Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- From: ravinwulf <ravnwulf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:39:17 -0600
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:14:53 -0600, "flick" <flick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
><netuser_axel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:1134052173.719914.7210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> The woman is 61yo w/ a cane and injured back - 'pulling' the dog in a
>> kennel may be less strainful than carrying it, but allowing the leashed
>> animal to simply use its own four legs would make the most sense.
>>
>> I wonder how many cases of "leash entanglement" between pet owners and
>> residents occurred at the complex to warrant such a restriction?
>
>Now that I think of it, sounds more like a way to restrict the size of dogs.
>You're gonna be penalized if you can't carry your dog through the lobby.
>
>It'd be pretty funny if they rented to a power lifter with a Mastiff ;-).
>
>Really, they're discriminating against her on the basis of a medical
>condition, aren't they? In a way, sorta.
That's what I was thinking as well. Sounds like she needs an attorney
to go at it from that angle.
ravinwulf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Attn Bo:New Law Could Lead To Parole For Convicted Killer
- Next by Date: Re: Air passenger bi-polar, off meds ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- Next by thread: Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading