Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- From: cjdaytonjrnospam@xxxxxxx
- Date: 03 Aug 2009 00:44:19 GMT
Ant <ANTant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/2/2009 1:55 PM PT, cjdaytonjrnospam@xxxxxxx typed:
I heard somewhere that OTA HD quality surpasses either cable
or dish. I was wondering if this is true, and what are the facts.
The only rationale I can think of is these paid services perhaps
compress at a higher factor, if this is true.
Please set me straight.
Thanks.
Nothing to set straight. You have it right.
Even MPEG-4 on dish I kept reading?
The mpeg4 local channels on Directv are very good.
Most can't tell the difference. I think the ota
hd version is SLIGHTLY better, but not by much.
Chip
--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- From: Ant
- Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- References:
- OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- From: les
- Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- From: cjdaytonjrnospam
- Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- From: Ant
- OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about amplifier
- Next by Date: Re: Question about amplifier
- Previous by thread: Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- Next by thread: Re: OTA quality vs cable vs dish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|