Re: CNN last night: Amanda Knox

On Dec 8, 3:46 pm, johns <johns...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If Larry King was trying to make me mad, it worked. Seems
like the Spagetti-Eaters conducted nothing less than a case
of character assassination against her, and convicted her
without evidence or motive ... just a display of arrogance
and ignorance .. and one of their typical horror movies
scenes out of the 60s. Reminds me of exactly what has
happened to Casey Anthony. No proof .. no evidence ...
just a political circus. Neither of those young women has
or will receive a fair trial.

It is almost like we need a totally separate investigative
source that is not legally or morally connected to LE
or any nationality .. willing to conduct an "intelligent"
look into the issues, and set aside what is motivating
the prosecution. In a way, I suppose the News Media
is suppose to do that, but then they are powerless
beyond putting the "truth" out there.

It is a good thing I'm not President of the USA. I would
simply walk up to the parties involved and break
somebodys jaw.


I had the belief that Amanda was innocent and I followed the trial.
The things that I expected her attorney to do -if she was innocent-
were things her attorney never did.

Now, I think I was inclined towartds innnocence becaseu of bias in the
US media (and of course, because I, like johns, am a sucker for a
pretty face.)

I am not totally convinced of her guilt now, but there sure is a lot
of evidence taht she was guilty. If she was not guilty, then her
extremely expensive lawyer just didn't dop his job. I think he did
the best he could, though, with the evidence at hand.

Mick



.

Relevant Pages