Re: Web Pages of Death Row Inmates


"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Gq6dnaxrX-nVnBnVnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"tiny dancer" <tinydancer357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xcTgk.4506$P8.1492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n8OdnXpJiePaaB7VnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"tiny dancer" <tinydancer357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OlSgk.4530$9V5.2583@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:h7idnZYnws9wRR7VnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"tiny dancer" <tinydancer357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EoQgk.4483$w93.1504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v7SdnbB2MNSgVR7VnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"tiny dancer" <tinydancer357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WjIgk.4351$US3.3493@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Messalina" <destruction.eva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11074df2-c060-4db7-b4a8-33b5f7a977e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 19, 1:32 am, "Bo Raxo" <crimenewscen...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ladies, your lonely days are over. Where life is but a dream:

http://ccadp.org/inmates.htm

Not that it will matter to the more bloodthirsty around here, but
if you're
going to kill someone, at least take a look at a photo and see the
person.

Bo Raxo

Are you serious? For whatever demented reason, I am a committed
student of this topic. I know a few things. Your pal Charles Eng,
for instance, murdered babies before their mothers' eyes prior to
raping the mother to death. Yeah, *** him. I can't think of
enough
bad things to do to this person. I wish him ill, because HIS
ACTIONS
made him unworthy of the protection of our society. See, he
deliberately chose to satisfy his own self at the expense of people
smaller and weaker than himself. This is the definition of evil.


And where exactly did I say he wasn't an evil piece of scum?

Mez


And in my opinion, he certainly isn't *human*.

Sure, let the government declare some people aren't human. What
could possibly go wrong with that idea? Take away *some* people's
rights. You really must be ignorant of history to not see what a
horrible idea that is.


Just as ignorant as not seeing that some people are sub-human. No
matter how you fancy 'em up, they are still scum, through and
through. And no matter how many chances you give 'em, they will come
right back and bite you in the ass.



But I didn't say you should "give them another chance". That's three
posts in a row where you've made up something I didn't say. Are you
trying to get me to killfile you?


Are you trying to censor my own viewpoints now?

Nope. Responding to me you said "And no matter how many chances you
give 'em...", I think that clearly implies that I said these death row
inmates deserve a second chance. I didn't say that. Pointing out
you're making up stuff I didn't say to make a straw man argument is not
"censoring" you, it's calling you on a dishonest tactic.

Oh, and catching you making up straw men arguments, and trying to
somehow make that about "censorship", also dishonest.

I am allowed to say what I think.

Sure, but you claim I say things that I haven't. That's dishonest. I
say a guy can spend his money any way he wants to. You respond that
well, should we pass a law telling ol' Bo how he can spend his money
then, huh, how would I like that? Dishonest, since you're making up a
false version of my position and then arguing with it.

Dishonest.

What makes you think each and every thing I say is somehow involved
with you?

When you're saying it in response to my posts, addressing me directly,
and bringing up things about me (my car, my love of motorcycles). Gee,
you're argung with me and about me, how could I possibly think your
comments are directed at me when they're merely, you know, obviously
directed at me.

Dishonest.

I have stated from the beginning, just because someone is a person,
doesn't make the human IN MY OPINION.


Uh huh, and my response to that was a perfectly valid argument that
history shows that's a bad idea, and it seems you're ignorant of that
history. Gee, forgive me, the person with a degree in European history
from one of the best university history departments on the planet if I
think that I might know a little more about the "treating some people as
subhuman" meme in history than you picked up from a no doubt top flight
high school. How arrogant of me, I know.

But not censoring you. But hey, toss it in the same pot and imply
that's what I did/ There's a word for that kind of tactic.

Dishonest.


While you resort to your usual condescending attitude.


It's hard to be humble when you really are better than 90% of the people
around you

Take a pill.


Took two ibuprofen, thanks. Strongest thing in the house. Your home may
vary.

Have a drink.


No thanks, don't need the calories and I'm out of cranberry juice. Which
leaves a beer or an appletini as the in house options.

Quit being a prick.


But it's a major part of my charm. Many women love pricks.


Surely you jest. Even you can't be that dumb about women.





.

Loading