Re: Teacher, Student Reach Compromise In Restraining Order Case

x-no-archive:yes



"vivisectrix" <vivisectrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43e0f4f4.1503403218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> TinyDancer:
>
> >>>x-no-archive:yes
>
> >>>Note no-archive tag at the top, and please reproduce on any responses.
>
> >>Thanks for ignoring that.
>
> >I thought all I had to do was copy the whole post, not delete any part of
> >it. Sorry. I assumed I was supposed to just click on *reply* and be sure
> >to not delete any part of it, which is what I did, and that would carry
> >over the whole thing. including the x-no thingie. I certainly didn't mean
> >to *ignore* it, in fact I was very careful to not delete it.
>
> When you click on reply, most newsreaders put the > things in front of the
> original message. That changes the x-no-archive:yes message, so it no
> longer works. That's what happened here.
>
> If your newsreader doesn't automatically no-archive a reply to a
> no-archived post, what you need to do in order to honour the request from
> the original poster is make sure that the very first line of your reply is
> the no-archive command. So the very first line of your reply post should
> say:
>
> x-no-archive:yes
>
> Nothing else can be in that line, and there needs to be a space after that
> line to make sure it works.
>
> Another option is to not quote the original poster at all, but that will
> make a lot of people crazy, because they won't know what you're replying
> to.


Thank you vivi, I tried it on this post as an experiment.  I think
someone/bo? might have explained this to me once before, but obviously I
didn't *remember* how it worked, and I thought the way I was doing it was
the right way.  I noticed his request and was very careful to not delete
*anything* before replying because I thought that was what I needed to do.
I certainly didn't do it on purpose to ignore or discount his request.

Again bo, I am very sorry and I truly apologize for MY mistake.  It was all
MY fault.  I don't know what else to say.  I didn't do it on purpose.


td


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Categorization Tree
    ... I believe you are confusing Bob, the original poster, with myself ... who was replying to his request. ...
    (comp.text.tex)
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Mailing List Netiquette
    ... the original poster in the To: line of the email, ... source community members for the future. ... posts each time if you are only replying to 2 lines. ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Licensing - The biter- bit?
    ... in response to the DCMS refusal to confirm that Feargal ... Sharkey had recently met DCMS officials to discuss Licensing Act ... include the purpose, of discussing draft exemptions from the Licensing Act ... already held by the time of the decision on this FoIA request, ...
    (uk.music.folk)
  • Licensing - The biter- bit?
    ... in response to the DCMS refusal to confirm that Feargal ... Sharkey had recently met DCMS officials to discuss Licensing Act exemptions ... include the purpose, of discussing draft exemptions from the Licensing Act ... already held by the time of the decision on this FoIA request, ...
    (uk.music.folk)
  • Re: Spaceball Source Code
    ... If you had some other purpose in mind, it's *still* not at all clear. ... If it is your intention to turn in the source code as if you had ... the real purpose of the request ... recently a big thread over in comp.std.c over the Standard function ...
    (comp.lang.c)
Loading