Re: Well Played Parvati

On Apr 24, 4:59 pm, "madamS" <mad...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


That's not necessarily true, as Lill won the last challenge and chose to
bring Sandra with her instead of Johnny Fairplay. We really have no idea
what would have happened .

Because Sandra early on threw her vote out to ensure Rupert was
eliminated, he wasn't around to contend with at F-2.

I can't think of any other reason that they made her a villian, though
she did throw out the fish Rupert caught saying it was to punish the
tribe for voting Rupert out. If she really wanted to give Rupert a
chance, why didn't she stick with him and tie the vote up?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Well Played Parvati
    ... If she'd voted with her alliance, ... would have tied and Rupert may have had a shot. ... woman) Rupert would have won more jury votes than Sandra. ... Another thing Sandra apparently did was warn Candice about ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • Re: Jeff Probst blogs the finale of Survivor: Heroes vs Villains
    ... Again going back to the Dalton interview, the way Sandra described the final ... Parv because of the way he complimented her game play. ... Rupert certainly did. ... to vote for Danielle. ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • Re: Well Played Parvati
    ... What exactly did Sandra do to show she is a great player? ... If she'd voted with her alliance, ... would have tied and Rupert may have had a shot. ... remaining players. ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • Re: Well Played Parvati
    ... What exactly did Sandra do to show she is a great player? ... If she'd voted with her alliance, ... would have tied and Rupert may have had a shot. ... bring Sandra with her instead of Johnny Fairplay. ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)
  • Re: Well Played Parvati
    ... What exactly did Sandra do to show she is a great player? ... doublecross on her alliance partner, Rupert, by throwing away her vote ... If she'd voted with her alliance, ... would have tied and Rupert may have had a shot. ...
    (alt.tv.survivor)