Re: Drew Peterson trolling for a date > SICK<


"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:86e56bf4-fa6f-4528-9279-95733ec44cb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 25, 8:44 pm, "tiny dancer" <tinydancer...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"yD" <yaffaD...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:58542b36-4013-4922-a8ca-f8969513211b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 25, 11:01 pm, "tiny dancer" <tinydancer...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



"yD" <yaffaD...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:32c4a32e-6075-4e08-839e-2e6e728450be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 25, 3:02 pm, Bo Raxo <crimenewscen...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 25, 9:41 am, "td" <tinydan...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Poe" <haun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:5vugv8F1ns3cgU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

td wrote:
"Poe" <haun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5vuftbF1nl56tU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tiny dancer wrote:
"Poe" <haun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5vub8sF1o9vluU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bo Raxo wrote:
On Jan 23, 5:11 pm, Poe <haun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
comadrejo wrote:
In article <5vq23cF1mpd4...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Poe <haun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bo Raxo wrote:
On Jan 23, 12:05 pm, Sweet Sue
<plainfield...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Now comes Drew Peterson and his goof of a lawyer Joel
Brodsky
soliciting dates on a Chicago radio station. The
disgraced
former
Bolingbrook, Il cop, suspected of killing his former
wife,
Kathleen
Savio and a suspect in the disappearence of wife # 4,
Stacy
Peterson,
is actively looking for another victim...OOPS...I mean
wife.
Any
takers ? C'mon ladies, don't be shy.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-wed_date-drew-peterson_012...
It seems Drew cannot be without a woman in his life
for
too
long
and
his lawyer wants to lend a hand. Poor Drew. Too bad he
cannot
put
forth the same amount of effort into finding poor
Stacy
as
he
is
in
finding another live one. If this is an outrage to
you,
call
the
radio
station and tell them exactly that:
http://www.dahl.com/
Excellent. Some enterprising gal should date him and
get
him
to
spill
where he stashed Stacy's body.
Maybe OJ's long-time squeeze has a friend...
OK girls, I'm going for it. Who can resist an egomaniac
who
looks
like
a
walrus and kills his wives?
Try not to be jealous, gals.
I actually think he and his attorney are doing these
stunts,
to
try
to
desperately to help him if he is brought to trial with
any
future
jury
pool, especially women. Any prosecutor won't be stupid if
they
didn't
get a majority of women on the jury for any future murder
case
with
Drew
Peterson as the defendant. Given he has pissed plenty of
women
with
his
antics with the media.
That's a very astute analysis. About the only thing that
makes
sense.

Some of his past TV appearances are not going to be
easily
forgotten,
especially his Today show appearance when he blamed Stacy
Peterson's
behavior on her menstrual cycle.
Yeah, women hate that...especially when it's true.

[ Oh, I can see that comment getting some gals' dander up.
But
it's
a
fact, ladies, you hate it when we call you on being all
PMSy. ]

I think he will go to trial for the death of Kathleen
Savio,
and
he
won't for Stacy Peterson, until her body is discovered.
There
is
still
not enough evidence to get a conviction, and he being an
obnoxious
creep
isn't a criminal offense. I think there is enough
evidence
to
get
a
conviction of Drew Peterson for the death Kathleen Savio.
Tough one to prosecute, as it was ruled an accident
initially.
If I
were a defense attorney I'd say they were just trying a
back
door
way
of getting a conviction on Stacy's death by using Kathleen
as
a
proxy.

I hate to be a person in favor or prison justice, but one
murder
conviction will likely land him in general population more
so
than
if
he
had two (and thus a DP sentence). Either works for me.
Former cop? No way he'd be in genpop. I'm surprised that
you'd
wish
some kind of vigilante action on someone. What exactly do
you
have
in
mind here, beatings or rapes? 'Cause you know it would be
both.
You're the last person I'd expect to take a pro-rape
stance. I
hear
there's a web site for folks like you...

Nah, those websites are directed at raping women, preferably
the
ones
your're dating. I don't know of a single website devoted to
raping
men
who
murder women. Got a cite for one of those?

td

You may have identified a new fetish to exploit.

Well since most think these sites are strictly there for profit
(
money ),
perhaps I should think about cashing in, 'eh? We certainly
aren't
at
a
loss
for men who murder their wives/dates/women carrying their
children........yadda yadda.

td

EXACTLY. If you can't beat 'em... then again, if you set up your
sight
to virtually "best 'em" - then you could both beat 'em AND join
'em!
How
cool is that???$$$

I think we should partner up and make some money! After all, it's
the
american way, anything goes for a buck.

A quick google search turned up sites that feature (fake) pictures of
men raping both men and women. The first few that came up in my
search seemed to focus on men in military uniforms raping males and
females. One of them that falsely claimed its pictures were real
stirred up some controversy (translation: free publicity).

Feel free to check out: cruel--rape.com/
orwww.freerapeporn.com/sites/
or gayrapevids.townhall.com/
orwww.sexreactor.net/browse/search-gay_male_rape/
orhttp://ca.geocities.com/boys882german/naked-boy-rape-gallery.htm
or a whole bunch of sites listed
athttp://technorati.com/blogs/anal-diary-online.com?reactions
or vediliki.vox.com/

I also have to point out that if, say, Snyder made a crack about
setting up a male-on-female rape site to make some quick bucks, you'd
go thermonuclear. But when you make it about male victims, well har
de
har.

Bo Raxo- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, yes, har de har. It was a joke.
yD

It's apparently only acceptable when women are the purported victims.
Then
it's free speech and all. "Don't be so touchy" "It's only a *fantasy*"
"Some men are attracted to these sites, but not *me*."

Just don't suggest those sites be about *men* though. No, that is 'not
nice', not acceptable. Can we all say hipocrite?

td- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd rather say knee jerk male chauvanist pig (just to balance the knee
jerk feminist that's so popular).
yD

I'm guessing *they* find it dehumanizing to men, 'eh?

td

I don't find these rape fantasy sites particularly dehumanizing to
men. If you want my sexist side, I think men are far more able to have
these sorts of depictions around as fantasy victims than women,
because in real life men are generally better equipped physically and
temperamentally to fight off an actual attack.

These things are fantasies, role play, and a completely different
animal than actual rapists and actual rapes. You and (surprisingly)
Nancy have projected some opinion on me that I somehow take it
differently depending on the gender of the fictional - f-i-c-t-i-o-n-a-
l - victim.

But people with edgy sex fantasies bear *no* relation to people who
commit violent sex crimes. The former is a fetish that is sexual,
the latter is a violent social dysfunction with a sexual aspect. As
in, one is about sex with a spice of violence, the other is about
violence with a spice of sex. Try very hard, and I know you could
grasp the difference.

Could, but probably won't.


Bo Raxo


It's already been pointed out to you that you have no way of knowing if
these sites are *fictional* or not, since many of them originate in Third
World Countries, where it is hardly *dangerous* or *intimidating* to post
REAL rapes. Once again you romanticize the topic, probably to silk scarves
and busty blonds when in all actuality they more likely contain beatings,
threats, weapons, and extreme violence, like perhaps REAL RAPES. It's whole
different world between consenting partners *playing* a game, and four or
five thugs raping a female, adult or child. I noticed you avoided the topic
after REAL males pointed that fact out to you. You also backed away after
it being pointed out that many 'real crimes' right here find their way to
the internet, what with the advent of cell phone cameras.

Other than males who are incarcerated, most males have no real concept of
rape. Especially not when they compare it to something like a couple
drunken middle-aged women 'making comments' about them. Like I said, if
these sites depicted, oh say black men being hog tied, put in dog collars,
beaten, etc., I believe you'd be singing a different tune as to 'freedom of
expression.' We certainly heard a lot from you about the Iraqi prison
tortures and photo's there of. Oh wait, those involved *men* as victims.

td




.

Loading