gloria0402
      • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Liz
      • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Mark Brader
      • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", Liz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", gloria0402
    • Re: "an 18-hour surgery" or "18-hour surgery", J. W. Love
• Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, ray o'hara
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, John Dean
    • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, CDB
    • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Michèle°
    • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Alec McKenzie
  • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Jitze Couperus
    • Re: Origin of "His Nibbs"?, Prai Jei
• Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Charles Riggs
  • Message not available
    • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Ross Howard
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Alan
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Alan
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Don Aitken
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Alan
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Ray Heindl
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Skitt
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Peter Moylan
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, mUs1Ka
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, David Taylor
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, sage
  • Message not available
    • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, J. J. Lodder
  • Message not available
    • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Peter Moylan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What do you call the steering wheel of a ship?, Alan
• Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Spehro Pefhany
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Theodore Heise
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Pat Durkin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Ed S
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Bob G
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Bob G
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, nancy13g
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Ed S
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Ross Howard
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Bob G
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Ross Howard
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, retrosorter
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, R H Draney
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, R H Draney
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Skitt
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Skitt
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Nick
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
    • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Linz
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, R H Draney
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, John Dean
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, R H Draney
      • Message not available
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, the Omrud
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Earle Jones
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: How many Americans know the word 'cheeky' as meaning impudent?, Evan Kirshenbaum
• OT: Long story, a mere diversion, Will
  • Message not available
    • Re: Tree-ing, Joe Fineman
      • Re: Tree-ing, Mark Brader
      • Re: Tree-ing, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Tree-ing, J. W. Love
      • Re: Tree-ing, Donna Richoux
      • Re: Tree-ing, Mark Brader
  • Message not available
    • Re: Tree-ing (was: OT: Long story, a mere diversion), Will
• What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, news.xtra.co.nz
  • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Will
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Maria Conlon
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Bob Martin
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Sara Lorimer
  • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, K. Edgcombe
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Mike Page
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Jim Lawton
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, K. Edgcombe
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, nancy13g
      • Re: What is the proper word for some meaningless text, but necessary to keep main body relevant?, Harvey Van Sickle
• Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", gloria0402
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Gerald Smyth
    • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", The Other Fran
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", The Other Fran
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Jim Lawton
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Jim Lawton
    • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", J. W. Love
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", CDB
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Charles Riggs
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", J. W. Love
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", nancy13g
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Ross Howard
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", nancy13g
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Ross Howard
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", the Omrud
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Skitt
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
      • Gladly [WAS: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour"], Donna Richoux
      • Re: Gladly [WAS: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour"], the Omrud
      • Re: Gladly [WAS: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour"], Donna Richoux
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Tony Cooper
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", J. W. Love
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", CDB
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", J. W. Love
    • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", gloria0402
      • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Matti Lamprhey
  • Re: Should I put "a" or "an" before "18-hour", Stewart Gordon
• monolith => Trinacria, izzy
• question about women's names, trevor_smithson
  • Re: question about women's names, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: question about women's names, Maria Conlon
      • Re: question about women's names, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: question about women's names, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: question about women's names, William
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: question about women's names, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: question about women's names, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: question about women's names, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: question about women's names, Skitt
      • Re: question about women's names, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: question about women's names, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: question about women's names, Mark Browne
      • Re: question about women's names, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: question about women's names, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: question about women's names, Alec Kojaev
      • Re: question about women's names, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: question about women's names, Skitt
      • Re: question about women's names, Alec Kojaev
      • Re: question about women's names, R H Draney
    • Re: question about women's names, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Re: question about women's names, Charles Riggs
      • Re: question about women's names, Arcadian Rises
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Bannister
    • Re: question about women's names, Alan Jones
      • Re: question about women's names, Skitt
      • Re: question about women's names, Arcadian Rises
      • Re: question about women's names, Don Aitken
    • Message not available
      • Re: question about women's names, Arcadian Rises
  • Re: question about women's names, TakenEvent
    • Re: question about women's names, TsuiDF
      • Re: question about women's names, William
      • Re: question about women's names, TsuiDF
      • Re: question about women's names, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Bannister
      • Re: question about women's names, TakenEvent
      • Re: question about women's names, Skitt
      • Re: question about women's names, Peter Moylan
      • Re: question about women's names, TsuiDF
      • Message not available
      • Re: question about women's names, Peter Moylan
      • Re: question about women's names, Robert Bannister
      • Re: question about women's names, Charles Riggs
• bad camera, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: bad camera, R H Draney
    • Re: bad camera, Tony Cooper
      • Re: bad camera, Charles Riggs
  • Re: bad camera, the Omrud
    • Re: bad camera, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: bad camera, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: bad camera, Skitt
      • Re: bad camera, Charles Riggs
      • Re: bad camera, R H Draney
      • Re: bad camera, irwell
      • Message not available
      • Re: bad camera, Ray Heindl
  • Re: bad camera, Armond Perretta
    • Re: bad camera, irwell
    • Re: bad camera, Jitze Couperus
      • Re: bad camera, John O'Flaherty
      • Re: bad camera, Ray Heindl
  • Re: bad camera, Evan Kirshenbaum
• Must have been (?), Walsky
  • Re: Must have been (?), Pat Durkin
    • Re: Must have been (?), The Other Fran
      • Re: Must have been (?), Walsky
• Re: idioms, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: idioms, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: idioms, izzy
• Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, R H Draney
  • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Stewart Gordon
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Skitt
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, John Holmes
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Don Phillipson
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Spehro Pefhany
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, R H Draney
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
    • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Joe Fineman
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, R H Draney
  • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
    • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, Prai Jei
      • Re: Octopi, octopodes, octopora, oh the hell with it!, de781
• gypsy as a verb, retrosorter
  • Re: gypsy as a verb, John Dean
  • Re: gypsy as a verb, William
    • Message not available
      • Re: gypsy as a verb, Paul Draper
• Re: About baseball word 'bull pen' and 'duck out'., Default User
  • Re: About baseball word 'bull pen' and 'duck out'., Robert Lieblich
• Copycat, minheeya
  • Re: Copycat, Don Phillipson
• Re: What's the phrase "My shoes fall in love with my dog"?, Troy Steadman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's the phrase "My shoes fall in love with my dog"?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: What's the phrase "My shoes fall in love with my dog"?, CDB
  • Re: What's the phrase "My shoes fall in love with my dog"?, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Re: What's the phrase "My shoes fall in love with my dog"?, Django Cat
• inquiry, satendraonly4u@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: inquiry, Donna Richoux
    • Re: inquiry, Jim Lawton
    • Re: inquiry, Charles Riggs
  • Re: inquiry, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: inquiry, the Omrud
      • Re: inquiry, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: inquiry, the Omrud
  • Re: inquiry, Steve Hayes
    • Re: inquiry, Sara Lorimer
• Even more eggcorns -- utmost, The Other Fran
  • Re: Even more eggcorns -- utmost, Ross Howard
• Australians' use of the word "wog", Will
  • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", The Other Fran
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Jim Lawton
  • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Arfur Million
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Arfur Million
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Will
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Tony Cooper
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", The Other Fran
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", The Other Fran
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Adam Grinter
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", The Other Fran
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Mike Lyle
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", CDB
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Donna Richoux
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", CDB
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", the Omrud
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Wood Avens
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", CDB
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", CDB
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", CDB
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Jitze Couperus
      • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", The Other Fran
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", TsuiDF
  • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Steve Hayes
  • Message not available
    • Re: Australians' use of the word "wog", Robert Bannister
• Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, google
  • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Troy Steadman
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Donalbain
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, CDB
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Donalbain
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, William
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Donalbain
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, R H Draney
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Steve Hayes
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Matthew Huntbach
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Linz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Mike Page
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Mike Page
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, William
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Graeme Thomas
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Skitt
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, TsuiDF
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Graeme Thomas
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Spehro Pefhany
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Numeromania
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
  • Message not available
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Troy Steadman
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Ted Schuerzinger
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, de781
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, William
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Don Aitken
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, William
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Don Aitken
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Ross Howard
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Ross Howard
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Mike Page
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Mike Page
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Django Cat
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, John Dean
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Robert Bannister
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Default User
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Don Phillipson
      • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, Tony Cooper
  • Message not available
    • Re: Can we say "Good morning, teacher"?, the Omrud
• Oh, right, jm_1951
• Would you?, Weatherlawyer
  • Re: Would you?, de781
    • Re: Would you?, Weatherlawyer
  • Message not available
    • Re: Would you?, Alan
• A Disturbing Incident, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Matti Lamprhey
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Skitt
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Skitt
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, de781
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, ray o'hara
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Salvatore Volatile
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Armond Perretta
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, CDB
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, de781
  • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Sara Lorimer
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Steve Hayes
      • Plant, Steve Hayes
      • Re: Plant, Adrian Bailey
      • Re: Plant, Steve Hayes
      • Re: Plant, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Plant, Alan Jones
      • Re: Plant, Steve Hayes
      • Message not available
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Robert Lieblich
      • Message not available
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Ray Heindl
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Mark Brader
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Message not available
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, de781
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Pat Durkin
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: A Disturbing Incident, John Holmes
    • Re: A Disturbing Incident, Salvatore Volatile
  • Re: A Disturbing Incident, de781
• Intro D: Mini-FAQ on Grammar, Usage & Punctuation, Donna Richoux
• When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Juuitchan
  • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, R H Draney
    • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Fred
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, TakenEvent
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, Maria Conlon
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, TakenEvent
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, Maria Conlon
      • Re: toilets, bathrooms, and liquatoriums, Steve Hayes
    • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Arcadian Rises
    • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, John Dean
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Skitt
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, R H Draney
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Liz
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Arcadian Rises
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Mike Barnes
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, izzy
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Skitt
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, izzy
      • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, William
    • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, Gerald Smyth
  • Re: When what you want to say collides with an idiom, TakenEvent
• Las Vegas Boink 13th November, the Omrud
  • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, David Taylor
      • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Skitt
      • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Bob Cunningham
    • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Skitt
      • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, the Omrud
      • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, R H Draney
  • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, Ross Howard
    • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, the Omrud
  • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Las Vegas Boink 13th November, the Omrud
• sentence construction, keithbc
  • Re: sentence construction, Steve
    • Re: sentence construction, Mike Lyle
      • Re: sentence construction, Ross Howard
      • Re: sentence construction, Mike Lyle
  • Re: sentence construction, Chris Waigl
    • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
  • Re: sentence construction, Jim Lawton
    • Re: sentence construction, Donna Richoux
    • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Jim Lawton
      • Re: sentence construction, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: sentence construction, victorkor
      • Re: sentence construction, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Tony Cooper
      • Re: sentence construction, R H Draney
      • Re: sentence construction, R H Draney
      • Re: sentence construction, Default User
      • Re: sentence construction, Tony Cooper
  • Re: sentence construction, John Dean
  • Re: sentence construction, TakenEvent
    • Re: sentence construction, keithbc
      • Re: sentence construction, Chris Waigl
  • Re: sentence construction, Bill Bonde ('by a commodius vicus of recirculation')
• Re: subordinate clauses, Djurdja
  • Re: subordinate clauses, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: subordinate clauses, Charles Riggs
      • Re: subordinate clauses, Richard Bollard
      • Re: subordinate clauses, Charles Riggs
      • Re: subordinate clauses, Evan Kirshenbaum
• A learner's question, dayzman
  • Re: A learner's question, Troy Steadman
  • Re: A learner's question, Mark Brader
• glad you could make it, sdman2000
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • glad you could make it, sdman2000
    • Re: glad you could make it, Donna Richoux
    • Re: glad you could make it, Troy Steadman
• pop a squade, sdman2000
  • Re: pop a squade, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Re: pop a squade, Tony Cooper
      • Re: pop a squade, TakenEvent
      • Re: pop a squade, Tony Cooper
      • Re: pop a squade, TakenEvent
      • Re: pop a squade, Tony Cooper
      • Re: pop a squade, TakenEvent
      • Re: pop a squade, Will
      • Re: pop a squade, R H Draney
  • Re: pop a squade, nancy13g
• Re: reasoning, Don Phillipson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: reasoning, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: reasoning, Mike Lyle
  • Re: reasoning, Ted Schuerzinger
• Re: BITCH MIMI KAHN...???, Charles Riggs
• Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Jim Lawton
  • Re: Burlack or Boatmen? [UTF-8, was ISO-8859-1, was koi8-r], Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Burlack or Boatmen? [UTF-8, was ISO-8859-1, was koi8-r], Jim Lawton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Wayne Brown
    • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Wood Avens
      • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Wayne Brown
  • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Burlack or Boatmen?, Mikhail Medved
• Ricochet, PR
  • Re: Ricochet, Jim Lawton
• What does "the day will come" means?, Fire Rose
  • Re: What does "the day will come" means?, ray o'hara
  • Re: What does "the day will come" means?, Lars Eighner
  • Re: What does "the day will come" means?, Jim Lawton
• Re: Refute as reject, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: Refute as reject, Nate Branscom
  • Re: Refute as reject, Evan Kirshenbaum
  • Re: Refute as reject, Jeffrey Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Refute as reject, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
      • Re: Refute as reject, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
      • Re: Refute as reject, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Refute as reject, Fred
      • Re: Refute as reject, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
      • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
      • Re: Refute as reject, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
  • Re: Refute as reject, The Other Fran
  • Re: Refute as reject, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Refute as reject, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Refute as reject, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Refute as reject, Richard Bollard
• You piece of, irwell
  • Re: You piece of, Pat Durkin
• Re: Move over, Ella, R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Move over, Ella, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: Move over, Ella, Robert Lieblich
  • Re: Move over, Ella, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Move over, Ella, John Holmes
    • Re: Move over, Ella, Pat Durkin
  • Re: Move over, Ella, Django Cat
    • Re: Move over, Ella, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Move over, Ella, Steve Hayes
  • Re: Move over, Ella, Chris Waigl
    • Re: Move over, Ella, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Move over, Ella, Chris Waigl
      • Re: Move over, Ella, Robert Lieblich
    • Re: Move over, Ella, Mark Brader
      • Re: Move over, Ella, CDB
• Plain clothed?, Bob G
  • Re: Plain clothed?, Skitt
  • Re: Plain clothed?, Jim Lawton
• Re: Use Of Commas In A Series Containing "Or" and "And", Prai Jei
  • Re: Use Of Commas In A Series Containing "Or" and "And", Mike Lyle
    • Re: Use Of Commas In A Series Containing "Or" and "And", R H Draney
      • Re: Use Of Commas In A Series Containing "Or" and "And", Charles Riggs
  • Re: Use Of Commas In A Series Containing "Or" and "And", jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
• Head charang, Prai Jei
  • Re: Head charang, Mike Lyle
    • Re: Head charang, sage
      • Re: Head charang, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: Head charang, John Dean
      • Re: Head charang, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Head charang, John Dean
      • Re: Head charang, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: Head charang, Yusuf B Gursey
• Seaside girls, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Seaside girls, Liz
    • Re: Seaside girls, Jim Lawton
      • Re: Seaside girls, Liz
      • Re: Seaside girls, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Seaside girls, Liz
  • Re: Seaside girls, R H Draney
    • Re: Seaside girls, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Seaside girls, Skitt
      • Re: Seaside girls, Charles Riggs
• Re: tree diagrams - Please help me!, R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tree diagrams - Please help me!, Mike Lyle
• the valence of the verb, Djurdja
  • Re: the valence of the verb, Troy Steadman
    • Message not available
      • Re: the valence of the verb, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Re: the valence of the verb, Troy Steadman
    • Message not available
      • Re: the valence of the verb, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: the valence of the verb, Don Aitken
      • Re: the valence of the verb, Mike Lyle
  • Re: the valence of the verb, Alan Jones
    • Re: the valence of the verb, Djurdja
• postmodifiers in a noun phrase, Djurdja
• structure of a noun phrase, Djurdja
  • Re: structure of a noun phrase, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: structure of a noun phrase, CDB
    • Re: structure of a noun phrase, CDB
      • Re: structure of a noun phrase, Djurdja
• DEPENDENCE RELATION?, Djurdja
  • Re: DEPENDENCE RELATION?, Don Phillipson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: DEPENDENCE RELATION?, Richard Bollard
• Re: "splash page", Troy Steadman
  • Re: "splash page", Will
    • Re: "splash page", Evan Kirshenbaum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "splash page", William
    • Re: "splash page", Jim Lawton
• What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Fire Rose
  • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Bob G
    • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Troy Steadman
    • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Skitt
      • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Jim Lawton
  • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Richard Bollard
  • Re: What does "A good heart is better than all the heads in the world" means?, Spehro Pefhany
• Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, Maria Conlon
    • Re: Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, John Dean
      • Re: Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Malapropism, courtesy Tony Benn, John Dean
• established vs. determined, joanne__king
  • Re: established vs. determined, Troy Steadman
    • Re: established vs. determined, Ross Howard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: established vs. determined, Mike Lyle
      • Re: established vs. determined, mUs1Ka
      • Message not available
      • Re: established vs. determined, Charles Riggs
      • Re: established vs. determined, Ross Howard
      • Re: established vs. determined, Charles Riggs
      • Re: established vs. determined, TsuiDF
      • Re: established vs. determined, Mike Lyle
      • Re: established vs. determined, Charles Riggs
  • Re: established vs. determined, Tony Cooper
    • Re: established vs. determined, joanne__king
      • Re: established vs. determined, Skitt
  • Re: established vs. determined, Richard Bollard
• What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Fire Rose
  • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Troy Steadman
  • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Bob G
    • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Ross Howard
      • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Jim Lawton
      • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, nancy13g
    • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, Troy Steadman
      • Re: What does "Things human must be know to be loved; things divine must be loved to be known" means?, R H Draney
• Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Thank you, Dog, Ross Howard
    • Re: Thank you, Dog, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Tony Cooper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Ross Howard
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
    • Re: Thank you, Dog, Charles Riggs
• Re: Crack the code, Lanarcam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Crack the code, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Crack the code, John Dean
• When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, cyberdude
  • Message not available
    • Re: When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, cyberdude
      • Re: When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, John Seal
      • Re: When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, cyberdude
      • Message not available
      • Re: When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, cyberdude
      • Re: When to use "verb+infinitive to" and "verb+gerund"?, Mark Browne
• Re: Winston Churchill and a single sheet of paper, Arfur Million
  • Message not available
    • Re: Winston Churchill and a single sheet of paper, Mike Lyle
      • Re: Winston Churchill and a single sheet of paper, CDB
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Winston Churchill and a single sheet of paper, John Dean
• Help Me - STS, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Help Me - STS, Troy Steadman
    • Message not available
      • Re: Help Me - STS, Troy Steadman
      • Re: Help Me - STS, Troy Steadman
• Punctuation inside quotes, Usenet user
  • Re: Punctuation inside quotes, the Omrud
• do you know 'dexis'?, What K
  • Re: do you know 'dexis'?, Will
• Re: bury is not berry, or is it., sage
• More Political Cliches, The Other Fran
  • Re: More Political Cliches, John Dean
    • Re: More Political Cliches, Bob G
    • Re: More Political Cliches, Sara Lorimer
    • Message not available
      • Re: More Political Cliches, John Dean
    • Re: More Political Cliches, The Other Fran
      • Re: More Political Cliches, Richard Bollard
      • Re: More Political Cliches, The Other Fran
    • Message not available
      • Re: More Political Cliches, The Other Fran
    • Re: More Political Cliches, Charles Riggs
• Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, R H Draney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, Xah Lee
    • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, Robin Bignall
    • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, Peter Duncanson
    • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, CDB
      • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, Robin Bignall
      • Re: lyrics appreciation: Daisy Bell, CDB
• Re: CBXC - PetsMobility to Launch Cellular Phone for Pets, de781
  • Message not available
    • Re: CBXC - PetsMobility to Launch Cellular Phone for Pets, de781
      • Re: CBXC - PetsMobility to Launch Cellular Phone for Pets, CDB
• what this mean, linq936
  • Re: what this mean, Bob
  • Re: what this mean, Skitt
  • Re: what this mean, The Other Fran
    • Re: what this mean, Bob
      • Re: what this mean, Weatherlawyer
    • Re: what this mean, John O'Flaherty
• "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
  • Re: "www" revisited, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: "www" revisited, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Lyle
      • Re: "www" revisited, PR
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Lyle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Fred
      • Re: "www" revisited, Jeffrey Turner
    • Message not available
      • Re: "www" revisited, The aue webmaster
      • Re: "www" revisited, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: "www" revisited, The aue webmaster
      • Re: "www" revisited, Evan Kirshenbaum
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "www" revisited, William
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Alec McKenzie
      • Re: "www" revisited, the Omrud
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Skitt
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "www" revisited, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Skitt
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Skitt
      • Re: "www" revisited, Skitt
      • Re: "www" revisited, William
      • Re: "www" revisited, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: "www" revisited, Donna Richoux
      • Re: "www" revisited, the Omrud
      • Re: "www" revisited, the Omrud
      • Re: "www" revisited, Bob Cunningham
      • Re: "www" revisited, William
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: "www" revisited, Mike Barnes
• Luton, Sara Lorimer
  • Re: Luton, Harvey Van Sickle
    • Re: Luton, Sara Lorimer
      • Re: Luton, Mike Page
      • Re: Luton, Ross Howard
      • Re: Luton, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Luton, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: Luton, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: Luton, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Luton, Ross Howard
      • Re: Luton, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Luton, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Luton, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Luton, Frances Kemmish
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Luton, CDB
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Luton, CDB
      • Message not available
      • Re: Luton, Philip Eden
      • Re: Luton, John Dean
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Luton, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Luton, the Omrud
      • Re: Luton, Frances Kemmish
      • Re: Luton, the Omrud
      • Re: Luton, Mike Barnes
      • Re: Luton, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Luton, the Omrud
      • Re: Luton, Ross Howard
      • Re: Luton, Tony Cooper
      • Re: Luton, the Omrud
  • Re: Luton, Django Cat
    • Re: Luton, Skitt
      • Re: Luton, Django Cat
      • Re: Luton, Laura F. Spira
  • Re: Luton, Philip Eden
    • Re: Luton, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Luton, Graeme Thomas
    • Re: Luton, the Omrud
    • Re: Luton, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Luton, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Luton, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Luton, Philip Eden
• Correct use of "with", dayzman
  • Re: Correct use of "with", John Lawler
    • Re: Correct use of "with", Robert Lieblich
      • "Someone" vs "Somebody (was: Correct use of "with"), FB
      • Re: "Someone" vs "Somebody (was: Correct use of "with"), Robert Lieblich
      • Re: "Someone" vs "Somebody (was: Correct use of "with"), Charles Riggs
• Re: For This/These Reason(s) vs Thus, Therefore, Etc., rtnda@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: For This/These Reason(s) vs Thus, Therefore, Etc., axel
    • Re: For This/These Reason(s) vs Thus, Therefore, Etc., Mike Lyle
      • Message not available
      • Re: For This/These Reason(s) vs Thus, Therefore, Etc., Peter Duncanson
• Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, ray o'hara
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, R H Draney
    • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Skitt
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, R H Draney
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Skitt
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Mike Lyle
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Skitt
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Skitt
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, TakenEvent
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, No Spam
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Skitt
    • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Tony Cooper
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dean
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Brian Wickham
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dean
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dean
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, the Omrud
      • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dean
      • Message not available
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dawkins
  • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Sara Lorimer
    • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, TakenEvent
      • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, John Dean
  • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What was "The Song about the Knife"?, Troy Steadman
• Re: AUE Lite, Father Ignatius
  • Re: AUE Lite, Tony Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AUE Lite, de781
    • Re: AUE Lite, Mark Browne
  • Re: AUE Lite, Mike Lyle
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: AUE Lite, Ross Howard
    • Message not available
      • Re: AUE Lite, John Dean
      • Re: AUE Lite, Laura F. Spira
      • Re: AUE Lite, John Dean
    • Message not available
      • Re: AUE Lite, Spehro Pefhany
    • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
      • Re: AUE Lite, Mike Lyle
      • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
  • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
    • Re: AUE Lite, Salvatore Volatile
      • Re: AUE Lite, Charles Riggs
• _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, Father Ignatius
  • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, rtnda@xxxxxxx
    • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, Father Ignatius
    • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, R H Draney
      • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, Mike Lyle
  • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, Ross Howard
    • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, Father Ignatius
      • Re: _Obsession_, "Obsession" or Obsession?, CDB
• Who Said What ?, muza
  • Re: Who Said What ?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Who Said What ?, muza
      • Re: Who Said What ?, Donna Richoux
  • Re: Who Said What ?, Mark Brader
    • Re: Who Said What ?, Mark Brader
    • Re: Who Said What ?, Donna Richoux
    • Re: Who Said What ?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Who Said What ?, Sara Lorimer
• By far and away, brians@xxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: By far and away, Adrian Bailey
• Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., Jim Lawton
  • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., The Other Fran
    • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., Django Cat
      • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., John Dean
      • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., R H Draney
      • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: Aberdeen oysters and pavement pizzas., Mike Lyle
• How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, God
• Hallelujah!, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Hallelujah!, God
• Sheep, astray, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Sheep, astray, God
• Her warfare is accomplished, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Her warfare is accomplished, God
• For unto us a Child is born, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • For unto us a Child is born, God
• For Behold, darkness shall cover the earth, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • For Behold, darkness shall cover the earth, God
• We shall not all sleep; but we shall all be changed in a moment, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • We shall not all sleep; but we shall all be changed in a moment, God
• Why do the nations so furiously rage together?, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Why do the nations so furiously rage together?, God
• O thou that tellest good tidings to Zion, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • O thou that tellest good tidings to Zion, God
• Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Jim Lawton
    • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Prai Jei
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Who is the King of Glory?, God
    • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Robert Lieblich
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Weatherlawyer
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, John Dean
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Donalbain
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Richard R. Hershberger
    • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Earle Jones
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Earle Jones
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Earle Jones
      • Re: Who is the King of Glory?, Charles Riggs
• O death, where is thy sting?, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • O death, where is thy sting?, God
• Behold the Lamb of God, Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Behold the Lamb of God, God
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Behold the Lamb of God, Mike Lyle
• A mystery (from the Messiah), Charles Riggs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A mystery (from the Messiah), God
    • Re: A mystery (from the Messiah), Default User
      • Re: A mystery (from the Messiah), Harvey Van Sickle
      • Re: A mystery (from the Messiah), TsuiDF
      • Re: A mystery (from the Messiah), Skitt
      • Re: A mystery (from the Messiah), R H Draney
• O death, why is thy sting?, Charles Riggs
  • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, Donalbain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • O death, why is thy sting?, God
    • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, ray o'hara
      • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, R H Draney
      • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, K. Edgcombe
      • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, Skitt
      • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, R H Draney
    • Re: O death, why is thy sting?, Robert Lieblich
• Re: Browse your gothic lovers' photos and chat with them online!, de781
  • Re: Browse your gothic lovers' photos and chat with them online!, William
• Errors in Know Your English test, Stewart Gordon
  • Re: Errors in Know Your English test, nancy13g
    • Message not available
      • Re: Errors in Know Your English test, Peter Duncanson
      • Re: Errors in Know Your English test, Stewart Gordon
      • Re: Errors in Know Your English test, Peter Duncanson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I before E except when it isn't [was: Re: Errors in Know Your English test], Bob Cunningham
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I before E except when it isn't, Evan Kirshenbaum
      • Re: I before E except when it isn't, Robert Bannister
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I before E except when it isn't [was: Re: Errors in Know Your English test], Salvatore Volatile
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • phonetic vs phonemic notation [was: Re: I before E except when it isn't [was: Re: Errors in Know Your English test]], Bob Cunningham
      • Re: phonetic vs ph