Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Don Aitken <don-aitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:20:14 +0100
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:55:11 GMT, "Alan" <in_flagrante@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>"Joe Fineman" <joe_f@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:u7jeosl5h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> dayzman@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>> Mike Lyle wrote:
>>>> Troy Steadman wrote:
>>>> > Jess Askin wrote:
>>>> >> <dayzman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:1123996261.099283.225600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Is it grammatically correct to say:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "Not only we beat you, we beat the referee too."
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If so, how is it different to:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> "Not only did we beat you, we beat the referee too."
>>>> >>
[snip]
>Previous posters have answered your question, but I just wanted to make an
>aside: it should be "different from" rather than "different to"
>
No it shouldn't. "That *different* can only be followed by *from* and
not by *to* is a superstition", says Fowler. The OED also rejects the
idea.
--
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Areff
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: mark
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- References:
- "Not only did we beat you"
- From: dayzman
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Jess Askin
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Troy Steadman
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: dayzman
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Joe Fineman
- Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- From: Alan
- "Not only did we beat you"
- Prev by Date: Re: Did Elvis ever lapse into Elizabethan prose?
- Next by Date: Re: Did Elvis ever lapse into Elizabethan prose?
- Previous by thread: Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- Next by thread: Re: "Not only did we beat you"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|