Re: 48 Hours Saturday
- From: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:39:53 GMT
"DanaPointe" <dana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130755749.557800.298760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Didn't seem to me to be enough evidence against the husband to
> > even charge him, let alone convict him.
>
> Me, either. If I'd been on that jury, it would've hung. It just kills
> me, too, the way prosecutors sometimes introduce a motive they just
> pulled out of their ass. That *scare her so she'll want to move into
> town* idea was ludicrous. Even worse, at the end of the show, the
> screen read that living in town wasn't even a requirement for the
> police chief position. He really should get another trial -- especially
> after the three inmates came forward to say the original witness was
> lying.
I vaguely remember this case as it was unfolding. The
unreliable prosecution witness, the not-much-more-reliable
impeaching defense witnesses. I didn't remember the
my-expert-can-beat-up-your-expert part, but damn --
that guy got shafted. Can't say he's innocent, but he for sure
should get a new trial, after three witnesses came forward
and said the prosecution's only witness was lying...
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Court TV host mentions family suicide
- Next by Date: Re: Court TV host mentions family suicide
- Previous by thread: Re: 48 Hours Saturday
- Next by thread: Re: 48 Hours Saturday
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|