Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: "Matthew L. Martin" <nothere@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:23:30 -0400
Sam Spade wrote:
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:In article <127lrdsft9ev7d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Dan Luke" <c172rg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This was probably the first time I ever decided not to watch a program because it wasn't HD. I was mostly looking forward to seeing the spectacle of Indy on a 50" HD screen--I'm not a big racing fan.
More proof that idiots will watch anything, things they would never otherwise watch, purely because it's in HD.
Stare at the pixels, people. If that's your form of entertainment, more power to you. But try to keep the drool off the $5000 screen.
That is simplistic.
Don't be too hard on him. It's the very best he can do.
Matthew
--
I'm a contractor. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?
.
- References:
- Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: Dan Luke
- Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: eHDMI
- Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: G-squared
- Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: Dan Luke
- Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- From: Sam Spade
- Indy 500; no HDTV
- Prev by Date: Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- Next by Date: Re: What's the best 42" Plasma
- Previous by thread: Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- Next by thread: Re: Indy 500; no HDTV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
