Re: native 16:9 programming
- From: "tooloud" <nospam.jake@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:02:53 GMT
Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dave Gower wrote:
I definitely disagree with Wes, I think since we (or at least I,That's why Hollywood transitioned to the wide screen circa 1950s-60s.
don't know about him) live on a horizontal surface, wide-screen is
the natural way to take in the world. 4:3 is like looking through a
window, 16:9 is much more like being out there.
I don't know if I'd go that far. My understanding is that Hollywood moved to
widescreen to offer something people couldn't get on their TV at home so as
to keep people coming to the theater.
--
tooloud
Remove nothing to reply
.
- References:
- native 16:9 programming
- From: Terence
- Re: native 16:9 programming
- From: Dave Gower
- Re: native 16:9 programming
- From: Tim
- native 16:9 programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Showing jpg images on HDTV monitor; really fuzzy.
- Next by Date: Re: Samsung 56" 1080p dlp vs Sony sxrd 50"
- Previous by thread: Re: native 16:9 programming
- Next by thread: Re: native 16:9 programming
- Index(es):