Re: Rupert?
- From: "Franklin Cross" <CrossBaby111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:52:06 -0400
"PJ Wilson" <pwilnospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8Gc5f.4243$%43.2997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Obveeus said...
>>
>>I think what PJ is saying is that when Rupert cannot form an articulate
>>thought (instead letting out a loud growl of frustration), stands over
>>someone to physically intimidate them, or pouts like a 3 year old: he is
>>reminds the rest of us that we all have our pathetic moments when we
>>revert
>>to childish antics.
>>
>>At least, I think that is what PJ was implying. I'm trying to give him
>>the
>>benefit of the doubt even though he seems as trollish as that Roderick
>>guy.
>
> The branding of someone who holds opposing opinions as a 'troll' is
> the last refuge of a truly lame debater.
>
He does it as soon as he starts to lose one of the thousands of arguments he
starts. And the sad part is he usually starts them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rupert?
- From: PJ Wilson
- Re: Rupert?
- References:
- Rupert?
- From: Obveeus
- Re: Rupert?
- From: PJ Wilson
- Re: Rupert?
- From: Bigolhomo
- Re: Rupert?
- From: PJ Wilson
- Re: Rupert?
- From: PJ Wilson
- Re: Rupert?
- From: Elle
- Re: Rupert?
- From: PJ Wilson
- Rupert?
- Prev by Date: Re: I like Judd
- Next by Date: Re: Rupert?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rupert?
- Next by thread: Re: Rupert?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|