Re: Are transsexuals obligated to tell partners? GWEN ARAUJO case


Laurey wrote:
> "vivo per lei" <KA1985@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1123562470.708832.262220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > You have no understanding of the law whatsoever, and is getting
> > pathetic. What you fail to see is that in 1996 homosexuality was
> > illegal in Tennessee. Therefore, even though the girls had consensual
> > sex with the femboy, the "sex offender" engaged them in what was
> > considered "illegal activity" under the law.
>
> That may be, but how is "homosexuality" fraud? It was rape by fraud of which
> the rapist was convicted, not "homosexuality".

If somebody engages in any activity that is considered illegal by law,
and one person is aware of this but the other is not, then it is fraud
by law. If the person uses force or intimidation to get sexual
gratification then it is rape.

Your continued rants about the Tennessee cases is emblematic of your
failure and inability to prove your accusation.


> > Furthermore, rape is
> > one form of sexual assault and not all sexual assaults are considered
> > rape under the law
>
> You are correct. One news report said convicted of "rape by defraud" and
> another said convicted of "sexual assault by fraud". Since a third report
> said, before her conviction, that she was on trial for rape, and since
> Tennessee's current code (I don't know how it was in 1996, I admit) doesn't
> even use the term "sexual assault" (they use "rape" and "sexual battery"),
> and since there was penetration with an object and that meets Tennessee's
> definition of "rape", I'm inclined to believe that it was a rape conviction.

That you are inclined to believe it was a rape conviction doesn't make
it so.
I am inclined to believe that "penetration with an object" meant it was
forcible rape, but just because I am inclined to believe it doesn't
make it a fact.

> > Stupid comparison. You are oblivious to the fact that Gwen was the same
> > exact person the criminals consented to sexual gratification.
>
> Was not the 17-year-old Tennessee rapist the same exact person that her
> victim consented to have sex with? Why do YOU think she was convicted of
> rape by fraud?
>
>
> > Thanks for confirming what a moron you are. MTF Transsexuals are not
> > out there to rape women.
>
> Gee, it is a good thing women have mind-reading powers so they know if that
> man in a dress is MTF TS or a rapist, huh?

So how do you discern the difference between your average woman and a
female rapist? It is very rare that you hear about women raping women,
but it just as rare as a transvestite raping women, much less a
transsexual. Should we ban butch women, transgendered lesbians, and
bodybuilders from using public restrooms because other women find them
intimidating?


> > A law preventing them from using the restroom
> > will not stop a rapist from doing so!
>
> No, but it makes it more difficult. If a woman sees a questionable-looking
> "woman" in the restroom she knows to be on guard, scream, or perhaps call
> someone to investigate. If MTF TSs are legally allowed in the women's
> restroom, someone who did that could be sued. This fear of being sued would
> make people reluctant to raise the alarm when they see someone suspicious
> going into the women's restroom, making it that much easier for a rapist to
> do so.

It would certainly be great if that "woman" in question was
biologically female, and then sues the bitch who would dare humilliate
another human being like that.

If I were Gwen, and I was alive, and you were slandering me like you
are doing with her, I would certainly make you proof your acussation in
a court of law. You cannot just go around calling people rapists like
that.

Gwen was one naive individual, but certainly not rapist.

.

Quantcast