Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- From: "flick" <flick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:14:53 -0600
<netuser_axel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134052173.719914.7210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> The woman is 61yo w/ a cane and injured back - 'pulling' the dog in a
> kennel may be less strainful than carrying it, but allowing the leashed
> animal to simply use its own four legs would make the most sense.
>
> I wonder how many cases of "leash entanglement" between pet owners and
> residents occurred at the complex to warrant such a restriction?
Now that I think of it, sounds more like a way to restrict the size of dogs.
You're gonna be penalized if you can't carry your dog through the lobby.
It'd be pretty funny if they rented to a power lifter with a Mastiff ;-).
Really, they're discriminating against her on the basis of a medical
condition, aren't they? In a way, sorta.
flick 100785
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- From: ravinwulf
- Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- From: netuser_axel
- Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Cops go Nazi at Miami airport
- Next by Date: Re: Cops go Nazi at Miami airport
- Previous by thread: Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- Next by thread: Re: Only in California - Doggone expensive to walk that pooch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading