Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Ron <BigELilE05@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 24, 9:48 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ron wrote:
On Apr 24, 9:39 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ron wrote:
On Apr 24, 9:27 pm, s0183616 <s0183...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Maybe. And not nearly for certain. It could backfire on them badly.
¤~Îñ©üßu§~¤ wrote:All they had to say was "Jason, that bitch Nat went through your
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:09:03 -0400, "Obveeus" <Obve...@xxxxxxx>wrote:I don't think they could have gotten Jason to vote with them and, if
"madams53" <madam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wroteI understand they all dislike(d) Jason. Other then not being too
ok we are supposed to see a stupid move. Is it going to get stupider thanParvati is apparently so confident that she has the game permanently in
telling your supposed alliance member-" my final 3 doesn't include you" ?
all-female mode that she has decided to go ahead and start moving forward
with attempting to earn jury votes.
She may have a point. After all, if these guys had any brains at all, they
(and Amanda) should have been aligned tonight to get rid of Parvati.. Amanda
is an idiot to actually believe that Parvati or Cirie has plans to keep her
there for F3. Why was no move (not even a hint of a move beyond James
telling Amada which way he would vote) made against Parvati to break up that
alliance? James/Erik/Amanda were on the short wide of the vote last night
AND Jason was being targetted with a plan to split vote him out. yet, it
seems that Erik and Amanda were convinced that their best plan was to go
along with the crowd and try to look like they are part of the main alliance
again? Meanwhile, James is an even bigger idiot as he tosses out a stray
vote for Parvati knowing that Amanda and Erik won't be. He basically gave
up any value to his vote at a time where his vote may have ended up
mattering.
As for Parvati lobbying for James' vote: her only shot at getting it is if
all the men are on the jury AND Amanda is also there.
bright he seemed like a nice guy that was trying to be honest.
James/Erik/Amanda could have told Jason he was being played. Jason
plays the HII, James/Erik/Amanda/Jason vote for Parv and the power
shifts. James/Erik/Amanda/Jason vote out the other 3 then at F4
James/Erik/Amanda get rid of Jason. It's that simple and they blew it
which means James looks to be next to go now
they tried, Nat certainly would have found out and the target may have
shifted to them.
bag, she's playing you"...now unless he is really stupid, he would
have voted with those 3 to get out whoever they wanted.
It could actually cause Nat to actually align with Jason for real.
If someone went through MY shit, their ass would be GONE!
Unless you become truly convinced they are your best chance at the
million, then the smart player has to live with that.
If Jason ratted Amanda and James out to Nat and Nat decided she had to
align with Jason for real and she was somehow able to truly convince
Jason that she was a _real_ ally, it would have to be something he'd
have to consider.
I probably wouldn't do it if I were him, but I wouldn't discount it
automatically.
She (Nat) lied right to his face! There would be NO reason not to
believe James, Amanda and Erik and to trust Nat.
Then again, those 3 didn't approach him with any kind of plan,
so.............
.
- References:
- Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: madams53
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Obveeus
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: ¤~Îñ©üßu§~¤
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Ron
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: Ron
- Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- From: s0183616
- Spoiler-stupid moves
- Prev by Date: Ok, For the Last Time, Use the DAMN IDOL!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- Previous by thread: Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- Next by thread: Re: Spoiler-stupid moves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|