Re: AKAI TVs
- From: "Art" <arthurgernberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:41:42 -0400
Service the crap on a daily basis! At least LG is not grouped in there for a
real POS
"ZVR" <nospamever@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kOCdnVj1KtjPTo7eRVn-rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You must be dreaming or have not followed the state of technology for the
> last couple of years putting Samsung and Funai side-by-side like that.
>
>
>
> "Art" <arthurgernberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:2J-dnUMvwpHyPo7eRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Probable Samsung or Funai orgin.
>> "Tam/WB2TT" <t-tammaru@c0mca$t.net> wrote in message
>> news:G_adnYNYTt9SsY7eRVn-ig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> <ALMINS1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:5937-4312DACC-794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Forgot to ask in my previous post.
>>>>
>>>> Any opinions or owner experience with Akai tvs as to quality in general
>>>> and especialy the CT3216 model at Walmart?
>>>> Couldn't find anything of meaning on the web.
>>>>
>>>> AL WA8AGU
>>>>
>>> No info on the 3216, but the Akai 4216 has the worst customer rating of
>>> any flat panel TV at the Circuit City web site, 2.4 out of 5.
>>>
>>> Tam
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- AKAI TVs
- From: ALMINS1
- Re: AKAI TVs
- From: Tam/WB2TT
- Re: AKAI TVs
- From: Art
- Re: AKAI TVs
- From: ZVR
- AKAI TVs
- Prev by Date: Re: Why 1080i?
- Next by Date: Re: Best Buy Experience
- Previous by thread: Re: AKAI TVs
- Next by thread: Used RPTV - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):