Re: MSNBC: KUSA says Mary Lacy will not file charges against Karr


Kris Baker wrote:
"Hunter" <buffhunter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156799627.027957.4770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----
John Karr's innocence does not translate to John Ramsey's guilt. As to
his "disappearance" he wanted his privacy. Simple as that. And what is
there to re-investigate? The lack of evidence against the Ramseys and
the overwhelming evidence of an intruder has not changed. Karr is not
the intruder, but that does not mean there wasn't one and the evidence
shows that there was one. If you have evidence of John Ramsey or Patsy
Ramsey, what is it?

---->Hunter


If that evidence of an intruder is "so overwhelming" as you state, why
hasn't the Boulder DA (who basically staked her career on it), Lou Smith
(who's done the same) and Michael Tracey been able to solve it?

Because there's NO evidence that firmly points to an intruder. None.

Kris
----
Knowing that it was an intruder is not the same as to knowing who the
intruder is. If you have fingerprints on a glass but you don't have on
file who those fingerprints belong to is that evidence that the glass
wasn't picked up by someone? No, it was picked up, you just don't know
who it was.

I have unknown DNA, unknown palm prints, an unknown boot print, unknown
animal hairs in JB's hands, No history of violence on the part of the
parents, no motive and an entry/ exit point in the basement. Plus the
failure to indict on the part of a Grand Jury and the ruling of a
Federal Judge.

On your side a rogue bowl of pineapple and a Ransom note that by the
lights of most handwriting analyst say while it does not categorically
exclude Patsy from writing it say that there is less than a 50% percent
chance she did. Ironically, in light of the Karr case some are even
questioning the validity of handwriting analysis as a reliable science,
helping Patsy.

You still haven't said what two pieces of evidence points to the
Ramseys killing their child.

---->Hunter

.

Relevant Pages