Re: AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- From: Lars Eighner <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:46:33 -0600
In our last episode, <XBRqj.67968$vt2.66664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the
lovely and talented tiny dancer broadcast on alt.true-crime:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnfqnot7.2tpu.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In our last episode, <iSLqj.93245$L%6.50723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the
lovely and talented tiny dancer broadcast on alt.true-crime:
Police say kidnapping was not random
Photo of the little boy at link posted below:
An Amber Alert was issued Thursday morning for Adrian Jaimes, a
5-year-old
boy who was kidnapped from the 11800 block Shropshire Boulevard in
Northeast
Austin.
Released and found about 8:30 p.m. (local time) Thursday (same day).
Reports are that some attempt on the boy and his sister was made by
presumably the same men recently as they were walking to school. For
this reason he was in the car to be driven to school when he was taken
this morning. As they went out of their way to get this boy in
particular when many other children in the neighborhood were walking to
school, police describe this as "not random," but also say none of the
men are related to the boy. Suspects are still at large as of 10 p.m.
Police will not speculate as to motive.
My comments: this is a somewhat better than "entry level" neighborhood,
but not well-to-do, which seems to me to make coyotes trying to collect
seem less likely. This sort of thing also sometimes involves someone's
drug debts, but there is also no indication of this.
Thanks for the update, Lars. Thank goodness the poor little boy was
released. Now WTF was he taken to begin with.
That's what anyone who knows is not saying. I mention that he was walking
with his sister when they previously encounter the men, but they were
walking home, not to school as I wrote. The sister was in the car with him
and the family this morning, so if they had been after her, they could have
taken her as well or instead of him.
School officials were interviewed, and they were aware of the previous
attempt. Technically (used to be, anyway, and probably still) they are
responsible for kids walking to or from school, so they would have been
notified when a report of the previous incident was made.
Wouldn't you think if drugs were involved, the parents would have been
even more careful? Has a father been mentioned? Just wonder if the
children lived with a father in the home?
No mention of the father that I have noticed so far. No indication that
the men might have been working for or against him.
Police/journalist speculation is the boy was released because he was just
too hot. But there is a pretty good description of the vehicle, so it is
not really all that clear to me that they have a better chance of escaping
detection without him. If they were working *for* the father, it seems to
me they would have had some better plan for handing the kid off sometime
during the day.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Countdown: 347 days to go.
.
- References:
- AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- From: tiny dancer
- Re: AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- From: Lars Eighner
- Re: AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- From: tiny dancer
- AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- Prev by Date: Suspect Wanted to Lecture Teen on Dangers of the Internet
- Next by Date: Bad Granny!
- Previous by thread: Re: AMBER ALERT/ Five Year old Austin Boy
- Next by thread: FL - Boy dies in hope chest (cedar chest)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading