Re: ED/HD again
- From: "Richard Harison" <noway@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:24:13 -0400
Hmmm...
You said
*And, in my opinion, digital SD looks better on an ED set than on an HD
set.*
I wasn't aware that people made ED sets as opposed to true HD sets. I was
asking for an example. Better?
--
All the Best
Richard Harison
"justsc" <scowart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1147445502.570474.281860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Harison wrote:
So some names/models of ED sets say in the 30-42 inch range? ThanksRichard,
--
All the Best
Richard Harison
"rz" <rz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1266js4td4enedf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"justsc" <scowart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1147285125.917089.154160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And, in my opinion, digital SD looks better on an ED set than on an HD
set.
While generally true, This depends on the set.
I don't think I understand your question. Could you elaborate a little?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: justsc
- Re: ED/HD again
- References:
- ED/HD again
- From: Sam K.
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: justsc
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: justsc
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: rz
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: Richard Harison
- Re: ED/HD again
- From: justsc
- ED/HD again
- Prev by Date: Re: HDTV has no "Analog Audio Output"
- Next by Date: Re: HDTV UK
- Previous by thread: Re: ED/HD again
- Next by thread: Re: ED/HD again
- Index(es):