Re: Did Sugar gain some respect?
- From: FirstHit <FirstHit@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:17:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 11, 9:30 pm, thezeppo7628 <thezeppo7...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <ghsj6i$6r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Obveeus" <Obve...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The real opportunity that seems to have been missed by all the players,
though, is that the target should have been Ken. Matty should have wanted
to target Ken since he knew that Ken was targeting him. Bob should have
been targeting Ken because Ken's manipulation attempts this week were really
pathetic and Bob should have been able to see that Ken was targeting him.
Meanwhile, everyone in the game should have wanted Crystal there as 'the
perfect F2 partner'.
Absolutely right! Ken is a far bigger immunity threat, and a shrewder
schemer, than Crystal. It seemed to me that Sugar, Matty, and Bob
picked Crystal simply because they didn't like her personality, not
for any strategic reasons.
Bob might have felt that by voting out Crystal instead of Ken he was
not going back on his word with Ken. If Ken complains that he was not
given the immunity idol, Bob can now say it was because he knew he
didn't need it.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bob and RC guests
- Next by Date: Re: Did Sugar gain some respect?
- Previous by thread: Re: Did Sugar gain some respect?
- Next by thread: Re: Did Sugar gain some respect?