Re: Stivers family is SAFE, all rescued


"Andrys Basten" <andrys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e01fg6$6ld$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <44243a27$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Fragile Warrior, F'loonslayer <volfie@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"Andrys Basten" <andrys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e01eff$lu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <44242f4b$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Fragile Warrior, F'loonslayer <volfie@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"Andrys Basten" <andrys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e01c0v$rh9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

No, you'd like to think that's what I meant. I meant
the constant, scathing, disdain for their non-action
even after you saw the stories they did do things
to get attention

Did you miss the post where I said if they did something that was GREAT?
Or do you selectively edit your reading so you can beat a dead horse?

No, I didn't miss it. The word "if" was so difficult
for you that you never responded to the posts of news
stories that showed exactly what they did.

Please note the timing of the posts. "IF" was used before a hard news
copy
was posted.

I said it was great if they had done something, anything. What, exactly,
do
you want?

I don't want anything from you in particular. But I do see things
that are too obvious.

That you don't even acknowledge the news reports describing what they
DID do (not 'if' they did)


Did you notice that everyone was claiming they even burned a building but
the FAMILY wasn't claiming that? That's a big ol' "if", isn't it? And
did you notice these things didn't start to come out until folks were going,
"Hey, why didn't you DO something to signal rescuers?" I thought I'd like
to see a little proof that they had actually done something. But, hey,
what's it to YOU? I wasn't casting aspertions on your vacation plans.

Or are you just pissed that I didn't hop to congratulatory telegrams to the
nitwits? That I didn't state the obvious and declare, "Oh, thank God
they're alive!" (Duh. Does that REALLY need to be said?) You'll be a long
time waiting if you want me to retract my statements regarding their
brainpan wattage. Starting with a joy ride with a meth head in a broken
down RV, I'm going to stand by my statements that they are both st00pid and
very, very lucky.

That they took all those chances with their children's lives, btw, is
appalling on multiple levels. Are you defending that too?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stivers family is SAFE, all rescued
    ... Fragile Warrior, F'loonslayer wrote: ... stories that showed exactly what they did. ... Please note the timing of the posts. ... "IF" was used before a hard news copy ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Stivers family is SAFE, all rescued
    ... Fragile Warrior, F'loonslayer wrote: ... Please note the timing of the posts. ... "IF" was used before a hard news ... found safe is Stupid Stupid Stupid, ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Real NON RBR Reaction
    ... Web Images Groups News Froogle Local more » ... Advanced News Search ... >Top Stories ... Edit a standard section ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Why do people want to believe bad news and terrible stories?
    ... > In discussing these stories, no matter how someone points out that the ... our willingness to accept "bad news" solely on word of mouth ... the truth and thus can protect themselves. ... still conveys upon them the illusion of power ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine
    ... respondents are allowed to pick what "we", meaning Republicans, will ... Big 3 news tilts vs. GOP ... Only 12 percent of election stories that aired on NBC, ... coverage has become a referendum on Republican leadership. ...
    (soc.retirement)
Loading