Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:23:32 -0700
"Bo Raxo" <forensics@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153095711.835948.327420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
might
Michael Snyder wrote:
"Bo Raxo" <forensics@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153081735.707076.93550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael Snyder wrote:
I don't think that I have given you any reason to suspect that I
arebe
more inclined to discredit a girl than a boy. Do I ask you if you
givenmore inclined to discredit a jew than a christian? No -- you've
"maybeme no reason to suspect it, and as a nominally decent person (though
some of your questions give me pause), you deserve the benefit of
the doubt.
Perhaps the reason Poe wondered, to go out on a limb here, is not so
much that you have displayed gender bias, but because your whole
the 11 year old was asking for it" stance is so utterly, incredibly,
completely, insane.
It would be -- if I had said ANYTHING REMOTELY LIKE THAT.
Honestly, that looks like your position to me. You've talked about
whether physical force was used, as if that is a crucial difference,
It is the crucial difference to the distinction that I was making.
I'm reading that as your believing an 11 year old can consent to sex.
I never said consent, I said initiate. Are you going to tell me
that an 11 year old cannot initiate sex?
If not, then why does physical force become a neccesary component to
proving rape occurred?
Beats me -- I never said it did. I was explicitly drawing a distinction
between FORCIBLE rape and STATUTORY rape. The difference
being PRECISELY whether physical force was used.
Bo, I like you, but it's hard to remember that when you immitate
Tiny Dancer by attributing absurd and offensive straw-man
positions to me.
Dude, check what you've written on this thread.
Dude, YOU check what I have written on this thread --
because it bears no resemblance to your interpretation.
I'm not the only one
who thinks you think an 11 year old can somehow be responsible for
initiating sexual contact with an adult.
No, I know you're not -- that's why I compared you to Tiny.
If that's not your position,
It's not my position. I never said anything about responsibility.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Bo Raxo
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- References:
- Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Bo Raxo
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Poe
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Poe
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: imnot911
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Poe
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Poe
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Poe
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Bo Raxo
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- From: Bo Raxo
- Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- Prev by Date: Re: The Problem You Should Have with Homosexuality
- Next by Date: Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- Previous by thread: Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- Next by thread: Re: Fresno gang rape: new details emerge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|