Re: "Totally decimated"
- From: "Jared" <bijgh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:29:25 -0700
Jess Askin wrote:
>
> I think people like the sound of "decimated," without worrying too much
> about how its meaning might differ from "devastated" or "destroyed."
I hear it used a lot (in Australia) referring to numbers being greatly
reduced (teams decimated by injuries, share prices decimated, etc), but
decimated as a general replacement for destroyed is new to me. Is it
regional?
.
- References:
- Re: "Totally decimated"
- From: Skitt
- Re: "Totally decimated"
- From: R H Draney
- Re: "Totally decimated"
- From: Jess Askin
- Re: "Totally decimated"
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this phrase grammatically right?
- Next by Date: Re: That's a good question [was: Re: Less & fewer (again)]
- Previous by thread: Re: "Totally decimated"
- Next by thread: Re: "Totally decimated"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|