Re: Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- From: "Cliff and Linda Griffith" <grifftex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:27:21 -0600
"Indigo Ace" <indigoace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43be970c.11854875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I think his appeal has a shot, actually--since his son is a police
> officer, it could be argued that he was acting as a police officer
> when he searched his dad's place & thus the search was illegal, since
> there was no warrant.
I hope not. Since he was a "son", he pretty much had a right to go into his
father's house. I think these boys did a really good thing in turning their
daddy in, just as I think Ted Kacszinsky's [sp] brother and other family
members did a good thing in turning *him* in. Anyway, there were three sons
who turned the man in...not just the policeman. If the policeman had been
acting as a police officer, there would've been no need for him to call his
brothers and "consult" before turning the father in. Whether he admits it
or not, I think the father is grateful that his sons did the right thing.
Linda
.
- References:
- Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- From: Indigo Ace
- Re: Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- From: Indigo Ace
- Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- Prev by Date: Re: Update - Bank employee who drained immigrants' accounts is charged with embezzlement
- Next by Date: Re: Psychology Questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- Next by thread: Re: Bank robber turned in by sons gets 40 years
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|