Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- From: "Captain Midnight" <Notany@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:11:03 -0400
<jim.e.dimoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:530q235sap16cqjn7hratq142u623udrbe@xxxxxxxxxx
I'd like to get this clear also.2
I have 2 "old" sets and one new. None HD.
None mention "QAM" but all have switches to allow receiving
unscrambled cable channels (2-76). I therefore assume QAM is
specifically HD - maybe not.
Looking at new HDTV some mention QAM, some only ATSC & NTSC.
My question - what determines if a set will receive the 2-76 cable
channels, or is it assumed that all new sets do via the std NTSC tuner
and a switch? -- AND the same assumption holds for the ATSC tuner in
receiving cable channels that somewhere there is a switch?
thx
On 16 Apr 2007 13:59:47 GMT, rlewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Cass Lewart)
wrote:
From my engineering days I remember that QAM stands for Quadrature
Amplitude Modulation, a method to squeeze more bits per second into a
limited bandwidth transmission line. ATSC is a standard used for HD over
the air transmission. Some people refer to QAM tuners and ATSC tuners as
correct?different items, some use the terms for the same tuner. Which is
If these are 2 different items what are the inputs and outputs?
Cass
http://www.hdtvprimer.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- From: jim . e . dimoni
- Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- References:
- QAM v. ATSC tuners
- From: Cass Lewart
- Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- From: jim . e . dimoni
- QAM v. ATSC tuners
- Prev by Date: Re: Recording HD Signals
- Next by Date: Re: All about Europe's HDTV over-the-air broadcasting!!
- Previous by thread: Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- Next by thread: Re: QAM v. ATSC tuners
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|