Re: A question on religion

On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:22:03 -0500, rwalker wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:09:38 -0500, "bella" <tinydancer@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Exactly. If it's not in Leviticus or Deuteronomy it's blasphemy.



Which is ironic since Jesus said let he who is without sin cast the
first stone.

And there was the whole "turn the other cheek" thing, too.

--
If there's a nuclear winter, at least it'll snow.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Honest question about church attitude to gay relationships
    ... without sin cast the first stone", ... A comment that was used to defuse a particular situation. ... Jesus' statement about confirming the law, not destroying it, I ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Yeah, Im back.
    ... "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." ... >I didn't claim innocence, I do claim that you are as guilty as I am. ... Interesting thing, Jesus did not cast the first stone either, so by ... Jesus' own action, ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Proof Rightwing "christians" Are Fake
    ... > needle than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God." ... > 3.May the person who is without sin cast the first stone. ... Please don't confuse the "religious right" by using the words of Jesus. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: A question on religion
    ... Which is ironic since Jesus said let he who is without sin cast the ... first stone. ... and jesus also loved mary magdalene. ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Does Richard H Jacobson Any Longer Know What He Is Posting?
    ... >> Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. ... >> Judge not lest you be judged. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)