Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan)
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:10:17 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ANWTf.8355$sL2.6822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Bob Miller <robmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The Internet age has hardly dawned yet as per video/TV. Wireless
broadband which will be Gigabit bandwidth is not even on the radar
screens of most yet and it will be the major component of last mile.
Huh? If you mean over the air, as in radio/televison, I think the
gigabit capability is going to be a hard thing to do.
Little problem called the Shannon Capacity of a channel. To get a
gigabit over a real channel, one will need quite a bit of bandwidth
(as in hundreds of megahertz in a real system).
Now, if you deliver this by fiber optics, you could perhaps claim
it is wireless, but it is not wireless in the sense most people think
of it.
Wireless broadcasting like the IPTV that Qualcomm and Crown Castle will
introduce this year to cell phones will be ubiquitous at much higher
bandwidth in a few years and not limited to cell phones.
The Shannon Capacity of channels won't change.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon_capacity for more discussion.
Alan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Matthew Vaughan
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: R Sweeney
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Bob Miller
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- References:
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Prev by Date: Re: 1080i on a 1280x720 naitive resolution HDTV?
- Next by Date: Re: 1080i on a 1280x720 native resolution HDTV?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Next by thread: Re: Why OTA HD will go away
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|