Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- From: mcl2@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 17, 6:08 pm, "Smokie Darling (Annie)" <Barnabus1...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Granted, by them releasing this sort of statement, it would rather
muddy waters on the "tainted jury pool" thing, eh?
Not really.
Defense attorney defending what is left of his client's public
reputation. Honorable activity. On his part. Says nothing about his
client.
A way different thing than LE making statements designed to creat am
pressioin of guilt of a presumed innocent. Wasting our tax money,
lessening the possibility of a fair trial. Pretty much inappropriate,
in my book.
Mick
Mick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- From: Smokie Darling (Annie)
- Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- References:
- OK. You guys owe me a donut
- From: johns
- Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- From: Smokie Darling (Annie)
- OK. You guys owe me a donut
- Prev by Date: Re: Casey - Duct Tape - Fingerprints
- Next by Date: Re: NM--Albuquerque's West Mesa 92-acre crime scene
- Previous by thread: Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- Next by thread: Re: OK. You guys owe me a donut
- Index(es):