Re: Why 1080i?
- From: "Leonard Caillouet" <no@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:18:51 -0400
<phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:de57cf06q2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:59:55 -0400 Jeff Rife <wevsr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> | Teear (BigFat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> |> >You tell me the exact model of a _consumer_ HDTV that can show the
> full
> |> >1920x1080 (not something running 720 and downconverts 1080) at a price
> |> >under $600 (the price one can get a PC monitor to do the same thing).
> |> >Any screen size you want.
> |>
> |> http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=2601425
> |
> | That set can't show 1920x1080 at full resolution...even their spec of
> 800
> | lines of horizontal resolution shows that...you need 1080 TVL to be able
> | to display all 1920x1080 pixels. Then, too, it's likely that the spec
> | doesn't refer to the actual picture tube, but rather to the bandwidth of
> | the video section, which is a common way to inflate the spec without
> outright
> | lying.
>
> So what kind of hypocrisy are we getting from Jeff Rife these days?
>
> He calls this "resolution" here, yet it wants to be critical of others
> for using that same term for the same purpose:
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:31:49 -0400 Jeff Rife <wevsr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> | (phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> | > I'm not referring to resolutions in p/i^2, but absolute resolution.
> | >
> | > The remainder of your wasted post is not included since it is based on
> | > your misunderstanding.
> |
> | Since you don't seem to know what "resolution" means, I think we see why
> I
> | have a "misundertanding". Use terms correctly and people will be less
> likely
> | to think you are as ignorant as you are. Persist in using them
> incorrectly
> | even after the correct use is pointed out to you, and then people will
> rightly
> | think that ignorance isn't the problem...stupidity is.
>
> So when will Matthew L. Martin chime in here against Jeff Rife for using
> the wrong term, just as he did before:
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:38:52 -0400 Matthew L. Martin
> <nothere@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> | phil-news-nospam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> |
> | >
> | > I'm not referring to resolutions in p/i^2, but absolute resolution.
> | >
> |
> | Absolute resolution?
> |
> | I think we have kooksign here. It looks like we have another poster with
> | his own private dictionary.
> |
> | I think you mean to say: geometry.
> |
> | Resolution is measured along a line or over an area. You know: DPI (dots
> | per inch) PPI (pixels per inch) LPOI (line pairs per inch), arc-seconds
> | of resolving power, circle of confusion ...
> |
> | Geometry is independent of area: 1280x720 pixels, 1920x1080 pixels etc.
>
> FYI to BOTH Jeff and Matt ... most technical specifications for monitors
> and video displays really do use the term "resolution" to specify how
> many lines of detail the display can >>RESOL<<ve.
>
> Maybe you guys should search AVS Forum to see that it is a standard usage.
> Here, I'll even give you a head start: http://tinyurl.com/dnz3h
The term gets misused all the time. If you would read for the context of
what they are saying, they actually do understand the concepts of resolution
and geometry.
I thought you were going to stop responding...
While I have given both of them their ration of criticism for going off the
deep end with discussions such as these, it is clear that they have been
mostly right and you have been obstinate and argumentative. I would have
discussed the topics in a less vitriolic manner and not tolerated so much of
any of this childish bickering and name calling, but they have been more
right and you more wrong in most of this thread. You need to step back,
relax and let it go.
Leonard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Why 1080i?
- References:
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: Charles Rabinowitz
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: r
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: Matthew L. Martin
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: Jeff Rife
- Re: Why 1080i?
- From: phil-news-nospam
- Re: Why 1080i?
- Prev by Date: 3D TV - would Interlaced or Progressive be better
- Next by Date: bright spot on plasma screen
- Previous by thread: Re: Why 1080i?
- Next by thread: Re: Why 1080i?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading