Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- From: "Leonard Caillouet" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:49:20 -0400
"UCLAN" <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:H69Ml.22555$i24.11911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The subject line is misleading. The debate regarding the two technologies will remain.
As I've explained in the past, the "SUBJECT" line is merely the title
of the article at that URL.
You can explain all you want, but it does not change the fact that it is misleading, nor make your posts more useful. You are the one posting and you should take responsibility for an appropriate title and for qualifying the information.
Leonard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- From: UCLAN
- Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- From: Leonard Caillouet
- Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- From: UCLAN
- Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- Prev by Date: Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- Next by Date: Re: ABC O&O stations running two 720p sub-channels
- Previous by thread: Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- Next by thread: Re: Samsung Series 9 LCD TV, solves the LCD vs plasma argument
- Index(es):