Re: Are transsexuals obligated to tell partners? GWEN ARAUJO case

"vivo per lei" <KA1985@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123396098.300893.139330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> If you don't want to have sex with somebody with male genitalia then
> don't be so stupid to have irresponsible sex without confirming your
> concerns.

If they asked, was she obligated to tell?


> Any resonable
> person would suspect something is wrong if the girl in question doesn't
> let you touch her breasts or genitals when having sex, especially if
> this is so important to you.

They did suspect.


> But he honest truth is that at that time
> they didn't care if Gwen was hiding something or not, they didn't care
> about Gwen's "too rough hands for a girl," they just wanted to get off.

How do you know this? I think they were trying to be gentlemen, and respect
her boundaries. Where are your sexual ethics? Don't you know you are not
supposed to do things in bed that make your lover uncomfortable? She didn't
want them touching her in certain places; they were considerate of her
wishes. If only she had been equally respectful...


> The discovery of Gwen's actual genitalia
> didn't come as a surprise to them after they "compared notes."

It was a confirmation of their worst fears -- they had indeed been raped.
Like a woman who has been drugged and raped; she wakes up suspecting that
might have been the case, but it is only later, when presented with medical
evidence after an exam, that her suspicions are confirmed, and with that
comes a flood of emotions.


> They
> even premeditated her murder had they discovered their sex partner of
> choice had a ***!

Was the actual murder anything like the murder they planned?


.

Loading