Re: Mike's Decision

FirstHit writes:

f> I thought it was a bad move on Mike's part.

f> Actually, if I were Mike, I would have considered letting myself come
f> in second. That way you don't put yourself in the position of
f> choosing who gets the reward.
[...]

Yes, but this wasn't the type of competition where Mike could
have safely controlled his placement. If Mike had let someone else win,
he could have easily been stuck in a position where he couldn't afford
to miss a tile. (Of course, it turned out that Steve was pathetic and
that strategy would have been less risky than it seemed.)

--

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mikes Decision
    ... f> Actually, if I were Mike, I would have considered letting myself come ... that strategy would have been less risky than it seemed.) ... I think in most contests controlling placement would have been a lot ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • Re: Mikes Decision
    ... Actually, if I were Mike, I would have considered letting myself come ... choosing who gets the reward. ... choice can be a lose/lose situation. ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • [PWI 500] The List is Here
    ... 25 Chris Jericho ... 190 Mike Shane ... 195 Steve Lewington ... 202 Kevin Northcutt ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)
  • Re: Information contained in message headers.
    ... An example is when Steve claimed that I had stated that the Rover 75 was superior to the Merc 'C' Class. ... What I am trying to get across is that there is often more than a single truth in a sentence taken out of context - and it is very easy to bring something like this up constantly and regularly and accuse someone of being a liar. ... Mike is trying to make light of the 'spoofing' of my posts by Steve as though it was obvious that the posts were not from me. ...
    (uk.legal)