Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Bruce Tomlin <bruce#fanboy.net@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:28:37 -0600
In article <xfednWG2fv6tabzZnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"R Sweeney" <DockScience@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2400 baud was nowhere near the bandwidth limit of twisted pair phone lines,
it was merely the limit of primitive but simple frequency shift and phase
shift signalling used at the time to avoid the issues of poor phone line
quality by simple brute force of staying away from the edges.
In fact, by the proper definition of baud, they never did go much faster
than 2400 baud. They just found ways to send more bits per baud.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Thumper
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- References:
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Alan
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: R Sweeney
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Prev by Date: Re: Sears question
- Next by Date: Re: Question on picture size
- Previous by thread: Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Next by thread: Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Index(es):