Re: Pictures of Rader in bondage


"Strawberry" <nope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MPG.1d740ac5289eef039897d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
In article <p2ekg119m4g86a5rmfb0jog75afnrk3tdc@xxxxxxx>,
i.am.me.as.you.are.he@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...

On 22 Aug 2005 12:04:06 -0700, "robbielynn" <robbielynnwynn@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>The man bought the Barbies for himself!! Sorry, but that's abnormal!

  When someone goes into a store and buys something, do you know who
they are buying it for?  It's only abnormal if you live in a world of
stereotypical gender roles.  I don't think a man buying Barbies for
himself is at all abnormal, they have hellacious collector value.  I
think what Rader did with them, however, is abnormal.  That's the
difference - it's not that he bought the dolls, but what he bought the
for...


Actually, he didn't buy BARBIE dolls -- they were generic Barbie-LIKE
dolls he bought at a dollar store -- I think one of them was a Spice
Girls doll.  Barbie dolls are expensive, after all.


Most Barbie dolls aren't worth the cost of the cardboard box they
come in; only the older ones OR a few highly limited genuine issues.
People who are "investing" in these things need to remember that
you can now buy Beanie Babies by the shovelful.

Kris 

.