Re: DNA ancestry

wulfit <wulfit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> : What evidence do you have that monarchies are inherently absolute? You
:> make
:> : an unconvincing case. It is clear from history that a monarchy can take
:> on
:> : different forms, often determined by the amount of power that "the
:> people"
:> : are prepared to allow it to exercise, or which it is prepared to grab.
:> : Therefore, I would have thought that an absolute monarchy is just an
:> extreme
:> : form based on a power grab rather than being anything inherent.
:>
:> I don't think this is a matter of "evidence",but of pure principle.
:> The wishes of "the people" are of no relevance to the principle of
:> what a monarchy is...nor indeed are the wishes of monarchs themselves.
: -----------------------
: You answered the question with a non-answer. I was looking for a smidgen of
: something to support your view that monarchy is inviolable, but you didn't
: provide it. Contending that something is a fact because it is a fact
: (monarchy is a good thing because it is a good thing) doesn't help your
: case. I am disappointed but I won't give up encouraging you to find some
: piece of evidence, no matter how small and apparently insignificant, to
: support your absolutist views. I consider it a quest, in much the same way
: that Sir Edmund Hillary, I imagine, approached his intended conquest of
: Mount Everest.

I am disappointed that you appear to believe that only someone else
having thought so first can support my principles necessarily having
always been true.Gravity was just as strong before people started
putting laws about it in writing,or before there were people or writing.

: Are you disinclined to live in Scotland because of the weather, or because
: you'd have to wear a kilt? They are actually quite comfortable but also
: rather scratchy, as the wool is very coarse. And if there is an icy wind
: blowing up the Khyber, then you know you're alive. When I wear mine out and
: about in Edinburgh, I am invariably stopped by American tourists who
: consider me quaint and who want to take my photo.

I refuse to wear a kilt,or tolerate their being worn by
anyone without something underneath...best to keep me
away from those I would have to forcibly forbid from
paying heed to the wishes of the infamous "regimental
inspector",though this is not intrinsic to the nature of
existence as is the necessarily absolute nature of properly
understood Monarchy.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DNA ancestry
    ... :>: just as much of an inviolable requirement as absolute monarchy. ... but I no longer hold out any hope that you can offer any evidence in support ... The problem you face is that they are not principles, nor is anything inalterable, just because you say so and because you want it to be that way. ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: DNA ancestry
    ... :>: What evidence do you have that monarchies are inherently absolute? ... It is clear from history that a monarchy can take ... As far as I can tell, you believe that wearing knickers under the kilt is just as much of an inviolable requirement as absolute monarchy. ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: DNA ancestry
    ... :>: (monarchy is a good thing because it is a good thing) doesn't help your ... :>: support your absolutist views. ... just as much of an inviolable requirement as absolute monarchy. ... that you wouldn't breach that particular law again. ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: DNA ancestry
    ... It is clear from history that a monarchy can ... :> existence as is the necessarily absolute nature of properly ... As far as I can tell, you believe that wearing knickers under the kilt is ... that you wouldn't breach that particular law again. ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: Has the UK gone now?
    ... The monarchy has the right, and some would argue duty, to dissovle ... have been many attacks by the government, ... Cherie Blair refuses to bow to the Queen, as for Tony Blair, it is ... evidence if evidence were needed, that the rule of state has superseded ...
    (uk.politics.misc)