Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616 <s0183616@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:42:19 GMT
Bigolhomo wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:47:06 -0400, s0183616 <s0183616@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Obveeus wrote:"s0183616" <s0183616@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I agree that the move might have been a good one to try. I'm just saying there is risk involved with trying it and I think that Jason probably would have called Nat out rather than act like he's still her ally.I don't think they could have gotten Jason to vote with them and, if they tried, Nat certainly would have found out and the target may have shifted to them.If all 3 approached him and Amanda made it clear that she heard the women's plan personally, I think they could. Even if the target shifts, any of them are in a good position to beat Parvati in a tie breaker challenge.
So what if there's risk involved?
What motive does Amanda have to take a risk like that? She's being told she's going to last awhile, plus, when it all girls, she'll have a good chance to immunity out.
In addition to that, she might be lucky enough to get the HII.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Ron
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- References:
- Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: madams53
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Obveeus
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: ¤~Îñ©üßu§~¤
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Obveeus
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Bigolhomo
- Spoiler-stupid moves
- Prev by Date: Re: Ok, For the Last Time, Use the DAMN IDOL!!!
- Next by Date: Re: CBS website Video clips for Episode #10
- Previous by thread: Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- Next by thread: Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|