Re: 16:10?
- From: "Richard C." <post-age@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:34:02 -0700
"Bruce." <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Mv0ri.53582$5j1.828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================
I agree. I have no doubt that at some point in the future, they'll change the ratio again, just to sell more sets.
Bruce.
Not likely.........
16:9 is the almost perfect choice for the showing of the major ratios.
1.85:1 almost fills the screen.
1.33:1 uses almost 75% of the screen
2.35:1 uses almost 75% of the screen.
The next major move is to 2.35:1 screen with masking
and a FP system with anamorphic lense....
but that is likely way beyond you.....................
.
- References:
- 16:10?
- From: Bruce.
- Re: 16:10?
- From: Chuck McDevitt
- Re: 16:10?
- From: dicko
- Re: 16:10?
- From: Bruce.
- Re: 16:10?
- From: Bruce.
- 16:10?
- Prev by Date: Re: 16:10?
- Next by Date: Re: Will there be "portable" ASTC TVs by 2009 to fill the void left by non-functioning NTSC receivers?
- Previous by thread: Re: 16:10?
- Next by thread: Re: 16:10?
- Index(es):