Re: Is HDTV really user friendly?

X-No-archive: yes

<me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fpls52li36ajj7qa1egi31hmfenn2vh9rf@xxxxxxxxxx
Bottom line.... will off the air HD TV reception be as
easy as SD has been?

SD hasn't always been the best quality... but the eye
is way more tolerant to "noise" in a signal than the
ear is

Is HD gonna be a lot of trouble with al the damn
pixelation and all?

Just curious
===========================
I have been watching it for 4 years now.
It works.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: From first principles
    ... in your mind's eye. ... |> Noise whether it be white, pink or red is just undecoded data so yes as ... It is real information. ... | what ever yarn you are spinning but the Kens are ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: 20D ?? 5D
    ... No, it isn't, but noise is roughly equivalent at ... >>> high ISOs, the 5D has an advantage at lower ISO. ... I therefore find it unlikely that picture quality is better unless ... >> So the better result is due to the lens. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: 20D ?? 5D
    ... >>> Smallest individual dot resolution, noise level, colour accuracy are the ... >>> noise reduction tech the noise level is even lower. ... You said you found it unlikely that the image quality would be better in the ... >>> middle part of the lens is the best part and that is the only part a 20D ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: From first principles
    ... [snip noise generating aspiring wrap-music news reader] ... in your mind's eye. ... > analogue and digital process. ... but single electron detection is clearly visible i ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: pixels
    ... >> same if the quality is what it should be.. ... >> I still use a Canon A40 that is 1600x1200 pixels, ... >> The only benefit of having more pixels is that you can crop the picture ... >> the signal and noise. ...
    (alt.photography)