Re: DirecTV ???
- From: akjack@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:56:50 GMT
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:30:21 GMT, "Gerry Wheeler"
<gxwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"sky" <sky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns97B55741FF718sky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Went to pick up a new direct tv receiver at best Buy for HD . they said I
had to lease it. This is a joke right?
No. I'm not a Direct TV subscriber, but from what I've heard they went to a
lease-only arrangement earlier this year.
For satellite receiver technology that becomes obsolete in 5 years
or less, the lease deal is better than a purchase. I have two working
DirecTV receivers stored in the garage, that served me well for less
than 3 years each. Had these been leased, I would have been provided
with newer units when local channel assignments were changed
from 8xx to 2 digit channel numbers.
HD capable satellite receivers are going to be feature updated
several times in the next 5 years.
.
- References:
- Dirct tv???
- From: sky
- Re: Dirct tv???
- From: Gerry Wheeler
- Dirct tv???
- Prev by Date: Re: Dirct tv???
- Previous by thread: Re: Dirct tv???
- Next by thread: Re: Dirct tv???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|