Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- From: dm@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave)
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:07:34 GMT
In article <QdKdnehQX_NltaDbnZ2dnUVZ_sOknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Art" <plotsligt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The class action requires at least two lamp replacments and the fact that
the lamps appear to have burst internally. Contacting Panasonuc Customer
Care with the sale date, model and serial number will eliminate any guess.
Hmmm, my reading of the settlement (I have one of these sets, though
no failures at 4500+hrs), indicates it quite clearly applies to asl
low as 1 failure. There is an alternative "multiple failures"
remedy which gives you the option of $1000 off a new TV or a
replacement TV. That one requires 3 failures. Nothing specifically
about 2 failures anywhere.
Also see the discussion at:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=427888&page=8&pp=50
It does appear to be for lamps, not ballasts. So he may be out of
luck. But I agree he should pursue as you suggested.
.
- References:
- Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- From: Dave
- Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- From: Art
- Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- Prev by Date: Re: new tv and same look
- Next by Date: Re: new tv and same look
- Previous by thread: Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- Next by thread: Re: panasonic pt-50lc13 problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|